Puncturing Another Progressive Myth

Discussion in 'Economy' started by PoliticalChic, Apr 18, 2014.

  1. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    36,822
    Thanks Received:
    9,784
    Trophy Points:
    462
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +10,717
    I get such a kick out of Donald J. Boudreaux, professor of economics at George Mason University!

    He regularly writes a letter to the editor of a major American publication in response to an absurdity, or an incorrect statement, offered up by a columnist or politician, and the following, totally skewers one of our Liberal White House hacks.




    Here is one of Boudreaux's missives:

    Editor, Washington Post
    1150 15th St., NW
    Washington, DC 20071

    Dear Editor:

    You report that Jason Furman, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, recently “displayed a chart showing how food stamps and other social programs had lowered poverty dramatically over the past half century.... But the graph also showed that the economy itself had done nothing for the poor: Only government dollars had” (“Economist Jason Furman is the wonkiest wonk in the White House,” Feb. 13).



    .... Mr. Furman is mistaken to assert that, over the past half century, “the economy itself had done nothing for the poor.”

    Here’s a link to a 2008 article with its own charts.... shows that the percentage of poor American households in 2005 to have refrigerators, stoves, color televisions, air conditioning, and automatic dishwashers is higher than was the percentage of all American households in 1971 to have these amenities. And my own research suggests an important reason for this happy fact: the amount of time that ordinary (“non-supervisory”) workers must work in order to earn enough income to buy these (and many other) products is today is much lower than it was decades ago.

    [link here: http://www.american.com/archive/2008/july-august-magazine-contents/how-are-we-doing/]




    For example, to buy a 22 cubic feet refrigerator-freezer, such a worker in 1975 had to toil for 140 hours. To buy the same size refrigerator-freezer today, the typical American worker must work only 52 hours. To buy a 30” electric range and oven cost the typical American worker in 1975 125 hours of work; today such a range and oven costs the typical American worker only 21 hours of work.



    Similar reductions in work-time costs have occurred for food, clothing, and countless other goods and services — a trend that is strong evidence that “the economy itself” continues to improve the living standards of middle-income and poor Americans.

    Sincerely,
    Donald J. Boudreaux
    Professor of Economics
    and
    Martha and Nelson Getchell Chair for the Study of Free Market Capitalism at the Mercatus Center
    George Mason University
    Fairfax, VA 22030
    Nothing? Nothing At All?






    "....strong evidence that “the economy itself” continues to improve the living standards of middle-income and poor Americans."


    So much for the 'poor are getting poorer' trope.

    I know that the above won't convince our Liberal pals......facts never do.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. Spoonman
    Offline

    Spoonman Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2010
    Messages:
    17,998
    Thanks Received:
    5,467
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Ratings:
    +5,570
    so now according to liberals , all these people on entitlements are no longer considered poor? this is what they call a success story?
     
  3. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    36,822
    Thanks Received:
    9,784
    Trophy Points:
    462
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +10,717


    As you know, the 'poverty' definition is a fabricated and wholly owned copyright of Leftist pols, useful as long as simpleminded voters buy it like it was on sale.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. Iceweasel
    Offline

    Iceweasel Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2013
    Messages:
    5,689
    Thanks Received:
    783
    Trophy Points:
    170
    Location:
    Washington State
    Ratings:
    +1,537
    Accuracy is not the goal of the progressive. Bigger government is, no matter what. Any faults will be blamed on something else because the bigger the government is the better things are supposed to be.
     
  5. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,591
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,594
    The economy itself helps the poor if it is targeted at the poor.

    The economy can grow healthier while the poor grow poorer.

    As some of us are just now realizing.
     
  6. HereWeGoAgain
    Online

    HereWeGoAgain Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    8,744
    Thanks Received:
    969
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,592
    Sounds like they need to get a job.
     
  7. Howey
    Online

    Howey Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    3,946
    Thanks Received:
    515
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Ratings:
    +534

    How very libertarian of him!

    HOW DARE THOSE POOR PEOPLE ENJOY A BETTER LIFER THAN THEY DID IN 1970! SHAME ON THEM!

    AND HOW DARE THEY HAVE FANCY NICETIES LIFER REFRIGERATORS AND STOVES!!!

    HOW DARE THEY!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. usmcstinger
    Offline

    usmcstinger VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2011
    Messages:
    933
    Thanks Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +166
    Obviously, you have no understanding of basic economics.
    No viable sources are listed. The stupid statement comes from your lack of intelligence
    and living in a delusional world.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. HereWeGoAgain
    Online

    HereWeGoAgain Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    8,744
    Thanks Received:
    969
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,592
    I know right! But why do they complain so much?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Impenitent
    Online

    Impenitent Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,208
    Thanks Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +334
    By clipping Mr. Furman's quote, Mr Boudreaux (and yourself) miss the point of Furman's statement, which is, that the economy has not produced enough JOBS for working class Americans.

    True, household appliances have gone down in net cost, yet that isn't an achievement of the American economy, but a by-product of production shift to impoverished, cheap labor pools over seas, and improvements in technologies.

    But this has been at a great expense to the American worker, who now finds himself under-employed, if employed at all.

    And I'm sure that the reductions in costs for the appliances have been eaten up by the increased energy costs of powering them.

    And you say nothing of the other costs of living! Man cannot live on bread toaster ovens alone! What about food, shelter, transportation, communication, and, of course, health care! All of these things combine to overwhelm the poor.

    We have a national political party that ignores the poor, (except when they vote!), and the only concern they seem to have, is how they can expediciously reduce their voting numbers.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2014

Share This Page