Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
asked and answered by him. Explained as well. In fact, as I stated, at least 50 times. so, the option is to either accept his response or find another option for discussion. cause all you're doing is repeating yourself over and over and over and over. You do know that right?Wow, look at you, how many posts now has SSDD stated all you have is a mathematical model and to actually post observed measured results? And still you fail to provide observations showing energy moving spontaneously from cold to warm. Fk dude, must be over 50 posts asking for that observation evidence. Still nothing. And if radiation must come through the atmosphere, then you should have observation of that! Post it. That wouldn’t be a mathematical model. Instead, it would be actually measured. I get it that confuses youSince you don't believe in physics, you have no basis for physics discussion except for anti-science trolling. You fantasize non-science in order to deny th e CMB actually does hit the earth and was discovered by actual observed and measured experiments on earth. You have not proved otherwise. We are getting bored of your current anti-science mantras. Got anything new?
"Believe" in physics? Are you kidding? The whole point of physics is to get beyond having to "believe". Belief is a religious term. Physics is about actual understanding via observation, experiment, testing and measurement. Physics doesn't require belief. Faith requires belief.
And again...its to bad that you can't grasp the concept of resonant frequencies.
And it is not me who is anti science. I am asking for you to provide evidence to support your claims...that is by definition, the way science works. You, on the other hand are asking me to believe...and when I won't take your claim on faith, you tell me that I don't "believe" in physics...as if physics required belief. Grab yourself a dictionary and look up the words physics and religion. Now tell me which one includes the word belief in the definition.
You are asking me to take a claim on faith with no actual observed, measured evidence in support of that claim....and as much as you wish it to be true...being fooled by instrumentation is not evidence.
Nope, you have nothing new. Just the same distractions and troll mentality.
You don't like that use of the word belief? OK. I will reword it. You don't accept the mathematical models of physics as a method for codifying experimental observations and measurements. That's ironic since you misuse the models right and left.
to bad that you can't grasp the concept of resonant frequencies
You are just being a troll again. We all know that the cold radiation must come through the warm atmosphere to be detected by the resonant amplifiers. You are pretending to confuse the actual radiation with the detection method. But you already know that, and prefer to be a troll.
how many posts now has SSDD stated all you have is a mathematical model and to actually post observed measured results?
CMB was discovered using an actual telescope receiving actual radiation.
And if radiation must come through the atmosphere, then you should have observation of that!
Discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation - Wikipedia
And since you can't seem to pull anything else, I supposed you will never convince him or me about energy moving from cold to warm spontaneously.
asked and answered by him. Explained as well.
Yes, his "Waves were detected without hitting the telescope" claim was hilarious.
cause all you're doing is repeating yourself over and over and over and over.
Yes, I'll keep pointing out SSDD's errors, over and over.
I supposed you will never convince him or me about energy moving from cold to warm spontaneously.
Right, keep ignoring the evidence, like the picture of the "cold energy" from space.