Questions NOT Asked at Democratic Debate

[amrchaos]

Uh.....excuse me.....far right wing nuts came up with the FEMA prison crap.

Just as far left wing nuts came up with the 9-11 inside job crap.

Should we define the entire left wing based on that?

Doesn't matter. You already believe so much crazy crap about Democrats till one more silly accusation won't hurt.

See?

All you guys keep doing is blame me for asking the question....yet none of you have an answer.

And you are OK with it.

Hmmmm....think about it......she had her own server, deleted emails without a third party present....has no explanation for her own server....lied about it and got caught......and as opposed to asking questions, you will simply vote for her.

The epitome of an uninformed voter.

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

 

[Conservative65]

Doesn't matter. You already believe so much crazy crap about Democrats till one more silly accusation won't hurt.

See?

All you guys keep doing is blame me for asking the question....yet none of you have an answer.

And you are OK with it.

Hmmmm....think about it......she had her own server, deleted emails without a third party present....has no explanation for her own server....lied about it and got caught......and as opposed to asking questions, you will simply vote for her.

The epitome of an uninformed voter.

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

Obvious to whom. Those of you who support her?

 

[Jarhead]

Uh.....excuse me.....far right wing nuts came up with the FEMA prison crap.

Just as far left wing nuts came up with the 9-11 inside job crap.

Should we define the entire left wing based on that?

Doesn't matter. You already believe so much crazy crap about Democrats till one more silly accusation won't hurt.

See?

All you guys keep doing is blame me for asking the question....yet none of you have an answer.

And you are OK with it.

Hmmmm....think about it......she had her own server, deleted emails without a third party present....has no explanation for her own server....lied about it and got caught......and as opposed to asking questions, you will simply vote for her.

The epitome of an uninformed voter.

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

I showed you mine, now show me yours. Let's hear your stupid theory. Put it out there, hack.

My theory is quite simple.

All government emails are governed by the records act. When a government employee leaves office, the emails are preserved by archives and referred to when necessary...for historical purposes or investigative purposes. When such employee leaves office, he/she may delete emails off his/her computer, but they are preserved on the .gov server.

She did not want many of her emails to become public record.

Quite simple.

Now...the question is .....why?

 

[peach174]

Other questions worth asking:

- What really happened to Vince Foster?

- Do you think that Bill needs professional intervention to stop him from being a sexual predator?

- How much did you and Bill have to pay that boy to marry and impregnate that ugly ass daughter of yours? Follow up: did you pay him personally or did the money originate in Saudi Arabi?

- Do you and Bill fuck anymore or is the marriage a sham that exists for political show?

- What happened over the past 20 years to make you go from a fringe leftist to a full-on stinking socialist?

- Was Amb. Stephens travel itinerary for his time in Libya contained in an email on your server, thereby making it pretty much available to any half-assed hacker? Follow-up what other sensitive information did you expose to hack and dissemination to our enemies?

- Have you lost one moment of sleep due to a troubled conscience from what happened in Benghazi, or are you just as much of a sociopath as Bill?

- How much of that Clinton Foundation money has gone into your campaign and how much of it has gone into your pocket and into the pockets of Bill's rape victims as hush money?

Why did those FBI files on political enemies of yours turn up in the White House, where they do not belong, during Bill's reign?

We all know that Bill has been disbarred. Have you also been disbarred for your unethical conduct?

- Do you still actively gamble on cattle futures and other derivatives?

- Were you fucking Vince Foster?

-How many women did Bill sexually assault in the White House?

If elected will you steal a lot of shit from the White House when you leave office like you and Bill did when he left office?

Were you involved with Bill in selling our missile technology secrets to the Chinese?

- Why in the world should any sane person believe one word out of your mouth?

Thank you. It's good to see a long list of crazy unfounded accusations that have been made over the years about Hillary by the childish right wing. It makes her even more impressive when you consider all the crap she has had to put up with.

What crap?
She admitted that she made a bad decision with her private e-mail server.
Just like she did in Benghazi and got 4 Americans killed by not pulling them out of there like the Brit's and Red Cross did. Of course she won't admit that. Look how long it took her to finally admit her mistake on having a private e-mail server
2 real bad decisions and people want her as POTUS?

 

[Jarhead]

Doesn't matter. You already believe so much crazy crap about Democrats till one more silly accusation won't hurt.

See?

All you guys keep doing is blame me for asking the question....yet none of you have an answer.

And you are OK with it.

Hmmmm....think about it......she had her own server, deleted emails without a third party present....has no explanation for her own server....lied about it and got caught......and as opposed to asking questions, you will simply vote for her.

The epitome of an uninformed voter.

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

sparky.....if she deleted incriminating emails, how could they see her intent?

 

[BULLDOG]

See?

All you guys keep doing is blame me for asking the question....yet none of you have an answer.

And you are OK with it.

Hmmmm....think about it......she had her own server, deleted emails without a third party present....has no explanation for her own server....lied about it and got caught......and as opposed to asking questions, you will simply vote for her.

The epitome of an uninformed voter.

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

Obvious to whom. Those of you who support her?

Obvious to any sane person.

 

[Jarhead]

Doesn't matter. You already believe so much crazy crap about Democrats till one more silly accusation won't hurt.

See?

All you guys keep doing is blame me for asking the question....yet none of you have an answer.

And you are OK with it.

Hmmmm....think about it......she had her own server, deleted emails without a third party present....has no explanation for her own server....lied about it and got caught......and as opposed to asking questions, you will simply vote for her.

The epitome of an uninformed voter.

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

her emails as SoS ARE public by law. How can you criticize me when you aren't aware that she deleted emails and her emails are public by law?

 

[Jarhead]

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

Obvious to whom. Those of you who support her?

Obvious to any sane person.

yet you still wont answer the question.

 

[amrchaos]

I just thought of something

If the investigators read the email from the private server, they already know why she set it up. The reason follows from the general topics of the emails.truth, it cou

Asking her maybe a political trap.

If she tells the truth, it could diminish her chances in the election.

If she lies she could be charged with a crime.

However, you don't need to ask her at all to find out the truth yourself. Just read her emails! Which they have!

they do not have all of the emails. She admittedly deleted 40% of them claiming them to be personal.

You can still surmise the general purpose of the server from the remaining 60% plus the remaining 40% can be recovered.

in other words, you are asking a question the investigators already know the answers to.

 

[Jarhead]

Uh.....excuse me.....far right wing nuts came up with the FEMA prison crap.

Just as far left wing nuts came up with the 9-11 inside job crap.

Should we define the entire left wing based on that?

Doesn't matter. You already believe so much crazy crap about Democrats till one more silly accusation won't hurt.

See?

All you guys keep doing is blame me for asking the question....yet none of you have an answer.

And you are OK with it.

Hmmmm....think about it......she had her own server, deleted emails without a third party present....has no explanation for her own server....lied about it and got caught......and as opposed to asking questions, you will simply vote for her.

The epitome of an uninformed voter.

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

true...but the question is....why would they not want to know? They prefer just voting for her without knowing why she did something so unusual and then lied about it?

Really?

 

[Jarhead]

I just thought of something

If the investigators read the email from the private server, they already know why she set it up. The reason follows from the general topics of the emails.truth, it cou

Asking her maybe a political trap.

If she tells the truth, it could diminish her chances in the election.

If she lies she could be charged with a crime.

However, you don't need to ask her at all to find out the truth yourself. Just read her emails! Which they have!

they do not have all of the emails. She admittedly deleted 40% of them claiming them to be personal.

You can still surmise the general purpose of the server from the remaining 60% plus the remaining 40% can be recovered.

in other words, you are asking a question the investigators already know the answers to.

look...

She was SoS for 4 years....MOST of her emails were legit SoS business....no doubt.
But she admitted to have wiped the server clean and gave the state department about 60% of them...claiming the other 40% were personal.
When asked for the server, she said it was blank...wiped clean.....and she said (paraphrased)....'trust me. I only deleted my personal emails'
SO now the FBI has the server.....but once it is wiped clean, it is nearly impossible to recover. However, they are seeking back up copies from the companies that oversaw and maintained her server.

They are doing what they can.

But it begs the question....why did she do it to begin with?

 

[amrchaos]

See?

All you guys keep doing is blame me for asking the question....yet none of you have an answer.

And you are OK with it.

Hmmmm....think about it......she had her own server, deleted emails without a third party present....has no explanation for her own server....lied about it and got caught......and as opposed to asking questions, you will simply vote for her.

The epitome of an uninformed voter.

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

her emails as SoS ARE public by law. How can you criticize me when you aren't aware that she deleted emails and her emails are public by law?

Careful

She worked for the State Department. If some of the emails is considered a national security risk if made public(which is what some conservatives have unknowingly claimed) then the public records act is blocked.

This also undermines the public need to know involving the reason she had a second server. Just asking that question could be considered a security risk.

That is, unless, the private server never contained such high leveled information.

 

[amrchaos]

I just thought of something

If the investigators read the email from the private server, they already know why she set it up. The reason follows from the general topics of the emails.truth, it cou

Asking her maybe a political trap.

If she tells the truth, it could diminish her chances in the election.

If she lies she could be charged with a crime.

However, you don't need to ask her at all to find out the truth yourself. Just read her emails! Which they have!

they do not have all of the emails. She admittedly deleted 40% of them claiming them to be personal.

You can still surmise the general purpose of the server from the remaining 60% plus the remaining 40% can be recovered.

in other words, you are asking a question the investigators already know the answers to.

look...

She was SoS for 4 years....MOST of her emails were legit SoS business....no doubt.
But she admitted to have wiped the server clean and gave the state department about 60% of them...claiming the other 40% were personal.
When asked for the server, she said it was blank...wiped clean.....and she said (paraphrased)....'trust me. I only deleted my personal emails'
SO now the FBI has the server.....but once it is wiped clean, it is nearly impossible to recover. However, they are seeking back up copies from the companies that oversaw and maintained her server.

They are doing what they can.

But it begs the question....why did she do it to begin with?

As I said before, they can surmise the general answer from the 60%

When they recover the other 40%(which they can) they will have everything plus more than necessary to file what ever charges they want against her.

Considering how disturbing this was at the beginning, I asked why they haven't filed charges for breaking protocol? It is not double jeopardy to file two different set of charges over a period of time. So why not file charges now for what you know.

Then file charges for the things you find out later?

Why drag this out?

 

[ClosedCaption]

I just thought of something

If the investigators read the email from the private server, they already know why she set it up. The reason follows from the general topics of the emails.truth, it cou

Asking her maybe a political trap.

If she tells the truth, it could diminish her chances in the election.

If she lies she could be charged with a crime.

However, you don't need to ask her at all to find out the truth yourself. Just read her emails! Which they have!

they do not have all of the emails. She admittedly deleted 40% of them claiming them to be personal.

You can still surmise the general purpose of the server from the remaining 60% plus the remaining 40% can be recovered.

in other words, you are asking a question the investigators already know the answers to.

look...

She was SoS for 4 years....MOST of her emails were legit SoS business....no doubt.
But she admitted to have wiped the server clean and gave the state department about 60% of them...claiming the other 40% were personal.
When asked for the server, she said it was blank...wiped clean.....and she said (paraphrased)....'trust me. I only deleted my personal emails'
SO now the FBI has the server.....but once it is wiped clean, it is nearly impossible to recover. However, they are seeking back up copies from the companies that oversaw and maintained her server.

They are doing what they can.

But it begs the question....why did she do it to begin with?

Because she learned from her husband all about Republican Fishing Expeditions

 

[Jarhead]

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

They think it's stupid because it questions one of their own.

No

We think it is stupid because it is an obvious attempt to make her emails public, and the realization that the investigators know the purpose of the private server due to the emails from it.

Why do you need to know why she set up a private server. The investigators can figure that out without asking her. How else did they prove she 'lied'?

her emails as SoS ARE public by law. How can you criticize me when you aren't aware that she deleted emails and her emails are public by law?

Careful

She worked for the State Department. If some of the emails is considered a national security risk if made public(which is what some conservatives have unknowingly claimed) then the public records act is blocked.

This also undermines the public need to know involving the reason she had a second server. Just asking that question could be considered a security risk.

That is, unless, the private server never contained such high leveled information.

I did not realize you were so naïve.
My mistake for wasting my time with you.
But just an FYI....
Public record does not mean "for the public to view at their leisure"
It means it is the property of the people of the United States and must be preserved and it is not the private possession of the government employee who wrote it or received it.

And you are debating this issue? You don't even know the basics.

 

[Jarhead]

I just thought of something

If the investigators read the email from the private server, they already know why she set it up. The reason follows from the general topics of the emails.truth, it cou

Asking her maybe a political trap.

If she tells the truth, it could diminish her chances in the election.

If she lies she could be charged with a crime.

However, you don't need to ask her at all to find out the truth yourself. Just read her emails! Which they have!

they do not have all of the emails. She admittedly deleted 40% of them claiming them to be personal.

You can still surmise the general purpose of the server from the remaining 60% plus the remaining 40% can be recovered.

in other words, you are asking a question the investigators already know the answers to.

look...

She was SoS for 4 years....MOST of her emails were legit SoS business....no doubt.
But she admitted to have wiped the server clean and gave the state department about 60% of them...claiming the other 40% were personal.
When asked for the server, she said it was blank...wiped clean.....and she said (paraphrased)....'trust me. I only deleted my personal emails'
SO now the FBI has the server.....but once it is wiped clean, it is nearly impossible to recover. However, they are seeking back up copies from the companies that oversaw and maintained her server.

They are doing what they can.

But it begs the question....why did she do it to begin with?

As I said before, they can surmise the general answer from the 60%

When they recover the other 40%(which they can) they will have everything plus more than necessary to file what ever charges they want against her.

Considering how disturbing this was at the beginning, I asked why they haven't filed charges for breaking protocol? It is not double jeopardy to file two different set of charges over a period of time. So why not file charges now for what you know.

Then file charges for the things you find out later?

Why drag this out?

breaking protocol is not a crime. It is reason for being reprimanded, yes, but not a crime. FBI looks for crimes committed...not the breaking of protocol

What they are looking for now is to see if she deleted emails that contained any information she received or sent that had information she attained BECUASE she was a government employee.

That would be a breach of the public records act....a crime.

You are not well versed in this topic to debate it

 

[g5000]

Doesn't matter. You already believe so much crazy crap about Democrats till one more silly accusation won't hurt.

See?

All you guys keep doing is blame me for asking the question....yet none of you have an answer.

And you are OK with it.

Hmmmm....think about it......she had her own server, deleted emails without a third party present....has no explanation for her own server....lied about it and got caught......and as opposed to asking questions, you will simply vote for her.

The epitome of an uninformed voter.

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

I showed you mine, now show me yours. Let's hear your stupid theory. Put it out there, hack.

My theory is quite simple.

All government emails are governed by the records act. When a government employee leaves office, the emails are preserved by archives and referred to when necessary...for historical purposes or investigative purposes. When such employee leaves office, he/she may delete emails off his/her computer, but they are preserved on the .gov server.

She did not want many of her emails to become public record.

Quite simple.

Now...the question is .....why?

Exactly what I said. She did not need her personal emails to be fodder for Rush Limbaugh to spend three hours talking about the political implications of her choice of maxi pads.

Snowden showed just how vulnerable diplomatic cables are. Diplomatic cables are on State Department servers. Snowden exposed how any jackass in the government could access any government emails they wished.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

All you need to know about democrats and their brainwashed followers is that repub debates will air on Fox News and all major networks. Democrat debates will air on all networks except Fox News.

 

[Jarhead]

See?

All you guys keep doing is blame me for asking the question....yet none of you have an answer.

And you are OK with it.

Hmmmm....think about it......she had her own server, deleted emails without a third party present....has no explanation for her own server....lied about it and got caught......and as opposed to asking questions, you will simply vote for her.

The epitome of an uninformed voter.

Nobody is blaming you for asking a question. We are laughing at you for asking that question.......and lots of other stupid questions.

yet you still don't have an answer.

Why is it a stupid question to ask the SoS why she set up a private server? ANd if it is a stupid question, why did she lie 3 different times when asked?

I showed you mine, now show me yours. Let's hear your stupid theory. Put it out there, hack.

My theory is quite simple.

All government emails are governed by the records act. When a government employee leaves office, the emails are preserved by archives and referred to when necessary...for historical purposes or investigative purposes. When such employee leaves office, he/she may delete emails off his/her computer, but they are preserved on the .gov server.

She did not want many of her emails to become public record.

Quite simple.

Now...the question is .....why?

Exactly what I said. She did not need her personal emails to be fodder for Rush Limbaugh to spend three hours talking about the political implications of her choice of maxi pads.

I understand. But if she wanted to keep her private emails private, she should have used her private email server for her private emails.....which she did

My question is why did she use a private email server for her government business. Why did she create a situation where she could delete government emails if she opted to? You do realize that what she did opened the door for her not adhering to the public records act if she so desired.

And again, that's fine if there was a good reason for it......but she wont give one.

and you are OK with it.

Which speaks volumes.

 

[bendog]

Remember the first Republican debate? Why were these questions not asked at the Democratic Debate?

1. Hillary's lies about her secret email server. Instead, her claim that she has been "transparent" was left unchallenged. Compare this to the attack on Trump for not promising to support the other GOP candidates.

2. Late term abortions. GOP candidates were grilled over saving the life of the mother. Why weren't the Dems asked to specify their positions on late term abortions and harvesting baby parts?

3. Religion. GOP candidates were asked about their religious beliefs and how that might affect their decisions. Why weren't the Dems asked the same question?

I agree with Hillary that there is a vast conspiracy in this country to hoodwink the American public. However, it is not coming from the Right.

O'Malley's a Papist, Webb's a Baptist, Bernie's a Jew, though non-observant and married to a Papist, which probably makes him a self-loathing Jew to the Zionists, and Hillary's adept in black magic. Nothing new here.