- May 20, 2009
- 144,520
- 66,932
- 2,330
Earth has a fever and Libruls are the rectal thermometer giving us constant, but incorrect updates
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Just google "Glacier Girl" or "The Lost Squadron". You will find that hundreds of so called "annual layers" & 265'ft of ice formed on The Lost Squadron in just 46 years. This means the worlds thickest ice sheet formed in under 2000 years.
If word of this ever got out the global warming scientist would be out of work. Global warming scientist are the most well funded in the world even beating cancer research.
Clinton / Gore global initiative has made $8 billion of this scheme so far. If you think the Clinton credit default swap derivatives that created the sub-prime bubble were fun then you are going to love his carbon swap derivatives.
Just google "Glacier Girl" or "The Lost Squadron". You will find that hundreds of so called "annual layers" & 265'ft of ice formed on The Lost Squadron in just 46 years. This means the worlds thickest ice sheet formed in under 2000 years.
If word of this ever got out the global warming scientist would be out of work. Global warming scientist are the most well funded in the world even beating cancer research.
Clinton / Gore global initiative has made $8 billion of this scheme so far. If you think the Clinton credit default swap derivatives that created the sub-prime bubble were fun then you are going to love his carbon swap derivatives.
Excuse me lie telling Old Rocks in the head !!!Just google "Glacier Girl" or "The Lost Squadron". You will find that hundreds of so called "annual layers" & 265'ft of ice formed on The Lost Squadron in just 46 years. This means the worlds thickest ice sheet formed in under 2000 years.
If word of this ever got out the global warming scientist would be out of work. Global warming scientist are the most well funded in the world even beating cancer research.
Clinton / Gore global initiative has made $8 billion of this scheme so far. If you think the Clinton credit default swap derivatives that created the sub-prime bubble were fun then you are going to love his carbon swap derivatives.
First, that was Phil Gramm's baby, not Clinton's.
Second, care to back up your accusations with a link or two? Otherwise, you stand as just another ignoramous spouting idiocy, like Frank and Doooodeeee.
Just google "Glacier Girl" or "The Lost Squadron". You will find that hundreds of so called "annual layers" & 265'ft of ice formed on The Lost Squadron in just 46 years. This means the worlds thickest ice sheet formed in under 2000 years.
If word of this ever got out the global warming scientist would be out of work. Global warming scientist are the most well funded in the world even beating cancer research.
Clinton / Gore global initiative has made $8 billion of this scheme so far. If you think the Clinton credit default swap derivatives that created the sub-prime bubble were fun then you are going to love his carbon swap derivatives.
There aint nothing worth reading in the posts of this thread. When I see people quoting "experts" than I see people who are completely ignorant.
Hurricanes are good for the USA, sure devastating to the coast but they push moisture into the interior increasing crop yeilds.
Bottom line is we do not effect the weather, nobody is even close to proving we do, its all propaganda which has made 200 million for Al Gore.
From your site;
Urban Heat Islands: Hotter Cities (ActionBioscience)
Do urban heat islands affect global climate?
Urban heat islands themselves are not responsible for global warming because they are small-scale phenomena and cover only a tiny fraction of the Earth’s surface area. However, there are some urban to global scale connections that are worth noting:
Urban heat islands are models for climate change research.Approximately half of the world’s population currently lives in cities, and this value is expected to increase to 61% by 2030.16 The high rate of urbanization, particularly in the tropics, means that increasing numbers of people will be exposed to impacts resulting from heat islands in the future.
Urban areas have historically been the site of some of the earliest established observation stations that are used to help construct the global surface temperature record used to document large scale climate changes. The effects of urbanization, and consequently urban heat islands, on these stations over time can lead to some “contamination” of the temperature record. The ability to fully remove these influences remains the subject of some debate since changes can occur independently of population17 and current techniques used to remove urban effects may be inadequate.17-19
Most greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global climate change come from urban areas. These emissions therefore contribute to both local and global scale weather and climate modification.20 Further urbanization will increase emissions originating from cities. Investigation of the larger scale impacts of urban emissions is seen as an important area of future research.20
The climate modifications that have occurred in large cities over the past century show similarities in terms of the rates and magnitude expected with projected future climate changes. Therefore cities may serve as a model for assessing the impacts of, and adaptation strategies to, climate change on both local and global scales.4
In case you are color blind, that was pointed out in the first sentence of the article.
In case you are color blind, that was pointed out in the first sentence of the article.
Your end of post highlights go to radical nonsense.
Since we were told that global warming causes more hurricanes and more violent hurricanes does this mean that global warming is under control? Or is global warming now responsible for less violent and less frequent hurricanes? and if so, why is that a bad thing?
Quiet Atlantic hurricane season a boon for insurers | U.S. | Reuters
Look 'E', the physics of global warming was established in 1896. Here is where you can read the history of the investigation of GHGs;
The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect
This is an American Institute of Physics site, not some bloggers post.
As far as it being the sun, with a long solar minimum, and a strong and persistant La Nina, we should have had some very cold years for 2007, 2008, and 2009. Instead they all placed in the top ten warmest on record.
Also, commenting on science, one should give one's sources. So what is the scientific source for your opinion?
In case you are color blind, that was pointed out in the first sentence of the article.
Your end of post highlights go to radical nonsense.
Your definition of radical seems to be anything that has to do with real science. Here is the home source of that article;
ActionBioscience - promoting bioscience literacy
Look 'E', the physics of global warming was established in 1896. Here is where you can read the history of the investigation of GHGs;
The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect
This is an American Institute of Physics site, not some bloggers post.
As far as it being the sun, with a long solar minimum, and a strong and persistant La Nina, we should have had some very cold years for 2007, 2008, and 2009. Instead they all placed in the top ten warmest on record.
Also, commenting on science, one should give one's sources. So what is the scientific source for your opinion?
Once again, you're measuring geological and astonomical occurances with a stop watch. The very minor changes in the TSI add up to big impacts for us only because we operate so comfortably within such a narrow range of temperature.
When the TSI drops by 3 on a scale of 1365 across multiple decades, we get the Little Ice Age. When it rises by the same amount, we get 1998. The actual swing in temperature is only about 2 degrees.
Our civilization has worked pretty well in the upper degree of that 2 degree span. When we drop to the lower degree of that 2 degree span, which is what you campaign to do, we find planetary famine and death by exposure.
When it starts to warm, we get things like the Age of Reason and Pax Brittania.
Are you sure that cooling is the right goal to pursue?
In case you are color blind, that was pointed out in the first sentence of the article.
Your end of post highlights go to radical nonsense.
Your definition of radical seems to be anything that has to do with real science. Here is the home source of that article;
ActionBioscience - promoting bioscience literacy