Questions For Evolutionists.

[ActionJackson]

Two simple questions for Religious Evolutionists:

1) How did the earliest organisms reproduce before they evolved sexual organs?

2) If the earliest organisms were able to reproduce without sexual organs, then why was there a need for them (sexual organs) to evolve in the first place?

The very first chapter of the Bible openly discusses the two sexes matter-of-factly. It not only discusses that two sexes existed from the beginning but discusses the purpose of sexual relations between a man (he) and a woman (she).

 

[rightwinger]

Simple organisms don’t have sexes

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Two simple questions for Religious Evolutionists:

1) How did the earliest organisms reproduce before they evolved sexual organs?

2) If the earliest organisms were able to reproduce without sexual organs, then why was there a need for them (sexual organs) to evolve in the first place?

The very first chapter of the Bible openly discusses the two sexes matter-of-factly. It not only discusses that two sexes existed from the beginning but discusses the purpose of sexual relations between a man (he) and a woman (she).

How did the earliest organisms reproduce before they evolved sexual organs?

Fission.

If the earliest organisms were able to reproduce without sexual organs, then why was there a need for them (sexual organs) to evolve in the first place?

Genetic diversity.

 

[ActionJackson]

How did the earliest organisms reproduce before they evolved sexual organs?

Fission.

If the earliest organisms were able to reproduce without sexual organs, then why was there a need for them (sexual organs) to evolve in the first place?

Genetic diversity.

How many of today's species reproduce via "fission?" Which version of reproduction (fission vs. sexual intercourse) is the most efficient way to reproduce?

 

[rampart]

the first organisms were barely more than chemical strands, reproducing much as dna still splits.

the single celled organisms that came next divided into clones, just as amebae and millions of other bacteria and things do today.

the advantages of sexual reproduction: more variance with possibility of increased adaptation and mutation, over millions of years are still at the experimental stage. humans may need to use in vitro fertilization in the future.

 

[Donald H]

Two simple questions for Religious Evolutionists:

1) How did the earliest organisms reproduce before they evolved sexual organs?

First learn about how some lifeforms reproduce without sex or sex organs. l

Report back with that understanding and then you'll be qualified to take part in a discussion, and ask more questions.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How many of today's species reproduce via "fission?" Which version of reproduction (fission vs. sexual intercourse) is the most efficient way to reproduce?

How many of today's species reproduce via "fission?"

I think the technical answer is a bunch.

Fission (biology) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Which version of reproduction (fission vs. sexual intercourse) is the most efficient way to reproduce?

Fission is much faster.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Evolution is simply impossible....it's like saying the code for running the USMB Board was just a series of random accidents and that is FAR LESS complicated than even a virus.

 

[ActionJackson]

the first organisms were barely more than chemical strands, reproducing much as dna still splits.

the single celled organisms that came next divided into clones, just as amebae and millions of other bacteria and things do today.

the advantages of sexual reproduction: more variance with possibility of increased adaptation and mutation, over millions of years are still at the experimental stage. humans may need to use in vitro fertilization in the future.

Which is more efficient, though? For an organism to simply divide itself seems to me to be the ultimate goal of evolution. No need to find a mate. Simply reproduce as necessary. As the old saying goes: "if it works ... don't fix it."

 

[ActionJackson]

First learn about how some lifeforms reproduce without sex or sex organs. l

Report back with that understanding and then you'll be qualified to take part in a discussion, and ask more questions.

So you don't really have any answers. That's all you had to say. I understand.

 

[ActionJackson]

How many of today's species reproduce via "fission?"

I think the technical answer is a bunch.

Fission (biology) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Which version of reproduction (fission vs. sexual intercourse) is the most efficient way to reproduce?

Fission is much faster.

Faster and more efficient?

 

[Donald H]

the first organisms were barely more than chemical strands, reproducing much as dna still splits.

the single celled organisms that came next divided into clones, just as amebae and millions of other bacteria and things do today.

the advantages of sexual reproduction: more variance with possibility of increased adaptation and mutation, over millions of years are still at the experimental stage. humans may need to use in vitro fertilization in the future.

There's an easier answer for Christian lowbrows. The god created everything 6000 years ago.

 

[rampart]

How many of today's species reproduce via "fission?" Which version of reproduction (fission vs. sexual intercourse) is the most efficient way to reproduce?

millions of species still reproduce by "fission" or mitosis. it seems to work as observed in any decent microscope.

is this a version of the "why are there still monkeys question? that would show that your home schooling was a fail.

 

[ActionJackson]

There's an easier answer for Christian lowbrows. The god created everything 6000 years ago.

Again ... no legitimate answers to the simple questions.

 

[Donald H]

So you don't really have any answers. That's all you had to say. I understand.

The god created everything 6000 years ago.

 

[ActionJackson]

The god created everything 6000 years ago.

"God" is capitalized, and it was a bit longer than 6000 years ago. Otherwise, I agree with you.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Faster and more efficient?

Define efficient.

 

[TNHarley]

How did the earliest organisms reproduce before they evolved sexual organs?

Like ferns do. Send out "runners" and clone them.

If the earliest organisms were able to reproduce without sexual organs, then why was there a need for them (sexual organs) to evolve in the first place?

Genetic diversity. Its a benefit.

 

[rampart]

Which is more efficient, though? For an organism to simply divide itself seems to me to be the ultimate goal of evolution. No need to find a mate. Simply reproduce as necessary. As the old saying goes: "if it works ... don't fix it."

it works only for single cells, to include the cells of a more complex organism. can you imagine the division of a cat? i'm not sure either 1/2 of even schroedinger's would survive.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

it works only for single cells, to include the cells of a more complex organism. can you imagine the division of a cat? i'm not sure either 1/2 of even schroedinger's would survive.