Radical New Congress Constitution rule irks House Democrats

Discussion in 'Congress' started by Neotrotsky, Dec 23, 2010.

  1. taichiliberal
    Offline

    taichiliberal BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,517
    Thanks Received:
    239
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +239
    That Charley is Main(ly) dealing from ignorance regarding the Fairness Doctrine is the basis for his viewpoints and assertions.
     
  2. Big Fitz
    Offline

    Big Fitz User Quit *****

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    16,917
    Thanks Received:
    2,472
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,474
    I see. And if government decides that progressive taxation is unfair and repeals the 16% amendment and put in place a consumption tax, eliminating the redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor will this be fair?
     
  3. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    156,428
    Thanks Received:
    14,071
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +44,307
    Fitz's question with a question dodges the question, ineffectively though, while trying dodging the original quesiton, which is equally ineffective as a tactic. taichiliberal has knocked Fitz off the ropes and his getting ready to knock his argument out of the ring.
     
  4. Charles_Main
    Offline

    Charles_Main AR15 Owner

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Messages:
    16,692
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Ratings:
    +2,251
    Yes, But how do you do it. Who makes sure the people making sure it is fair, are being fair.

    Hmmm?
     
  5. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    156,428
    Thanks Received:
    14,071
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +44,307
    Designate somebody to give a rebuttal, no longer no shorter in length and germane to the promprt.
     
  6. taichiliberal
    Offline

    taichiliberal BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,517
    Thanks Received:
    239
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +239
    And as you can see folks, Fitz is like all willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn neocon parrots....when Fitz could NOT answer a simple question (If he believes that the news media has such a terrible liberal bias, then why would he be against legislation that would INSURE that conservative viewpoints have a fighting, if not equal, chance?), could not offer valid documentation to support his assertions and allegations, and was given valid documentation that his assertions were wrong, Fitz merely moves the goal post by trying to put forth some clap trap hypothetical that has NOTHING to do with what the Fairness Doctrine was about.

    Sorry Fitz, but your ploy won't work.....the burden of proof is on YOU, as the chronology of the posts shows. Stay on target and answer accordingly, and maybe then I'll address your ridiculous hypothetical.
     
  7. taichiliberal
    Offline

    taichiliberal BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,517
    Thanks Received:
    239
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +239
    A simple solution....but that would mean airing a contrary opinion that might contain facts that would logically prove the status quo wrong.....that's garlic to a vampire for the neocons and right wingnuts.

    Thing was, the Fairness Doctrine left it up to the stations to determine counter-point air time. So in a 12 hour broadcasting time, you had to have at least 1/2 hour of alternate viewpoint. :eek: Shocking!
     
  8. nraforlife
    Offline

    nraforlife Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    713
    Thanks Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +52
    has got you figured out Jakey- you are a remarkably ignorant or wilfully dishonest obamaist or maybe just stump dumb stupid.
     
  9. Big Fitz
    Offline

    Big Fitz User Quit *****

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    16,917
    Thanks Received:
    2,472
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,474
    :wtf:

    First off, typing in red doesn't give you any more credibility than it does make you a moderator.

    Second of all, the only thing you've done is run your mouth. I don't bother to bust my hump pulling links you habitually ignore or make excuses on why they're not true all the while screaming "Victory is Mine".

    So show me where it's best to continue talking to you let alone entertaining your delusions of intelligence?
     
  10. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    156,428
    Thanks Received:
    14,071
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +44,307
    Let's substitute the name"nra" and then you have it correctly.
     

Share This Page