Si modo
Diamond Member
That is not true, either. Kay may have claimed that, but Kay is no chemist.Ummm, yes, Iraq did have chemical weapons.
Um..do you even know what you are talking about?
Iraq attacked Iran..not the other way around.
And Iraq could have just as easily used chemical weapons against US forces as it did against Iran.
It didn't have them.
As it stood they were using outdated munitions to cobble together roadside bombs.
Most of the resistance in Iraq was made up of ex military that were disbanded as part of the brilliant invasion plan. They then looted weapons depots and that's when the party really got started.
We found over 500 shells after invasion.
They were not usable. Nor should I have to point out that they were remnants from the Iran war and not the WMD the Bush Administration claimed Iraq was producing.
Here is info on that: http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/193216-1
Last edited: