Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All the people saying Maddow is trustworthy...
Every election year it's term limits and anti-incumbency. It just is never that simple.
Every election year it's term limits and anti-incumbency. It just is never that simple.
That's because stupid Americans do the same damn thing every election. They go around wanting to vote out EVERYONE ELSES bum, then they run right down and vote for their own bum. It's proof positive that most Americans are fucking retarded.
Yeah.. like the dipshits that will vote for McCain & Reid again... haven't they been part of this fucking mess for like... EVER? We still have more brains, even on a bad day, than the wimpy Candians or the Europeeings.
Brilliant stuff (and not partisan, so calm down).
YouTube - MSNBC's Rachel Maddow: The myth of the Anti-Incumbency movement - 'Just not true'
Brilliant stuff (and not partisan, so calm down).
YouTube - MSNBC's Rachel Maddow: The myth of the Anti-Incumbency movement - 'Just not true'
How is it possible that anyone could actually sit through this whiny diatribe by an idiot that so wants to be a man and yet talks with a shrill tone that makes listening to a fire alarm seem pleasant. She needs to get voice lessons and someone to emulate besides that other asshole, Keithie Olberfurhor.
What ever she was saying could have been utterly brilliant but who cares, she's awful and a bore. Another problem is that she isn't stating anything that many before her and anyone that actually pays attention already knows...... for me to watch her show, I would have to turn the sound down and read the closed caption........ that is if I could actually give a shit about what she has to say.......... I don't. I can't imagine how obnoxious an offspring her and Olberfurhor would have if Olberfurhor had testes to harvest sperm from to implant in Maddow's eggs, unfortunately Maddow is obviously missing the ovaries to produce the eggs and the other "stuff" to make her a woman....... then again Olberfurhor, if he had balls, could act like the earthworm he is and fertilize himself. But I digress...... I would rather listen to Stephen Hawking recite names out of an Icelandic phone book than listen to Rachel say anything.
Brilliant stuff (and not partisan, so calm down).
YouTube - MSNBC's Rachel Maddow: The myth of the Anti-Incumbency movement - 'Just not true'
Brilliant stuff (and not partisan, so calm down).
YouTube - MSNBC's Rachel Maddow: The myth of the Anti-Incumbency movement - 'Just not true'
How is it possible that anyone could actually sit through this whiny diatribe by an idiot that so wants to be a man and yet talks with a shrill tone that makes listening to a fire alarm seem pleasant. She needs to get voice lessons and someone to emulate besides that other asshole, Keithie Olberfurhor.
What ever she was saying could have been utterly brilliant but who cares, she's awful and a bore. Another problem is that she isn't stating anything that many before her and anyone that actually pays attention already knows...... for me to watch her show, I would have to turn the sound down and read the closed caption........ that is if I could actually give a shit about what she has to say.......... I don't. I can't imagine how obnoxious an offspring her and Olberfurhor would have if Olberfurhor had testes to harvest sperm from to implant in Maddow's eggs, unfortunately Maddow is obviously missing the ovaries to produce the eggs and the other "stuff" to make her a woman....... then again Olberfurhor, if he had balls, could act like the earthworm he is and fertilize himself. But I digress...... I would rather listen to Stephen Hawking recite names out of an Icelandic phone book than listen to Rachel say anything.
Brilliant stuff (and not partisan, so calm down).
YouTube - MSNBC's Rachel Maddow: The myth of the Anti-Incumbency movement - 'Just not true'
How is it possible that anyone could actually sit through this whiny diatribe by an idiot that so wants to be a man and yet talks with a shrill tone that makes listening to a fire alarm seem pleasant. She needs to get voice lessons and someone to emulate besides that other asshole, Keithie Olberfurhor.
What ever she was saying could have been utterly brilliant but who cares, she's awful and a bore. Another problem is that she isn't stating anything that many before her and anyone that actually pays attention already knows...... for me to watch her show, I would have to turn the sound down and read the closed caption........ that is if I could actually give a shit about what she has to say.......... I don't. I can't imagine how obnoxious an offspring her and Olberfurhor would have if Olberfurhor had testes to harvest sperm from to implant in Maddow's eggs, unfortunately Maddow is obviously missing the ovaries to produce the eggs and the other "stuff" to make her a woman....... then again Olberfurhor, if he had balls, could act like the earthworm he is and fertilize himself. But I digress...... I would rather listen to Stephen Hawking recite names out of an Icelandic phone book than listen to Rachel say anything.
She really bugs you, doesn't she??? You can't name anything she says that's a lie, can you?? So instead you attack her as a person. What a chicken shit bitch you are. Why not be specific and state something she has said that you can prove is wrong?? Or can't you do that???
she mocks the AP, the NYT, reuters, the beltway media..
frankly, i don't know why the LMSM-conspiracy nutjobs don't love this segment.
Brilliant stuff (and not partisan, so calm down).
...
Brilliant stuff (and not partisan, so calm down).
...
The incumbents are winning? Does she have a crystal ball or something because the last time I checked, it's not November 2010.
Could this lady get any dumber?
she mocks the AP, the NYT, reuters, the beltway media..
frankly, i don't know why the LMSM-conspiracy nutjobs don't love this segment.
I dont love this segment because its factually innacurate.
Brilliant stuff (and not partisan, so calm down).
...
The incumbents are winning? Does she have a crystal ball or something because the last time I checked, it's not November 2010.
Could this lady get any dumber?
Primaries have incumbents genius. Remember, the big Tea Party thing (one of their big things) was to hold Republican 'RINO' types accountable.
The incumbents are winning? Does she have a crystal ball or something because the last time I checked, it's not November 2010.
Could this lady get any dumber?
Primaries have incumbents genius. Remember, the big Tea Party thing (one of their big things) was to hold Republican 'RINO' types accountable.
So let's wait till November to see what happens. It's hard for you and Madcow to understand simple logic. Why is that?
Primaries have incumbents genius. Remember, the big Tea Party thing (one of their big things) was to hold Republican 'RINO' types accountable.
So let's wait till November to see what happens. It's hard for you and Madcow to understand simple logic. Why is that?
Ok, so you admit that incumbency applies to primaries, you admit Maddow is right, you admit you're stupid for claiming otherwise...
...without objection the motion passes.
How is it possible that anyone could actually sit through this whiny diatribe by an idiot that so wants to be a man and yet talks with a shrill tone that makes listening to a fire alarm seem pleasant. She needs to get voice lessons and someone to emulate besides that other asshole, Keithie Olberfurhor.
What ever she was saying could have been utterly brilliant but who cares, she's awful and a bore. Another problem is that she isn't stating anything that many before her and anyone that actually pays attention already knows...... for me to watch her show, I would have to turn the sound down and read the closed caption........ that is if I could actually give a shit about what she has to say.......... I don't. I can't imagine how obnoxious an offspring her and Olberfurhor would have if Olberfurhor had testes to harvest sperm from to implant in Maddow's eggs, unfortunately Maddow is obviously missing the ovaries to produce the eggs and the other "stuff" to make her a woman....... then again Olberfurhor, if he had balls, could act like the earthworm he is and fertilize himself. But I digress...... I would rather listen to Stephen Hawking recite names out of an Icelandic phone book than listen to Rachel say anything.
She really bugs you, doesn't she??? You can't name anything she says that's a lie, can you?? So instead you attack her as a person. What a chicken shit bitch you are. Why not be specific and state something she has said that you can prove is wrong?? Or can't you do that???
Not that I don't already know the answer, but I'll ask anyway. Do you consider Beck to be a liar?
Answer my question first and I will answer yours.Brilliant stuff (and not partisan, so calm down).
YouTube - MSNBC's Rachel Maddow: The myth of the Anti-Incumbency movement - 'Just not true'
How is it possible that anyone could actually sit through this whiny diatribe by an idiot that so wants to be a man and yet talks with a shrill tone that makes listening to a fire alarm seem pleasant. She needs to get voice lessons and someone to emulate besides that other asshole, Keithie Olberfurhor.
What ever she was saying could have been utterly brilliant but who cares, she's awful and a bore. Another problem is that she isn't stating anything that many before her and anyone that actually pays attention already knows...... for me to watch her show, I would have to turn the sound down and read the closed caption........ that is if I could actually give a shit about what she has to say.......... I don't. I can't imagine how obnoxious an offspring her and Olberfurhor would have if Olberfurhor had testes to harvest sperm from to implant in Maddow's eggs, unfortunately Maddow is obviously missing the ovaries to produce the eggs and the other "stuff" to make her a woman....... then again Olberfurhor, if he had balls, could act like the earthworm he is and fertilize himself. But I digress...... I would rather listen to Stephen Hawking recite names out of an Icelandic phone book than listen to Rachel say anything.
She really bugs you, doesn't she??? You can't name anything she says that's a lie, can you?? So instead you attack her as a person. What a chicken shit bitch you are. Why not be specific and state something she has said that you can prove is wrong?? Or can't you do that???
She really bugs you, doesn't she??? You can't name anything she says that's a lie, can you?? So instead you attack her as a person. What a chicken shit bitch you are. Why not be specific and state something she has said that you can prove is wrong?? Or can't you do that???
Not that I don't already know the answer, but I'll ask anyway. Do you consider Beck to be a liar?
Do you think you're that slick???
How is it possible that anyone could actually sit through this whiny diatribe by an idiot that so wants to be a man and yet talks with a shrill tone that makes listening to a fire alarm seem pleasant. She needs to get voice lessons and someone to emulate besides that other asshole, Keithie Olberfurhor.
What ever she was saying could have been utterly brilliant but who cares, she's awful and a bore. Another problem is that she isn't stating anything that many before her and anyone that actually pays attention already knows...... for me to watch her show, I would have to turn the sound down and read the closed caption........ that is if I could actually give a shit about what she has to say.......... I don't. I can't imagine how obnoxious an offspring her and Olberfurhor would have if Olberfurhor had testes to harvest sperm from to implant in Maddow's eggs, unfortunately Maddow is obviously missing the ovaries to produce the eggs and the other "stuff" to make her a woman....... then again Olberfurhor, if he had balls, could act like the earthworm he is and fertilize himself. But I digress...... I would rather listen to Stephen Hawking recite names out of an Icelandic phone book than listen to Rachel say anything.
She really bugs you, doesn't she??? You can't name anything she says that's a lie, can you?? So instead you attack her as a person. What a chicken shit bitch you are. Why not be specific and state something she has said that you can prove is wrong?? Or can't you do that???
No, she doesn't bother me, I don't watch or listen to her. If she is on a television at Best Buy, I would leave. I thought that with my post even a spider monkey would have understood that I would just as soon go to a Korean nail salon and have them stick hot bamboo under my fingernails than listen to that shim. I wouldn't know if anything she says is wrong, I don't care enough about her opinion to bother checking!
