Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's different.
Compared to the last 30 years of other Presidents, Obama is more like a Republitard than a far left Democrat.
So, you're saying that he sucks?
AS I said countless times before, there is no difference between parties as far as the growth of government is concerned.
If you compare Clinton to the rest he was the rare exception.
Proof?
How do you claim to prove something that's commone knowledge?
The demands to shrink government and actually cut spending is a new [at the level] phenominon.
the goal is to increase revenue over spending.
Compared to the last 30 years of other Presidents, Obama is more like a Republitard than a far left Democrat.
So, you're saying that he sucks?
What I am saying is why are you bashing a President who acts more like the retards in your own party? He lowered taxes on corporate and personal income, the only difference is that during his short time the govt spent more on govt social benefits because of the recession and economic crisis, had he not done that things would be worst.
Proof?
How do you claim to prove something that's commone knowledge?
The demands to shrink government and actually cut spending is a new [at the level] phenominon.
the goal is to increase revenue over spending.
No... the goal is to decrease spending, so you don HAVE to increase revenue.
AS I said countless times before, there is no difference between parties as far as the growth of government is concerned.
If you compare Clinton to the rest he was the rare exception.
government did not decrease in size under slick willie
the goal is to increase revenue over spending.
No... the goal is to decrease spending, so you don HAVE to increase revenue.
NO!!!! Everything is solved by raising taxes, on someone else.
So, you're saying that he sucks?
What I am saying is why are you bashing a President who acts more like the retards in your own party? He lowered taxes on corporate and personal income, the only difference is that during his short time the govt spent more on govt social benefits because of the recession and economic crisis, had he not done that things would be worst.
Dude you're coming unhinged.. why the need for a question mark at the end of sentence 1, and, don't you mean worse, not worst?
No... the goal is to decrease spending, so you don HAVE to increase revenue.
NO!!!! Everything is solved by raising taxes, on someone else.
Show me one year according to that data where lower taxes reduced the deficit, if any anything the deficit increased with lowered taxes, thats true even under Obama who has not raised taxes despite rabid rightwing lies.
What I am saying is why are you bashing a President who acts more like the retards in your own party? He lowered taxes on corporate and personal income, the only difference is that during his short time the govt spent more on govt social benefits because of the recession and economic crisis, had he not done that things would be worst.
Dude you're coming unhinged.. why the need for a question mark at the end of sentence 1, and, don't you mean worse, not worst?
The data are right there for you to see, I need not engage in petty arguing, the fact is that the policies of the Republitards and their Teabagger deformed kids will not work, will further damage the country overall and only benefit the rich. GameOver.
If you compare Clinton to the rest he was the rare exception.
government did not decrease in size under slick willie
More government does cause deficits if sufficient revenue isn't more than what you spend, almost every Republitard president spending increased and less revenue was taken in, if you compare the stats over the last 30 years who has contributed more to increased govt, Repubs or Dems?
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis
Look at line 27 which will tell you whether the govt was running a deficit or surplus, if Republitards are party of less govt please explain why over the last 30 years every Republitard president has run a deficit every year they were in office? If trickle down and tax cuts for the rich are supposed to work find me one year under the Republitard president where generated revenue[receipts] has exceeded government spending[expenditures]? Why is it only in the Clinton years that were see a general reduction in deficit and surpluses?
Edit: In all fairness, the deficit under Bush did go down from 2004-2006 but more than quadrupled in his last three years and that since 2007 its been a downward spiral, proof that what Bush started Obama inherited.
Edit: In all fairness, the deficit under Bush did go down from 2004-2006 but more than quadrupled in his last three years and that since 2007 its been a downward spiral, proof that what Bush started Obama inherited.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis
Look at line 27 which will tell you whether the govt was running a deficit or surplus, if Republitards are party of less govt please explain why over the last 30 years every Republitard president has run a deficit every year they were in office? If trickle down and tax cuts for the rich are supposed to work find me one year under the Republitard president where generated revenue[receipts] has exceeded government spending[expenditures]? Why is it only in the Clinton years that were see a general reduction in deficit and surpluses? Why is it under Republitard presidents that deficits grew year after year?
Isn't Obama a democrat running up the deficit?
"During times of economic trouble, governments should borrow and spend to boost industrial activity, he suggested.
In most capitalist countries, governments took up this idea, but conveniently ignored Mr Keynes second piece of advice: they were supposed to pay back the debt, when the economy was nicely chugging along."
....to the Dems' attempt at one-MORE clean-up job!!
AS I said countless times before, there is no difference between parties as far as the growth of government is concerned.
Isn't Obama a democrat running up the deficit?Only if you consider paying-off DEBT.....WAY-past-due.....running up the deficit.
Not to worry. We Dems are USED-to cleaning-up after Republicans' over-spending.....but, our patience is running-OUT!!!!!
"During times of economic trouble, governments should borrow and spend to boost industrial activity, he suggested.
In most capitalist countries, governments took up this idea, but conveniently ignored Mr Keynes second piece of advice: they were supposed to pay back the debt, when the economy was nicely chugging along."
*
Now, we're lookin' at.....The Teabaggers' Answer
