saveliberty
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2009
- 58,756
- 10,837
- 2,030
Must be all the tornadoes went horizontal....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No Skook, I will not be your top. Not the way I swing. So stop asking.
Now, the quick summary as to why global warming won't change tornado rates much either way ...
A. Tornadoes need moist unstable air coming up from the Gulf of Mexico.
B. Tornadoes need wind shear, which is driven by the jet stream.
Global warming makes more of "A" and less of "B", so it's kind of a wash.
And you never explained the change of climate in the Sahara nor what caused the Little Ice Age. Why am I not surprised?
Sure I did. I implied natural causes. English, learn it.
I also pointed out how your train of logic was 'effin retarded.
You're telling us "climate changed naturally in the past, so humans can't change climate".
That's as stupid as saying "forest fires were caused naturally in the past, so humans can't cause forest fires".
I've never encountered an intelligent and moral denier. Any person who possesses reason and common sense instantly sees right through denier stupidity. Of course, there are few corrupt intelligent deniers who understand that they're spouting shit. They just lie for the money and power.
Wind shear is a change in wind speeds at a right angle and is a factor in hurricane development. It stand to reason that if there are more hurricanes as Warmers suggest,
then more tornadoes would be a consequence. It is driven by temperature differences across a front.
Wind shear is a change in wind speeds at a right angle and is a factor in hurricane development. It stand to reason that if there are more hurricanes as Warmers suggest,
Nobody suggests that. They suggest more powerful hurricanes, not more numbers of hurricanes.
then more tornadoes would be a consequence. It is driven by temperature differences across a front.
The wind shear is driven more by the jet stream, and global warming causes a weaker jet stream, hence less wind shear.
EXPLAIN THE NATURAL CAUSING THAT CAUSED THE LITTLE ICE AGE AND THE DRAMATIC CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE SAHARA!
And I never claimed that man can’t affect climate. How’s that for English?
EXPLAIN THE NATURAL CAUSING THAT CAUSED THE LITTLE ICE AGE AND THE DRAMATIC CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE SAHARA!
First explain the relevance of your question. I'm not going into a detailed explanation of the science unless I'm convinced you're asking in good faith. I don't do weasel games, and you look like you're playing a weasel game.
Look at me for an example of honesty. I make my points directly, without playing weasel question games. My point is that your "Climate changes naturally, so humans can't change climate!" line of reasoning is quite stupid.
And I never claimed that man can’t affect climate. How’s that for English?
Then what point are you trying to make? Don't expect me to be a mind reader. I can only go by what your write. If you've got a point to make, have the guts to state it directly.
Selling the "more tornadoes" idea was just a bridge too far.. But they TRIED..
Does the climate change naturally? Have there been periods of more rapid shifts than other times? What is the ratio of human generated CO2 emissions that drive the rate change?
Selling the "more tornadoes" idea was just a bridge too far.. But they TRIED..
No, they didn't. You're just making everything up. You do that all the time now.
On the bright side, given how spectacularly you've failed at all the science for so many years, your attempts at conspiracy theory propaganda will have to go better than your attempts at science.
Does the climate change naturally? Have there been periods of more rapid shifts than other times? What is the ratio of human generated CO2 emissions that drive the rate change?
And what point are you trying to make? Again, I don't read minds.
Listen s0n....I know you tried to get me banned because I offended you after making a comment about your cat.
Listen s0n....I know you tried to get me banned because I offended you after making a comment about your cat.
As I've pointed out before, you primarily display histrionic personality disorder ("PAY ATTENTION TO ME ME ME!"), but you also show a streak of paranoia.
Other deniers display more of narcissistic, sociopathic, antisocial or schizotypal personality disorder. The denier cult is kind of a collection of personality disorders.
An honest person would just answer the questions.
Can't stop lying can you. "By 2080" implies something happening that culminates in that year, not starting that year.GD I hate you lying twisting scum.Liar.
What part of "by 2080" in that article was unclear to you? Do you think the current year is 2080?
Sop, did you lie deliberately there, out of butthurt against me and cult fervor, or were you just being a moron?
Your refusal to admit there are bigger temp swings which should result in more tornadoes is telling.
Can't stop lying can you. "By 2080" implies something happening that culminates in that year, not starting that year.
An honest person would just answer the questions.
An honest person would tell you where to put your dishonest and cowardly weasel games, as I'm doing. If you're too gutless to make a point directly, just say so. As it stands, that is the point you've made.
I asked questions as a form of extracting truth from you, you understand that and are avoiding.