Questions NOT Asked at Democratic Debate

[Jarhead]

Remember the first Republican debate? Why were these questions not asked at the Democratic Debate?

1. Hillary's lies about her secret email server. Instead, her claim that she has been "transparent" was left unchallenged. Compare this to the attack on Trump for not promising to support the other GOP candidates.

2. Late term abortions. GOP candidates were grilled over saving the life of the mother. Why weren't the Dems asked to specify their positions on late term abortions and harvesting baby parts?

3. Religion. GOP candidates were asked about their religious beliefs and how that might affect their decisions. Why weren't the Dems asked the same question?

I agree with Hillary that there is a vast conspiracy in this country to hoodwink the American public. However, it is not coming from the Right.

O'Malley's a Papist, Webb's a Baptist, Bernie's a Jew, though non-observant and married to a Papist, which probably makes him a self-loathing Jew to the Zionists, and Hillary's adept in black magic. Nothing new here.

the fact that you need to imply people are saying things that are not being said pretty much makes it clear that you have very little to offer the conversation.

And, of course, you still have not answered the simple question as to why Hillary deemed it best to use a private server for government emails.

 

[g5000]

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

I showed you mine, now show me yours. Let's hear your stupid theory. Put it out there, hack.

My theory is quite simple.

All government emails are governed by the records act. When a government employee leaves office, the emails are preserved by archives and referred to when necessary...for historical purposes or investigative purposes. When such employee leaves office, he/she may delete emails off his/her computer, but they are preserved on the .gov server.

She did not want many of her emails to become public record.

Quite simple.

Now...the question is .....why?

Exactly what I said. She did not need her personal emails to be fodder for Rush Limbaugh to spend three hours talking about the political implications of her choice of maxi pads.

I understand. But if she wanted to keep her private emails private, she should have used her private email server for her private emails.....which she did

My question is why did she use a private email server for her government business. Why did she create a situation where she could delete government emails if she opted to? You do realize that what she did opened the door for her not adhering to the public records act if she so desired.

And again, that's fine if there was a good reason for it......but she wont give one.

and you are OK with it.

Which speaks volumes.

I'm not okay with it. But it wasn't against the rules, and nobody gives a shit.

The hacks will have to find somewhere else to make political hay. I'm sure they have their best men working on that right now.

 

[Two Thumbs]

What part of us being $18 Trillion in debt, don't you fucking understand?

 

[BULLDOG]

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

her emails as SoS ARE public by law. How can you criticize me when you aren't aware that she deleted emails and her emails are public by law?

Careful

She worked for the State Department. If some of the emails is considered a national security risk if made public(which is what some conservatives have unknowingly claimed) then the public records act is blocked.

This also undermines the public need to know involving the reason she had a second server. Just asking that question could be considered a security risk.

That is, unless, the private server never contained such high leveled information.

I did not realize you were so naïve.
My mistake for wasting my time with you.
But just an FYI....
Public record does not mean "for the public to view at their leisure"
It means it is the property of the people of the United States and must be preserved and it is not the private possession of the government employee who wrote it or received it.

And you are debating this issue? You don't even know the basics.

WRONG AGAIN PINHEAD
public record
n. any information, minutes, files, accounts or other records which a governmental body is required to maintain, and which must be accessible to scrutiny by the public. This includes the files of most legal actions. A court will take "judicial notice" of a public record (including hearsay in the record) introduced as evidence. For example: a recorded deed to show transfer of title or a criminal judgment are both public records.

 

[Jarhead]

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

I showed you mine, now show me yours. Let's hear your stupid theory. Put it out there, hack.

My theory is quite simple.

All government emails are governed by the records act. When a government employee leaves office, the emails are preserved by archives and referred to when necessary...for historical purposes or investigative purposes. When such employee leaves office, he/she may delete emails off his/her computer, but they are preserved on the .gov server.

She did not want many of her emails to become public record.

Quite simple.

Now...the question is .....why?

Exactly what I said. She did not need her personal emails to be fodder for Rush Limbaugh to spend three hours talking about the political implications of her choice of maxi pads.

I understand. But if she wanted to keep her private emails private, she should have used her private email server for her private emails.....which she did

My question is why did she use a private email server for her government business. Why did she create a situation where she could delete government emails if she opted to? You do realize that what she did opened the door for her not adhering to the public records act if she so desired.

And again, that's fine if there was a good reason for it......but she wont give one.

and you are OK with it.

Which speaks volumes.

I'm not okay with it. But it wasn't against the rules, and nobody gives a shit.

The hacks will have to find somewhere else to make political hay. I'm sure they have their best men working on that right now.

That is the question....why does nobody give a shit? She refuses to give a valid answer as why she did it....and all agree that it opened the door to her avoiding the public records act.

The fact that there was no "rule" for it makes it a loophole.....and it appears the SoS capitalized on a loophole.

And that is fine if it was innocent....but questions her integrity if it were intentional.

So why would anyone who is considering voting for her not interested in finding out if it were intentionally capitalizing on a loophole for personal gain or just a coincidence and innocent?

 

[bendog]

Remember the first Republican debate? Why were these questions not asked at the Democratic Debate?

1. Hillary's lies about her secret email server. Instead, her claim that she has been "transparent" was left unchallenged. Compare this to the attack on Trump for not promising to support the other GOP candidates.

2. Late term abortions. GOP candidates were grilled over saving the life of the mother. Why weren't the Dems asked to specify their positions on late term abortions and harvesting baby parts?

3. Religion. GOP candidates were asked about their religious beliefs and how that might affect their decisions. Why weren't the Dems asked the same question?

I agree with Hillary that there is a vast conspiracy in this country to hoodwink the American public. However, it is not coming from the Right.

O'Malley's a Papist, Webb's a Baptist, Bernie's a Jew, though non-observant and married to a Papist, which probably makes him a self-loathing Jew to the Zionists, and Hillary's adept in black magic. Nothing new here.

the fact that you need to imply people are saying things that are not being said pretty much makes it clear that you have very little to offer the conversation.

And, of course, you still have not answered the simple question as to why Hillary deemed it best to use a private server for government emails.

Because the OP is stinky bait. The debate is not for you; it's for people who might vote dem. And what you think is irrelevant, and fair game to be mocked.

 

[Jarhead]

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

her emails as SoS ARE public by law. How can you criticize me when you aren't aware that she deleted emails and her emails are public by law?

Careful

She worked for the State Department. If some of the emails is considered a national security risk if made public(which is what some conservatives have unknowingly claimed) then the public records act is blocked.

This also undermines the public need to know involving the reason she had a second server. Just asking that question could be considered a security risk.

That is, unless, the private server never contained such high leveled information.

I did not realize you were so naïve.
My mistake for wasting my time with you.
But just an FYI....
Public record does not mean "for the public to view at their leisure"
It means it is the property of the people of the United States and must be preserved and it is not the private possession of the government employee who wrote it or received it.

And you are debating this issue? You don't even know the basics.

WRONG AGAIN PINHEAD
public record
n. any information, minutes, files, accounts or other records which a governmental body is required to maintain, and which must be accessible to scrutiny by the public. This includes the files of most legal actions. A court will take "judicial notice" of a public record (including hearsay in the record) introduced as evidence. For example: a recorded deed to show transfer of title or a criminal judgment are both public records.

The Public Records Act refers to government records and is not the typical definition of public records found in the dictionary....you buffoon.

The public records act does not govern public records such as deeds and legal findings you moron.

Geez...I'm dealing with fucking idiots. This is a debate. If you don't know your swhit, don't get involved.

 

[Jarhead]

Remember the first Republican debate? Why were these questions not asked at the Democratic Debate?

1. Hillary's lies about her secret email server. Instead, her claim that she has been "transparent" was left unchallenged. Compare this to the attack on Trump for not promising to support the other GOP candidates.

2. Late term abortions. GOP candidates were grilled over saving the life of the mother. Why weren't the Dems asked to specify their positions on late term abortions and harvesting baby parts?

3. Religion. GOP candidates were asked about their religious beliefs and how that might affect their decisions. Why weren't the Dems asked the same question?

I agree with Hillary that there is a vast conspiracy in this country to hoodwink the American public. However, it is not coming from the Right.

O'Malley's a Papist, Webb's a Baptist, Bernie's a Jew, though non-observant and married to a Papist, which probably makes him a self-loathing Jew to the Zionists, and Hillary's adept in black magic. Nothing new here.

the fact that you need to imply people are saying things that are not being said pretty much makes it clear that you have very little to offer the conversation.

And, of course, you still have not answered the simple question as to why Hillary deemed it best to use a private server for government emails.

Because the OP is stinky bait. The debate is not for you; it's for people who might vote dem. And what you think is irrelevant, and fair game to be mocked.

in other words.....you don't have an answer and you don't want to know the answer because you prefer being in the dark.

I pity you.

 

[Iron Head]

Other questions worth asking:

- What really happened to Vince Foster?

- Do you think that Bill needs professional intervention to stop him from being a sexual predator?

- How much did you and Bill have to pay that boy to marry and impregnate that ugly ass daughter of yours? Follow up: did you pay him personally or did the money originate in Saudi Arabi?

- Do you and Bill fuck anymore or is the marriage a sham that exists for political show?

- What happened over the past 20 years to make you go from a fringe leftist to a full-on stinking socialist?

- Was Amb. Stephens travel itinerary for his time in Libya contained in an email on your server, thereby making it pretty much available to any half-assed hacker? Follow-up what other sensitive information did you expose to hack and dissemination to our enemies?

- Have you lost one moment of sleep due to a troubled conscience from what happened in Benghazi, or are you just as much of a sociopath as Bill?

- How much of that Clinton Foundation money has gone into your campaign and how much of it has gone into your pocket and into the pockets of Bill's rape victims as hush money?

Why did those FBI files on political enemies of yours turn up in the White House, where they do not belong, during Bill's reign?

We all know that Bill has been disbarred. Have you also been disbarred for your unethical conduct?

- Do you still actively gamble on cattle futures and other derivatives?

- Were you fucking Vince Foster?

-How many women did Bill sexually assault in the White House?

If elected will you steal a lot of shit from the White House when you leave office like you and Bill did when he left office?

Were you involved with Bill in selling our missile technology secrets to the Chinese?

- Why in the world should any sane person believe one word out of your mouth?

Thank you. It's good to see a long list of crazy unfounded accusations that have been made over the years about Hillary by the childish right wing. It makes her even more impressive when you consider all the crap she has had to put up with.

What, exactly, is unfounded?

 

[BULLDOG]

Other questions worth asking:

- What really happened to Vince Foster?

- Do you think that Bill needs professional intervention to stop him from being a sexual predator?

- How much did you and Bill have to pay that boy to marry and impregnate that ugly ass daughter of yours? Follow up: did you pay him personally or did the money originate in Saudi Arabi?

- Do you and Bill fuck anymore or is the marriage a sham that exists for political show?

- What happened over the past 20 years to make you go from a fringe leftist to a full-on stinking socialist?

- Was Amb. Stephens travel itinerary for his time in Libya contained in an email on your server, thereby making it pretty much available to any half-assed hacker? Follow-up what other sensitive information did you expose to hack and dissemination to our enemies?

- Have you lost one moment of sleep due to a troubled conscience from what happened in Benghazi, or are you just as much of a sociopath as Bill?

- How much of that Clinton Foundation money has gone into your campaign and how much of it has gone into your pocket and into the pockets of Bill's rape victims as hush money?

Why did those FBI files on political enemies of yours turn up in the White House, where they do not belong, during Bill's reign?

We all know that Bill has been disbarred. Have you also been disbarred for your unethical conduct?

- Do you still actively gamble on cattle futures and other derivatives?

- Were you fucking Vince Foster?

-How many women did Bill sexually assault in the White House?

If elected will you steal a lot of shit from the White House when you leave office like you and Bill did when he left office?

Were you involved with Bill in selling our missile technology secrets to the Chinese?

- Why in the world should any sane person believe one word out of your mouth?

Thank you. It's good to see a long list of crazy unfounded accusations that have been made over the years about Hillary by the childish right wing. It makes her even more impressive when you consider all the crap she has had to put up with.

What, exactly, is unfounded?

Your stupid list.

 

[jillian]

Remember the first Republican debate? Why were these questions not asked at the Democratic Debate?

1. Hillary's lies about her secret email server. Instead, her claim that she has been "transparent" was left unchallenged. Compare this to the attack on Trump for not promising to support the other GOP candidates.

2. Late term abortions. GOP candidates were grilled over saving the life of the mother. Why weren't the Dems asked to specify their positions on late term abortions and harvesting baby parts?

3. Religion. GOP candidates were asked about their religious beliefs and how that might affect their decisions. Why weren't the Dems asked the same question?

I agree with Hillary that there is a vast conspiracy in this country to hoodwink the American public. However, it is not coming from the Right.

the trumped up email/Benghazi thing was already admitted by the almost- was speaker of the house as the BS that it is.

silly wabbit.

stop whining.

 

[Conservative65]

It wasn't a debate. It was a Democrat circle jerk.

 

[Conservative65]

Other questions worth asking:

- What really happened to Vince Foster?

- Do you think that Bill needs professional intervention to stop him from being a sexual predator?

- How much did you and Bill have to pay that boy to marry and impregnate that ugly ass daughter of yours? Follow up: did you pay him personally or did the money originate in Saudi Arabi?

- Do you and Bill fuck anymore or is the marriage a sham that exists for political show?

- What happened over the past 20 years to make you go from a fringe leftist to a full-on stinking socialist?

- Was Amb. Stephens travel itinerary for his time in Libya contained in an email on your server, thereby making it pretty much available to any half-assed hacker? Follow-up what other sensitive information did you expose to hack and dissemination to our enemies?

- Have you lost one moment of sleep due to a troubled conscience from what happened in Benghazi, or are you just as much of a sociopath as Bill?

- How much of that Clinton Foundation money has gone into your campaign and how much of it has gone into your pocket and into the pockets of Bill's rape victims as hush money?

Why did those FBI files on political enemies of yours turn up in the White House, where they do not belong, during Bill's reign?

We all know that Bill has been disbarred. Have you also been disbarred for your unethical conduct?

- Do you still actively gamble on cattle futures and other derivatives?

- Were you fucking Vince Foster?

-How many women did Bill sexually assault in the White House?

If elected will you steal a lot of shit from the White House when you leave office like you and Bill did when he left office?

Were you involved with Bill in selling our missile technology secrets to the Chinese?

- Why in the world should any sane person believe one word out of your mouth?

Thank you. It's good to see a long list of crazy unfounded accusations that have been made over the years about Hillary by the childish right wing. It makes her even more impressive when you consider all the crap she has had to put up with.

What, exactly, is unfounded?

Your stupid list.

Seems you define unfounded as "I don't agree".

 

[kiwiman127]

ok...so since all of you Hillary supporters feel the email server thing is nothing but a right wing conspiracy.....

I dare one of you to answer this very basic question......bet none of you give an answer that makes sense....prove me wrong.....

Why did she set up a separate server?

Nobody cares.

You don't speak for everybody.

Trust me.

Nobody cares. Except hacks.

True!
The problem is that the Repubs and in particular the extreme element of the GOP, over-kill every "scandal" so much, it's like the story about the kid who screams wolf. After awhile no one listens or cares, except for the over zealous fringe on the right.
Look, I have stated over and over that I don't exactly love the Clinton's. I never voted for Willie and I will never vote for Hillary. But then I feel the same way about the far right, who I think are too extreme for me.

 

[MathewSmith]

Looks like it's more than democrats pushing liberal agenda. It's like the whole establishment wants to see America turning into liberal hell.

 

[Care4all]

See?

All you guys keep doing is blame me for asking the question....yet none of you have an answer.

And you are OK with it.

Hmmmm....think about it......she had her own server, deleted emails without a third party present....has no explanation for her own server....lied about it and got caught......and as opposed to asking questions, you will simply vote for her.

The epitome of an uninformed voter.

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

sparky.....if she deleted incriminating emails, how could they see her intent?

you are just WAYYYY behind on this story...and reading simply garbage sites, she simply deleted her private emails and archived only her government related emails, which is REQUIRED for all gvt employees, delete anything personal and archive only what is gvt related.

Second SHE DID NOT WIPE HER SERVER CLEAN as the right wing LIARS have said, she simply deleted her personal emails....

So they ALL ARE ON HER SERVER, and she turned in her server over a month ago and the FBI has gone through all of them, INCLUDING her private emails that were deleted....FBI said nothing was missing off the server, she never wiped the server clean, and they have accessed them all.

Got it now?

 

[Jarhead]

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

sparky.....if she deleted incriminating emails, how could they see her intent?

you are just WAYYYY behind on this story...and reading simply garbage sites, she simply deleted her private emails and archived only her government related emails, which is REQUIRED for all gvt employees, delete anything personal and archive only what is gvt related.

Second SHE DID NOT WIPE HER SERVER CLEAN as the right wing LIARS have said, she simply deleted her personal emails....

So they ALL ARE ON HER SERVER, and she turned in her server over a month ago and the FBI has gone through all of them, INCLUDING her private emails that were deleted....FBI said nothing was missing off the server, she never wiped the server clean, and they have accessed them all.

Got it now?

you are naïve.

The law states that you can delete emails that are personal when a government employee and leave those that are not personal on your computer. This is TRUE.

However, that is assuming the emails that are deleted are still on the government server so if there is a controversy; a situation; a question, they are retrievable.

What Hillary did was delete her emails that she claimed to be personal but there is no way the people (Us) can retri8eve them if there is a controversy, a question, a situation.

The issue is the server...you don't get it maybe....but the issue is the server. She did not delete her personal emails from her computer. She deleted the emails from the server...... all records of what she, independently claimed to be personal emails.

As for your bullshit attack on republicans......when they say she wiped her server clean....they are referring to her emails....not other crap on it that is irrelevant. Learn to comprehend....she admitted that she deleted all emails but printed the government business emails first.

Her emails are not on the server. She printed them. The FBI confiscated her server with the hopes that they may be able to retrieve what was deleted.

Pay attention.

Actually.....you haven't been.....so enough with you.

 

[paravani]

Remember the first Republican debate? Why were these questions not asked at the Democratic Debate?

1. Hillary's lies about her secret email server. Instead, her claim that she has been "transparent" was left unchallenged. Compare this to the attack on Trump for not promising to support the other GOP candidates.

2. Late term abortions. GOP candidates were grilled over saving the life of the mother. Why weren't the Dems asked to specify their positions on late term abortions and harvesting baby parts?

3. Religion. GOP candidates were asked about their religious beliefs and how that might affect their decisions. Why weren't the Dems asked the same question?

I agree with Hillary that there is a vast conspiracy in this country to hoodwink the American public. However, it is not coming from the Right.

Responses:

1. Hillary's lies about her secret email server. So far, HRC has not been charged with any crime. Unless and until she is charged, no one cares, and we'd rather discuss REAL issues.

2. Late term abortions. The Democratic Party supports women's right to control their own bodies. Contraception, "day-after drug", early-term, late-term -- those are all issues that Democrats consider to be between a woman and her physician. No Democratic candidate disputes that.

3. Religion. Democrats support the separation of church and state. Religion does not belong in any discussion of politics. None of the current crop of Democratic candidates has raised any religious concerns that would influence their political positions.