I'm surprised you don't want to know. If one of them is responsible, and it comes out after he or she wins the nomination, it will be very politically damaging.So you want them to go on the record on something not important rather than discussion leadership in our nation which is?
If one of them responsible, why would it be politically damaging that they exposed an alleged scandal of another candidate?
If Obama did it, would it be politically damaging?
I seem to recall that Clinton was elected twice despite the bimbo eruptions that were established as fact. The fact is, most of his constituency didn't care.
I honestly don't know how the media and others who are doing their damndest to destroy Herman Cain and his family sleep nights. CNN has practically made it a 24 hour vendetta. He was accused. His accuser refused to be identified. There is no proof. He has denied it. So it should be dropped until somebody has some concrete proof.
To intentionally and maliciously destroy a man's reputation, put his family into the limelight, and attack him repeatedly, mercilessly, and without any sense of compassion should be repugnant to every person of integrity.
And to schluck up a national debate with that kind of nonsense should inspire every voter in the country to denounce that by voting for that candidate.