Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
/——-/ I read history, that’s how I know.Please quote the USSC ruling that uses the word "artificial."/——/ Let me enlighten you, the US supreme Court has ruled "corporations are ARTIFICIAL people!"Let me enlighten you the US supreme Court has ruled "corporations ARE people!"Let's enlighten you on something. Corporations are actually run by CEO's and members of the boards. Those corporate leaders PAY TAXES, just a we do. The "Company or Corporation" is a name and a building(s). These corporations employers pay for the building, property taxes (expensive), the permits, the furniture and supplies, utilities, et cetera. The employee isn't responsible for anything except to show up on time, do his or her assigned task and then GO HOME. That's it.Corporations pay only 6% of total federal taxes, so let them use only 6% of federal highways and ports to get their goods to market first!The business of America, is business. If the idea of a company making a profit disturbs you, simply gather all the leftists in the country together and stop buying products. Make your own shirts, pants, shoes, jackets and underwear. Grow your own foods. Get around via a horse, until companies start selling horses and making a profit, then walk. You're using a computer purchased from a company that gets profit through your purchases. Get rid of it. If you want to talk to people, attach a string to two cans and speak through them. If enough of you stop buying products, companies will dwindle.
If you want the products and aren't going to make them yourselves, but don't like companies making a profit, tax them to the max....BUT, remember when you do this, they lose ALL incentive to continue in that business and it stifles creative advancements, hence your Communist governments are always trying to steal western technology and adapt it to their own needs.
Going to bed, it's late.
Or admit you just made up that crap.
Again, you just made up that crap!They are the same thing......government control of the means of production. Fascism is socialism.
/——-/ CON$ervoFascist is just something you made up while DemocRATic is a label you claim is accurate. You big dope.You can't spell CON$ervoFascist with out a CON!/——/ You can’t spell DemocratIC without RAT.DemocratIC socialists.Answer honestly
I will give you credit for using an ellipsis to deceptively edit out the fact that What Rehnquist said was NOT what the USSC RULED, but was HIS dissent./——-/ I read history, that’s how I know.Please quote the USSC ruling that uses the word "artificial."/——/ Let me enlighten you, the US supreme Court has ruled "corporations are ARTIFICIAL people!"Let me enlighten you the US supreme Court has ruled "corporations ARE people!"Let's enlighten you on something. Corporations are actually run by CEO's and members of the boards. Those corporate leaders PAY TAXES, just a we do. The "Company or Corporation" is a name and a building(s). These corporations employers pay for the building, property taxes (expensive), the permits, the furniture and supplies, utilities, et cetera. The employee isn't responsible for anything except to show up on time, do his or her assigned task and then GO HOME. That's it.Corporations pay only 6% of total federal taxes, so let them use only 6% of federal highways and ports to get their goods to market first!
Going to bed, it's late.
Or admit you just made up that crap.
How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People ...
https://www.history.com/news/14th-amendment-corporate-personhood-made-corporations-into-people
How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People' ... Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote that corporations were "artificial" persons rather than "natural" persons, and that granting ...
Without this designation, you couldn’t tax, regulate or sue a corporation, you glittering jewel of colossal ignorance.
Meaning there is no record of it actually happening, IOW it is nade up!Hitler repeatedly praised Marx privately
Now you are giving "personhood" to sheep, that says more about who YOU want to marry!!!!!You are intolerant bigot! What should you do, if the "person of your choice" is a sheep?Notice how the Fascist Right has to change the subject when they know they are LOSING!Are you ready to marry a dead body, a little girl, or a sheep? I suppose it doesn't conform your religion, too.And there it is! So much for the CON$ervoFascist LIE about LIBERTY. To the Right you are NEVER at LIBERTY to marry the person of your choice if if doesn't CONFORM to their FAKE religion!!!You would force a court worker to perform a wedding for something they DON'T AGREE WITH.......Which is EXACTLY WHY some STATES REFUSE TO DO THE CERIMONY ANYMORE................To avoid FORCING OTHERS to do something against their religion.............I'm talking about you personally. I'm saying that the right has pushed for things that would fly in the face of personal liberty.
Anyway, glad to hear that you think all Americans have the right to marry someone of the same sex. It's nice to know that even some on the right endorse freedom.
We DON'T HAVE TO AGREE WITH YOUR LIFESTYLE BRO...........and WE DON'T.......Forced Acceptance doesn't work on us Lib.............we WILL NOT ACCEPT IT........and we are under No Obligation to do so.
Pure "Right to Life" BULLSHIT!/——/"Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women's movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist Women's movement has in reality but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creation which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle"
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech to the NS Frauenschaft (Sept. 8, 1934)
Gee you CON$ervoFascist sound just like Nazis with your anti-choice crap!!!!
THE TRUTH
The Nazis certainly were not "pro-Choice", but they were not "anti-abortion" either. The Nazis believed that a woman's body belonged to the State, and the State would decide what to do with it. The Nazis did not allow abortion for healthy "Aryan" German women, but demanded and forced abortion upon women deemed "unAryan" (i.e. Jews, Gypsies, Slavs, etc.) and "Aryan" German women who were thought to be feeble-minded, or have hereditary diseases. (Abortion in the New Europe, p.114) https://www.cpforlife.org/the-nazis-and-abortion
/—-/ Yet, you cant prove my source wrong.Pure "Right to Life" BULLSHIT!/——/"Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women's movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist Women's movement has in reality but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creation which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle"
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech to the NS Frauenschaft (Sept. 8, 1934)
Gee you CON$ervoFascist sound just like Nazis with your anti-choice crap!!!!
THE TRUTH
The Nazis certainly were not "pro-Choice", but they were not "anti-abortion" either. The Nazis believed that a woman's body belonged to the State, and the State would decide what to do with it. The Nazis did not allow abortion for healthy "Aryan" German women, but demanded and forced abortion upon women deemed "unAryan" (i.e. Jews, Gypsies, Slavs, etc.) and "Aryan" German women who were thought to be feeble-minded, or have hereditary diseases. (Abortion in the New Europe, p.114) https://www.cpforlife.org/the-nazis-and-abortion
/—-/ I didn’t edit anything. You accused me of making up the term artificial person to describe corporations and I provided one of many sources. Take that designation away and you can’t tax, regulate or sue a corporation any more than you could an inanimate object.I will give you credit for using an ellipsis to deceptively edit out the fact that What Rehnquist said was NOT what the USSC RULED, but was HIS dissent./——-/ I read history, that’s how I know.Please quote the USSC ruling that uses the word "artificial."/——/ Let me enlighten you, the US supreme Court has ruled "corporations are ARTIFICIAL people!"Let me enlighten you the US supreme Court has ruled "corporations ARE people!"Let's enlighten you on something. Corporations are actually run by CEO's and members of the boards. Those corporate leaders PAY TAXES, just a we do. The "Company or Corporation" is a name and a building(s). These corporations employers pay for the building, property taxes (expensive), the permits, the furniture and supplies, utilities, et cetera. The employee isn't responsible for anything except to show up on time, do his or her assigned task and then GO HOME. That's it.
Going to bed, it's late.
Or admit you just made up that crap.
How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People ...
How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People' ... Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote that corporations were "artificial" persons rather than "natural" persons, and that granting ...
Without this designation, you couldn’t tax, regulate or sue a corporation, you glittering jewel of colossal ignorance.
Your own link unedited:
The legacy of the 14th amendment.
Not everyone agrees with this expanding interpretation of corporate personhood. In his dissent in Bellotti, Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote that corporations were “artificial” persons rather than “natural” persons, and that granting them the right to political expression could “pose special dangers in the political sphere.”
You should know by now I check EVERYTHING you professional liars post, you glittering jewel of colossal DittoTard ignorance.
If you can define homosexual "cohabitation" or "partnership" as kind of "marriage", why NPZR-activists can not call a dead body or an animal as a "person"?Now you are giving "personhood" to sheep, that says more about who YOU want to marry!!!!!You are intolerant bigot! What should you do, if the "person of your choice" is a sheep?Notice how the Fascist Right has to change the subject when they know they are LOSING!Are you ready to marry a dead body, a little girl, or a sheep? I suppose it doesn't conform your religion, too.And there it is! So much for the CON$ervoFascist LIE about LIBERTY. To the Right you are NEVER at LIBERTY to marry the person of your choice if if doesn't CONFORM to their FAKE religion!!!You would force a court worker to perform a wedding for something they DON'T AGREE WITH.......Which is EXACTLY WHY some STATES REFUSE TO DO THE CERIMONY ANYMORE................To avoid FORCING OTHERS to do something against their religion.............
We DON'T HAVE TO AGREE WITH YOUR LIFESTYLE BRO...........and WE DON'T.......Forced Acceptance doesn't work on us Lib.............we WILL NOT ACCEPT IT........and we are under No Obligation to do so.
If you support the "pre-birth abortion" right, do you support the "post-birth abortion" right, too? Or are you just a hypocritical bigot?Pure "Right to Life" BULLSHIT!/——/"Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women's movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist Women's movement has in reality but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creation which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle"
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech to the NS Frauenschaft (Sept. 8, 1934)
Gee you CON$ervoFascist sound just like Nazis with your anti-choice crap!!!!
THE TRUTH
The Nazis certainly were not "pro-Choice", but they were not "anti-abortion" either. The Nazis believed that a woman's body belonged to the State, and the State would decide what to do with it. The Nazis did not allow abortion for healthy "Aryan" German women, but demanded and forced abortion upon women deemed "unAryan" (i.e. Jews, Gypsies, Slavs, etc.) and "Aryan" German women who were thought to be feeble-minded, or have hereditary diseases. (Abortion in the New Europe, p.114) https://www.cpforlife.org/the-nazis-and-abortion
In your case I might!If you support the "pre-birth abortion" right, do you support the "post-birth abortion" right, too? Or are you just a hypocritical bigot?Pure "Right to Life" BULLSHIT!/——/"Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women's movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist Women's movement has in reality but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creation which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle"
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech to the NS Frauenschaft (Sept. 8, 1934)
Gee you CON$ervoFascist sound just like Nazis with your anti-choice crap!!!!
THE TRUTH
The Nazis certainly were not "pro-Choice", but they were not "anti-abortion" either. The Nazis believed that a woman's body belonged to the State, and the State would decide what to do with it. The Nazis did not allow abortion for healthy "Aryan" German women, but demanded and forced abortion upon women deemed "unAryan" (i.e. Jews, Gypsies, Slavs, etc.) and "Aryan" German women who were thought to be feeble-minded, or have hereditary diseases. (Abortion in the New Europe, p.114) https://www.cpforlife.org/the-nazis-and-abortion
They don't know the difference.DemocratIC socialists.
Your "source" is a pro-life OPINION piece with no basis in fact./—-/ Yet, you cant prove my source wrong.Pure "Right to Life" BULLSHIT!/——/"Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women's movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist Women's movement has in reality but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creation which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle"
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech to the NS Frauenschaft (Sept. 8, 1934)
Gee you CON$ervoFascist sound just like Nazis with your anti-choice crap!!!!
THE TRUTH
The Nazis certainly were not "pro-Choice", but they were not "anti-abortion" either. The Nazis believed that a woman's body belonged to the State, and the State would decide what to do with it. The Nazis did not allow abortion for healthy "Aryan" German women, but demanded and forced abortion upon women deemed "unAryan" (i.e. Jews, Gypsies, Slavs, etc.) and "Aryan" German women who were thought to be feeble-minded, or have hereditary diseases. (Abortion in the New Europe, p.114) https://www.cpforlife.org/the-nazis-and-abortion
No, now you are just lying! YOU claimed the USSC RULED that corporations are "artificial" persons and I called you out on that LIE! You then edited a DISSENTING opinion by Rehnquist to look like a USSC ruling, and I caught you on that LIE also!!!!!/—-/ I didn’t edit anything. You accused me of making up the term artificial person to describe corporations and I provided one of many sources. Take that designation away and you can’t tax, regulate or sue a corporation any more than you could an inanimate object.I will give you credit for using an ellipsis to deceptively edit out the fact that What Rehnquist said was NOT what the USSC RULED, but was HIS dissent./——-/ I read history, that’s how I know.Please quote the USSC ruling that uses the word "artificial."/——/ Let me enlighten you, the US supreme Court has ruled "corporations are ARTIFICIAL people!"Let me enlighten you the US supreme Court has ruled "corporations ARE people!"
Or admit you just made up that crap.
How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People ...
How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People' ... Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote that corporations were "artificial" persons rather than "natural" persons, and that granting ...
Without this designation, you couldn’t tax, regulate or sue a corporation, you glittering jewel of colossal ignorance.
Your own link unedited:
The legacy of the 14th amendment.
Not everyone agrees with this expanding interpretation of corporate personhood. In his dissent in Bellotti, Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote that corporations were “artificial” persons rather than “natural” persons, and that granting them the right to political expression could “pose special dangers in the political sphere.”
You should know by now I check EVERYTHING you professional liars post, you glittering jewel of colossal DittoTard ignorance.
Let me enlighten you, the US supreme Court has ruled "corporations are ARTIFICIAL people!"
/—-/ I didn’t edit anything in the article. I merely corrected your statement “the US supreme Court has ruled"corporations are people!"No, now you are just lying! YOU claimed the USSC RULED that corporations are "artificial" persons and I called you out on that LIE! You then edited a DISSENTING opinion by Rehnquist to look like a USSC ruling, and I caught you on that LIE also!!!!!/—-/ I didn’t edit anything. You accused me of making up the term artificial person to describe corporations and I provided one of many sources. Take that designation away and you can’t tax, regulate or sue a corporation any more than you could an inanimate object.I will give you credit for using an ellipsis to deceptively edit out the fact that What Rehnquist said was NOT what the USSC RULED, but was HIS dissent./——-/ I read history, that’s how I know.Please quote the USSC ruling that uses the word "artificial."/——/ Let me enlighten you, the US supreme Court has ruled "corporations are ARTIFICIAL people!"
Or admit you just made up that crap.
How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People ...
How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People' ... Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote that corporations were "artificial" persons rather than "natural" persons, and that granting ...
Without this designation, you couldn’t tax, regulate or sue a corporation, you glittering jewel of colossal ignorance.
Your own link unedited:
The legacy of the 14th amendment.
Not everyone agrees with this expanding interpretation of corporate personhood. In his dissent in Bellotti, Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote that corporations were “artificial” persons rather than “natural” persons, and that granting them the right to political expression could “pose special dangers in the political sphere.”
You should know by now I check EVERYTHING you professional liars post, you glittering jewel of colossal DittoTard ignorance.
You glittering jewel of colossal DittoTard ignorance.
Let me refresh your memory:
Let me enlighten you, the US supreme Court has ruled "corporations are ARTIFICIAL people!"
/—-/ And that’s your opinion. Bwhahahaha BwhahahahaYour "source" is a pro-life OPINION piece with no basis in fact./—-/ Yet, you cant prove my source wrong.Pure "Right to Life" BULLSHIT!/——/"Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women's movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist Women's movement has in reality but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creation which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle"
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech to the NS Frauenschaft (Sept. 8, 1934)
Gee you CON$ervoFascist sound just like Nazis with your anti-choice crap!!!!
THE TRUTH
The Nazis certainly were not "pro-Choice", but they were not "anti-abortion" either. The Nazis believed that a woman's body belonged to the State, and the State would decide what to do with it. The Nazis did not allow abortion for healthy "Aryan" German women, but demanded and forced abortion upon women deemed "unAryan" (i.e. Jews, Gypsies, Slavs, etc.) and "Aryan" German women who were thought to be feeble-minded, or have hereditary diseases. (Abortion in the New Europe, p.114) https://www.cpforlife.org/the-nazis-and-abortion
Once again you people need to look up the definition of socialism
If I wanted to live in Norway I'd move there
I don't think Norway has a shortage of any of those things. Trump's best buddy's country however is another matter.
