PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
So.. You're fine with two men, or two women adopting a child? After all, it's two parents, and two parents are ALWAYS better than one, right?
Or do you not possess the balls to further state that only heterosexual married couples may adopt a child, in your small little world?
What do you recommend happen to all of these children that are not being aborted, but are still being given up by their mothers? You think it far better for a child to spend the first 18 years of it's life with an adoption agency, prior to being turned out on its own, since for all intents and purposes, the state is finished with you once you become a legal adult?
Seriously.. You are one twisted puppy.
You know, I just realized that in this thread, there are a number of posts by a new member who writes well, and the import of whose posts is very similar to the import of my posts: he also doesnt feel that a single mother would make an appropriate home for a perspective infant.
And guess what? Neither of you felt it necessary to attack his posts!!!
And I can guess why: your are servile, cowering biddies, who somehow feel it would be easier to denigrate a woman, but would not dare to try the same on a man!!!
You weak, subordinate sisters! This is so laughable! Since his points mirror mine in so many ways, you crones must make believe that you dont notice same. Cowards. Cowardly losers.
Id say you girls have an inferiority complex, except its not a complex.
You whimps are an insult the distaff side. Ooopss, I forgot your trouble with language. Distaff means womem.
WTF are you talking about, you severely deluded windbag? I don't know "him" from Adam, I haven't been here all day, because unlike you, some of us have things to do, and this isn't a discussion I've been having with "him" - it's one I've been having with YOU. Therefore, I have no reason to jump all over someone just because YOU think I should. For the record, there are two of you, now. You should be very proud. One whole person agrees with you - throw a friggen party. (Where's that little noisemaker icon when you need it)
So very good (and typical!) of you to avoid my very specific questions, however.
Why, DISproportionate, what a thin response: "I haven't been here all day..."
And yet you inadvertently admit that you read the thread in its entirety: " One whole person agrees with you..."
What a fraud you are, a cowardly fraud.
Since you are unencumbered by the thought process, let me explain: it's not the numbers that count, for I held my own and then some against you and the rest of the witches, it's the points that I made, and the 'Rat' made that destroy your silly invective-laden buffoonery.
Where are your curses, accusations, lies and attacks on our new member?
Could it be that I've exposed another weakness in your character: afraid to confront this new member because he is a man?
How can you explain it? The points that I made are there in his posts!
My logic destroyed your "It's all about me" argument in the great 330+ thread, and now the same argument is posted by our new member.
And now you wish to ask some new question? Why?
Oh, I see, because you have been beaten so thoroughly, you must try to change the subject.
Here it is again, read it and weep:
"To be a mother, you and another adult, committed partner (i.e. spouse) have the interest, intent, ability, and means to make the necessary sacrifices of time, attention, and resources to give the child the nurturing, security, support, love and education he or she needs!
Procreation has little to do with your needs; it has everything to do with the child's needs."