Questions raised over feds' consistency on 'terrorism' definition in wake of shooting

RoadVirus

<insert pithy title here>
Oct 22, 2008
5,277
579
88
Illinois
Skinhead Sikh Temple shooting = Terrorism
Muslim soldier shouting "Allah Ackbar!" while killing fellow soldiers = Not terrorism

Questions are being raised about the consistency of the government's standard for what qualifies as "terrorism," as recent high-profile shootings bear that label while tragedies like the Fort Hood massacre do not.

--snip--

The shooting earlier this month at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin where six were killed by an alleged neo-Nazi military veteran was publicly described by the attorney general as an act of terrorism motivated by hate.

--snip--

But the federal government has declined to label other tragedies as such.

A recruitment center shooting in the summer of 2009 by a man who described himself as an operative for Al Qaeda in Yemen was not handled as a terrorism case. It was prosecuted in an Arkansas state court.

And the Fort Hood massacre in November 2009, when 13 were killed and more than 30 wounded, has never been described officially as an act of terrorism even though the alleged shooter shouted "Allahu Akbar," or God is great, when he opened fire.

Questions raised over feds&#39; consistency on &#39;terrorism&#39; definition in wake of shootings | Fox News
 
Skinhead Sikh Temple shooting = Terrorism
Muslim soldier shouting "Allah Ackbar!" while killing fellow soldiers = Not terrorism

Questions are being raised about the consistency of the government's standard for what qualifies as "terrorism," as recent high-profile shootings bear that label while tragedies like the Fort Hood massacre do not.

--snip--

The shooting earlier this month at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin where six were killed by an alleged neo-Nazi military veteran was publicly described by the attorney general as an act of terrorism motivated by hate.

--snip--

But the federal government has declined to label other tragedies as such.

A recruitment center shooting in the summer of 2009 by a man who described himself as an operative for Al Qaeda in Yemen was not handled as a terrorism case. It was prosecuted in an Arkansas state court.

And the Fort Hood massacre in November 2009, when 13 were killed and more than 30 wounded, has never been described officially as an act of terrorism even though the alleged shooter shouted "Allahu Akbar," or God is great, when he opened fire.

Questions raised over feds' consistency on 'terrorism' definition in wake of shootings | Fox News

Holding the left to the same standard is NOT part of the plan in Holder's book. And of course the Muslims are peaceful so no Muslim that happens to shoot 43 people is a terrorist just a disgruntled worker.
 

Forum List

Back
Top