Proof of the Dems' Election Steal

[AzogtheDefiler]

Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.

Clinton conceded the day after the election. There was no narrative that the election was stolen by criminal voter fraud. This is a false equivalency.

Clinton did and then went on talk shows and such and cried that she was robbed. Democrats for the next 4 years tried to undermine and even impeached Trump. Media was complicit. You don't know what "false equivalency" means. They announced Abrams as the Governor of GA at the the DNC, did they not? LOL

They name streets after you...ONE WAY.

Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified.

But she didn’t question the legitimacy of the outcome which is a massive difference.

Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified. - 100% Subjective but that is your right.

Stacey Abrams did.

Trump is going through a legal process. Why do you have an issue with that? The election has not been finalized.

His legal process is frivolous. Dozens of lawsuits tossed. His rhetoric is going far beyond what anyone should consider responsible.

What is not my opinion is that Clinton has a rational basis for her complaint. Russia did involve themselves in the campaign. The FBI did publicly reveal information against protocol.

Trump’s declarations of millions of his votes being stolen are not rational and his rhetoric is attacking an institution that we depend on. He is doing so without a rational basis and is deeply irresponsible.

And I disagree with you. The FISA was proven to be a sham. Trump may declare that aliens stole the vote. Courts and electors will ultimately send him home. Relax. And I believe he does have a rational basis. So let the legal battle begin. I don't necessarily believe the election was stolen but I do believe there were some inappropriate actions.

The scary part is that it was legitimate and so many zombies voted for one of their own.

Not sure what FISA has to do with anything.

Trump’s legal strategy does not seem to be intent on winning in court. His intent seems to be creating mass doubt in the public who would pressure Republican legislature in enough states to place their own electors for him.

This does not require that he have a rational basis, only that he be convincing enough to place political pressure on the right people.

This is why his rhetoric matters and why it’s important that we push back against false narratives that could potentially overturn the valid results of the election.

What?!?!?!? That was the primary source of 4 yrs of Russia Conspiracy BS. Dude, you don't know very much.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Nothing to see here

Benford's law applies to cases of exponential growth covering multiple orders of magnitude. That describes financial accounting, where compound interest rules and amounts of money can range from $1 to $1 billion, but it doesn't describe elections.

You used the example of Chicago. In Chicago, 98% of the precincts are between 100 and 999 voters in size, averaging around 500. Given that urban voters favor Biden, it's statistically expected that Trump will have many precincts with 1xx votes, while Biden will have many with 3xx votes. That's not a violation of Benford's law because Benford's law doesn't apply.

I will give you one thing, you actually tried. You just failed, and you're still batting .000 in presenting any evidence of fraud. If you wish to present any such evidence, we're all still here ready to discuss it with you. Just be specific with your claims, and back them up with hard evidence.

Every other Trump backer here is encouraged to do the same. Just understand that if you don't, and you keep whining anyways, the world will correctly assume you're making it all up out of sore-loser butthurt. Put up or shut up.

Never said fraud. I said it is a statistical anomaly.

 

[colfax_m]

What?!?!?!? That was the primary source of 4 yrs of Russia Conspiracy BS. Dude, you don't know very much.

The FISA warrant for Carter Page had little if any impact on anything. The Russian government was very involved in the election to support Trump, which I don’t think he’s ever admitted.

I keep repeating myself, the election itself was not questioned. Clinton concedes. Obama transferred power with full cooperation.

Comparing the two is not rational.

 

[okfine]

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal
The obvious -- and overwhelming -- evidence.​

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal | FrontpageMag

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are

www.frontpagemag.com

18 Nov 2020 ~~ By Jack Kerwick

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are insisting that President Donald J. Trump has yet to supply any “proof” to substantiate his thesis that there has been voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election race.
Before proceeding, let me put the reader on notice that I have long since stopped trying to convince partisan ideologues who lean even remotely leftward to recognize the error of their ways, to say nothing of the egregiousness of the errors of their anti-Trump biases. What follows is aimed only at those who are genuinely interested in reason, in logic, and, critically, in facts.

This column is an irrationality-free zone.
For starters, it most definitely is not just Trump and his army of lawyers who are leveling allegations of voter fraud. Approximately 73 million Americans who voted to make American history and re-elect the President in numbers both appreciably greater than had voted for him in 2016 and that had ever been achieved by any other American presidential candidate also believe that these allegations are rooted in reality.
Thus, they are convinced that their vote has been suppressed. They have been, in effect, disenfranchised.
Second, while it is undoubtedly the case that intellectual dishonesty is endemic to the media class, what accounts for this is that the latter is comprised of, at best, intellectual mediocrities, lightweights who exhibit not only little if any acquaintance with a classical—a genuine—liberal arts education, but average, or below average, intelligence. The painful lack of erudition and critical thinking ability among the talkers and scribblers explains, at least to no slight extent, the staggering ease with which they make pronouncements that could be made by only idiots and liars.
This isn’t meant as a criticism. It’s a fact that must be stated in order to grasp why it is futile to note to a journalist or a commentator, especially a Trump-hating one, that the concept of proof, like the concepts of love, hate, fairness, and any number of others, is most assuredly not a unitary one.
~[snip]~
The successful night had by Congressional Republicans and state legislatures and the hugely disappointing one suffered by Democrats; thousands of sworn affidavits attesting to voter fraud; Biden’s votes’ violation of the mathematical principle known as “Benford’s Law,” as well as other analyses conducted by data analysts demonstrating the virtual statistical certainty that the Democrat challenger lost; scores of anecdotal accounts offered by eye witnesses, voters, on the ground (e.g.“SharpeeGate”); Biden’s underperformance relative to Hillary Clinton and, remarkably, Barack Obama in 2008 in just those Democrat strongholds that were already a given for any Democrat candidate, but his overperformance in only the battleground areas; the “irregularities” of the voting machines that were used in many states but for which the company that distributes them, Dominion, is widely known—the preponderance of evidence that Democrats “meddled” in the election of 2020 and stole victory from Trump is not only mounting; it eclipses astronomically the fake evidence on the basis of which Democrats in Congress and Big Media have been anchoring their charge of “Russian meddling” in the election of 2016 for the last four years.
Where’s the proof that the Democrats are guilty in spades of precisely that with which they have been incessantly (stupidly, dishonestly) charging Trump, Vladimir Putin, and “the Russians?” It is ubiquitous, comprised of numerous considerations that all with the will to see can discern for themselves.


Comment:
Strangely, The media expects us all to believe a candidate who barely left his basement, limited his campaign, shows signs of dementia, is tainted with scandals, is lucky to draw a couple dozen supporters when he does speak publicly, whose party supports riots and defunding the police, pledges to stop oil drilling and fracking, somehow managed to obliterate Obama's 2008 record vote total by roughly 10 million votes with nearly 80 million in total. Needless to say, the contradictions involved in this election and the supposed end result feel like an episode of the Twilight Zone....
The evidence is cumulative. The 'Dead Voting', Statistical improbability, Dominion Software moving votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of sworn testimonies, newly discovered discarded ballots by the thousands, memory cards being found with votes for TRump, etc. — ALL OF THEM FAVORING BIDEN.
So, in regards to the first question — ABSOLUTELY.
In regards to the second question: Was the fraud sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden? The answer is YES!!
The one factor that has the potential to shift votes by the hundreds of thousands from Biden to Trump is the software used to tabulate the votes. Sidney Powell has been on top of this from the get go.... she better deliver because answering the second question very tough.
No one has yet come up with a reasonable explanation as to HOW most of the Republican candidates down ballot won and expanded the GOP population in the House; but, Trump "lost". This by itself does not pass the smell test.
The evidence presented is SOLID ENOUGH to justify state wide audits and recounts ( re-vote even ).

I gotta ask. Why do you waste your time with these lengthy posts? Donald Trump was a terrible President. So the voters showed him the door. There is no credible evidence of voter fraud. All of Trump's lawsuits concerning fraud are being dismissed. You've presented nothing that is anything approaching evidence. Just alt-right talking points.
He lost. Deal with it and move on.

i gotta ask, why do you waste our time on your posts? you are a terrible poster and a liar. you have no credible evidence of anything, ever. TRUMP is the best president to serve AMERICA, you fucking commie

Can't get your way you cry. Can you count to 306?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.

Clinton conceded the day after the election. There was no narrative that the election was stolen by criminal voter fraud. This is a false equivalency.

Clinton did and then went on talk shows and such and cried that she was robbed. Democrats for the next 4 years tried to undermine and even impeached Trump. Media was complicit. You don't know what "false equivalency" means. They announced Abrams as the Governor of GA at the the DNC, did they not? LOL

They name streets after you...ONE WAY.

No she didn't. She conceded gracefully and Obama provided a smooth transition of power. She didn't make those rounds till months later. Russian investigation didn't begin until well AFTER the inauguration.

And..sorry. Brian Kemp stole the GA governor's seat from Stacy Abrams. He was the SOS who made the election rules. Bet he's kicking himself in the ass for that right now, huh?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What?!?!?!? That was the primary source of 4 yrs of Russia Conspiracy BS. Dude, you don't know very much.

The FISA warrant for Carter Page had little if any impact on anything. The Russian government was very involved in the election to support Trump, which I don’t think he’s ever admitted.

I keep repeating myself, the election itself was not questioned. Clinton concedes. Obama transferred power with full cooperation.

Comparing the two is not rational.

Who was the President during the 2016 election?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.

Clinton conceded the day after the election. There was no narrative that the election was stolen by criminal voter fraud. This is a false equivalency.

Clinton did and then went on talk shows and such and cried that she was robbed. Democrats for the next 4 years tried to undermine and even impeached Trump. Media was complicit. You don't know what "false equivalency" means. They announced Abrams as the Governor of GA at the the DNC, did they not? LOL

They name streets after you...ONE WAY.

No she didn't. She conceded gracefully and Obama provided a smooth transition of power. She didn't make those rounds till months later. Russian investigation didn't begin until well AFTER the inauguration.

And..sorry. Brian Kemp stole the GA governor's seat from Stacy Abrams. He was the SOS who made the election rules. Bet he's kicking himself in the ass for that right now, huh?

Ahhh there it is. Kemp "stole" it....

 

[colfax_m]

What?!?!?!? That was the primary source of 4 yrs of Russia Conspiracy BS. Dude, you don't know very much.

The FISA warrant for Carter Page had little if any impact on anything. The Russian government was very involved in the election to support Trump, which I don’t think he’s ever admitted.

I keep repeating myself, the election itself was not questioned. Clinton concedes. Obama transferred power with full cooperation.

Comparing the two is not rational.

Who was the President during the 2016 election?

We both know the answer and we both know we both know.

If you have a point, make it.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What?!?!?!? That was the primary source of 4 yrs of Russia Conspiracy BS. Dude, you don't know very much.

The FISA warrant for Carter Page had little if any impact on anything. The Russian government was very involved in the election to support Trump, which I don’t think he’s ever admitted.

I keep repeating myself, the election itself was not questioned. Clinton concedes. Obama transferred power with full cooperation.

Comparing the two is not rational.

Who was the President during the 2016 election?

We both know the answer and we both know we both know.

If you have a point, make it.

Point is he should have stopped it not the person running.

 

[colfax_m]

Point is he should have stopped it not the person running.

That is not relevant.

What is relevant is that Clinton had a rational basis for her complaints about the campaign but she did not question the legitimacy of the election. Neither did Obama.

Trump is doing so, with no rational basis, and it is grossly irresponsible.

Comparing these two situations is illogical.

 

[Flopper]

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal
The obvious -- and overwhelming -- evidence.​

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal | FrontpageMag

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are

www.frontpagemag.com

18 Nov 2020 ~~ By Jack Kerwick

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are insisting that President Donald J. Trump has yet to supply any “proof” to substantiate his thesis that there has been voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election race.
Before proceeding, let me put the reader on notice that I have long since stopped trying to convince partisan ideologues who lean even remotely leftward to recognize the error of their ways, to say nothing of the egregiousness of the errors of their anti-Trump biases. What follows is aimed only at those who are genuinely interested in reason, in logic, and, critically, in facts.

This column is an irrationality-free zone.
For starters, it most definitely is not just Trump and his army of lawyers who are leveling allegations of voter fraud. Approximately 73 million Americans who voted to make American history and re-elect the President in numbers both appreciably greater than had voted for him in 2016 and that had ever been achieved by any other American presidential candidate also believe that these allegations are rooted in reality.
Thus, they are convinced that their vote has been suppressed. They have been, in effect, disenfranchised.
Second, while it is undoubtedly the case that intellectual dishonesty is endemic to the media class, what accounts for this is that the latter is comprised of, at best, intellectual mediocrities, lightweights who exhibit not only little if any acquaintance with a classical—a genuine—liberal arts education, but average, or below average, intelligence. The painful lack of erudition and critical thinking ability among the talkers and scribblers explains, at least to no slight extent, the staggering ease with which they make pronouncements that could be made by only idiots and liars.
This isn’t meant as a criticism. It’s a fact that must be stated in order to grasp why it is futile to note to a journalist or a commentator, especially a Trump-hating one, that the concept of proof, like the concepts of love, hate, fairness, and any number of others, is most assuredly not a unitary one.
~[snip]~
The successful night had by Congressional Republicans and state legislatures and the hugely disappointing one suffered by Democrats; thousands of sworn affidavits attesting to voter fraud; Biden’s votes’ violation of the mathematical principle known as “Benford’s Law,” as well as other analyses conducted by data analysts demonstrating the virtual statistical certainty that the Democrat challenger lost; scores of anecdotal accounts offered by eye witnesses, voters, on the ground (e.g.“SharpeeGate”); Biden’s underperformance relative to Hillary Clinton and, remarkably, Barack Obama in 2008 in just those Democrat strongholds that were already a given for any Democrat candidate, but his overperformance in only the battleground areas; the “irregularities” of the voting machines that were used in many states but for which the company that distributes them, Dominion, is widely known—the preponderance of evidence that Democrats “meddled” in the election of 2020 and stole victory from Trump is not only mounting; it eclipses astronomically the fake evidence on the basis of which Democrats in Congress and Big Media have been anchoring their charge of “Russian meddling” in the election of 2016 for the last four years.
Where’s the proof that the Democrats are guilty in spades of precisely that with which they have been incessantly (stupidly, dishonestly) charging Trump, Vladimir Putin, and “the Russians?” It is ubiquitous, comprised of numerous considerations that all with the will to see can discern for themselves.


Comment:
Strangely, The media expects us all to believe a candidate who barely left his basement, limited his campaign, shows signs of dementia, is tainted with scandals, is lucky to draw a couple dozen supporters when he does speak publicly, whose party supports riots and defunding the police, pledges to stop oil drilling and fracking, somehow managed to obliterate Obama's 2008 record vote total by roughly 10 million votes with nearly 80 million in total. Needless to say, the contradictions involved in this election and the supposed end result feel like an episode of the Twilight Zone....
The evidence is cumulative. The 'Dead Voting', Statistical improbability, Dominion Software moving votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of sworn testimonies, newly discovered discarded ballots by the thousands, memory cards being found with votes for TRump, etc. — ALL OF THEM FAVORING BIDEN.
So, in regards to the first question — ABSOLUTELY.
In regards to the second question: Was the fraud sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden? The answer is YES!!
The one factor that has the potential to shift votes by the hundreds of thousands from Biden to Trump is the software used to tabulate the votes. Sidney Powell has been on top of this from the get go.... she better deliver because answering the second question very tough.
No one has yet come up with a reasonable explanation as to HOW most of the Republican candidates down ballot won and expanded the GOP population in the House; but, Trump "lost". This by itself does not pass the smell test.
The evidence presented is SOLID ENOUGH to justify state wide audits and recounts ( re-vote even ).

Neither You nor your link offers any proof that democrats stole the election unless by stole you mean they won the election by conducting a campaign based on Trump's incompetent leadership. Trump has launch 35 lawsuits and all failed to change one single vote because there was no proof of the systemic voter fraud or the rigging of the election that Trump claimed. His attempts to pressure elections boards to stop country and state certification is failing as well.

Your link raises the question as to what is proof. Not being a student of the law I don't know, but one thing is for sure, Trump tweets about a rigged elections, differences in voting patterns, eye witness to rumors, claims of voter fraud based not based on what actually happened but what might have happened are certain not proof rigged elections.

Next Monday and Tuesday, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Nevada will certify the election and forward the certification to the governor to create the Certification of Ascertainment. By Thanksgiving the Fat Lady will be singing and Trump will finally get the beating he so richly deservers.

 

[Toro]

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal
The obvious -- and overwhelming -- evidence.​

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal | FrontpageMag

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are

www.frontpagemag.com

18 Nov 2020 ~~ By Jack Kerwick

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are insisting that President Donald J. Trump has yet to supply any “proof” to substantiate his thesis that there has been voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election race.
Before proceeding, let me put the reader on notice that I have long since stopped trying to convince partisan ideologues who lean even remotely leftward to recognize the error of their ways, to say nothing of the egregiousness of the errors of their anti-Trump biases. What follows is aimed only at those who are genuinely interested in reason, in logic, and, critically, in facts.

This column is an irrationality-free zone.
For starters, it most definitely is not just Trump and his army of lawyers who are leveling allegations of voter fraud. Approximately 73 million Americans who voted to make American history and re-elect the President in numbers both appreciably greater than had voted for him in 2016 and that had ever been achieved by any other American presidential candidate also believe that these allegations are rooted in reality.
Thus, they are convinced that their vote has been suppressed. They have been, in effect, disenfranchised.
Second, while it is undoubtedly the case that intellectual dishonesty is endemic to the media class, what accounts for this is that the latter is comprised of, at best, intellectual mediocrities, lightweights who exhibit not only little if any acquaintance with a classical—a genuine—liberal arts education, but average, or below average, intelligence. The painful lack of erudition and critical thinking ability among the talkers and scribblers explains, at least to no slight extent, the staggering ease with which they make pronouncements that could be made by only idiots and liars.
This isn’t meant as a criticism. It’s a fact that must be stated in order to grasp why it is futile to note to a journalist or a commentator, especially a Trump-hating one, that the concept of proof, like the concepts of love, hate, fairness, and any number of others, is most assuredly not a unitary one.
~[snip]~
The successful night had by Congressional Republicans and state legislatures and the hugely disappointing one suffered by Democrats; thousands of sworn affidavits attesting to voter fraud; Biden’s votes’ violation of the mathematical principle known as “Benford’s Law,” as well as other analyses conducted by data analysts demonstrating the virtual statistical certainty that the Democrat challenger lost; scores of anecdotal accounts offered by eye witnesses, voters, on the ground (e.g.“SharpeeGate”); Biden’s underperformance relative to Hillary Clinton and, remarkably, Barack Obama in 2008 in just those Democrat strongholds that were already a given for any Democrat candidate, but his overperformance in only the battleground areas; the “irregularities” of the voting machines that were used in many states but for which the company that distributes them, Dominion, is widely known—the preponderance of evidence that Democrats “meddled” in the election of 2020 and stole victory from Trump is not only mounting; it eclipses astronomically the fake evidence on the basis of which Democrats in Congress and Big Media have been anchoring their charge of “Russian meddling” in the election of 2016 for the last four years.
Where’s the proof that the Democrats are guilty in spades of precisely that with which they have been incessantly (stupidly, dishonestly) charging Trump, Vladimir Putin, and “the Russians?” It is ubiquitous, comprised of numerous considerations that all with the will to see can discern for themselves.


Comment:
Strangely, The media expects us all to believe a candidate who barely left his basement, limited his campaign, shows signs of dementia, is tainted with scandals, is lucky to draw a couple dozen supporters when he does speak publicly, whose party supports riots and defunding the police, pledges to stop oil drilling and fracking, somehow managed to obliterate Obama's 2008 record vote total by roughly 10 million votes with nearly 80 million in total. Needless to say, the contradictions involved in this election and the supposed end result feel like an episode of the Twilight Zone....
The evidence is cumulative. The 'Dead Voting', Statistical improbability, Dominion Software moving votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of sworn testimonies, newly discovered discarded ballots by the thousands, memory cards being found with votes for TRump, etc. — ALL OF THEM FAVORING BIDEN.
So, in regards to the first question — ABSOLUTELY.
In regards to the second question: Was the fraud sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden? The answer is YES!!
The one factor that has the potential to shift votes by the hundreds of thousands from Biden to Trump is the software used to tabulate the votes. Sidney Powell has been on top of this from the get go.... she better deliver because answering the second question very tough.
No one has yet come up with a reasonable explanation as to HOW most of the Republican candidates down ballot won and expanded the GOP population in the House; but, Trump "lost". This by itself does not pass the smell test.
The evidence presented is SOLID ENOUGH to justify state wide audits and recounts ( re-vote even ).

lol

nutters

 

[Flopper]

How long should we give the blue district thieves to count the fucking votes?...ten years?....this is insanity.....everyone can see what is going on....

Almost all elections will be certified in the next two weeks. Electors meet in about 4 weeks.

If you have a problem with some states taking too long to count the vote, then bring it up with the state legislatures who could allow them to process ballots before Election Day like they do in most states.

The reality this year, was that counting votes took longer due to the coronavirus changes. That’s fine. In fact, it’s proof positive that our vote processing people were doing their job exactly as they should. Democrats favored mail voting and republicans favored in person voting at the polls or early voting. The fact that mail votes take much longer to process than in person voting created a situation in which election night reporting trended toward republicans and later reporting trended toward democrats. This indicates that vote processing is as predicted, not that there was any wrong doing as many claim.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

In all that butthurt whining, there was no proof presented, or any evidence of any sort. You may have not have noticed, given that you're just a propaganda parrot, but everyone else did.

How much does the dnc pay you shills to lie? You shill are the propaganda parrot and oh the hypocrisy,that’s all you trump haters did for four years was whine about him being president ten times more often than trump fans did the entire time in 8 years obama was in office.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal
The obvious -- and overwhelming -- evidence.​

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal | FrontpageMag

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are

www.frontpagemag.com

18 Nov 2020 ~~ By Jack Kerwick

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are insisting that President Donald J. Trump has yet to supply any “proof” to substantiate his thesis that there has been voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election race.
Before proceeding, let me put the reader on notice that I have long since stopped trying to convince partisan ideologues who lean even remotely leftward to recognize the error of their ways, to say nothing of the egregiousness of the errors of their anti-Trump biases. What follows is aimed only at those who are genuinely interested in reason, in logic, and, critically, in facts.

This column is an irrationality-free zone.
For starters, it most definitely is not just Trump and his army of lawyers who are leveling allegations of voter fraud. Approximately 73 million Americans who voted to make American history and re-elect the President in numbers both appreciably greater than had voted for him in 2016 and that had ever been achieved by any other American presidential candidate also believe that these allegations are rooted in reality.
Thus, they are convinced that their vote has been suppressed. They have been, in effect, disenfranchised.
Second, while it is undoubtedly the case that intellectual dishonesty is endemic to the media class, what accounts for this is that the latter is comprised of, at best, intellectual mediocrities, lightweights who exhibit not only little if any acquaintance with a classical—a genuine—liberal arts education, but average, or below average, intelligence. The painful lack of erudition and critical thinking ability among the talkers and scribblers explains, at least to no slight extent, the staggering ease with which they make pronouncements that could be made by only idiots and liars.
This isn’t meant as a criticism. It’s a fact that must be stated in order to grasp why it is futile to note to a journalist or a commentator, especially a Trump-hating one, that the concept of proof, like the concepts of love, hate, fairness, and any number of others, is most assuredly not a unitary one.
~[snip]~
The successful night had by Congressional Republicans and state legislatures and the hugely disappointing one suffered by Democrats; thousands of sworn affidavits attesting to voter fraud; Biden’s votes’ violation of the mathematical principle known as “Benford’s Law,” as well as other analyses conducted by data analysts demonstrating the virtual statistical certainty that the Democrat challenger lost; scores of anecdotal accounts offered by eye witnesses, voters, on the ground (e.g.“SharpeeGate”); Biden’s underperformance relative to Hillary Clinton and, remarkably, Barack Obama in 2008 in just those Democrat strongholds that were already a given for any Democrat candidate, but his overperformance in only the battleground areas; the “irregularities” of the voting machines that were used in many states but for which the company that distributes them, Dominion, is widely known—the preponderance of evidence that Democrats “meddled” in the election of 2020 and stole victory from Trump is not only mounting; it eclipses astronomically the fake evidence on the basis of which Democrats in Congress and Big Media have been anchoring their charge of “Russian meddling” in the election of 2016 for the last four years.
Where’s the proof that the Democrats are guilty in spades of precisely that with which they have been incessantly (stupidly, dishonestly) charging Trump, Vladimir Putin, and “the Russians?” It is ubiquitous, comprised of numerous considerations that all with the will to see can discern for themselves.


Comment:
Strangely, The media expects us all to believe a candidate who barely left his basement, limited his campaign, shows signs of dementia, is tainted with scandals, is lucky to draw a couple dozen supporters when he does speak publicly, whose party supports riots and defunding the police, pledges to stop oil drilling and fracking, somehow managed to obliterate Obama's 2008 record vote total by roughly 10 million votes with nearly 80 million in total. Needless to say, the contradictions involved in this election and the supposed end result feel like an episode of the Twilight Zone....
The evidence is cumulative. The 'Dead Voting', Statistical improbability, Dominion Software moving votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of sworn testimonies, newly discovered discarded ballots by the thousands, memory cards being found with votes for TRump, etc. — ALL OF THEM FAVORING BIDEN.
So, in regards to the first question — ABSOLUTELY.
In regards to the second question: Was the fraud sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden? The answer is YES!!
The one factor that has the potential to shift votes by the hundreds of thousands from Biden to Trump is the software used to tabulate the votes. Sidney Powell has been on top of this from the get go.... she better deliver because answering the second question very tough.
No one has yet come up with a reasonable explanation as to HOW most of the Republican candidates down ballot won and expanded the GOP population in the House; but, Trump "lost". This by itself does not pass the smell test.
The evidence presented is SOLID ENOUGH to justify state wide audits and recounts ( re-vote even ).

Get over it. Biden leads with over 7 Million votes. The voters did exactly what they wanted. To rid this country of an autocrat. To rid this country of a liar. To rid this country of an anti-democratic con artist. I can keep going, but the people spoke. How do you like them apples?

Hey stupid fuck,ALL presidents lie. You shills want this con artist lying biden in.lol

 

[mamooth]

How much does the dnc pay you shills to lie?

And after trying to deflect with that pouty bitch-tantrum, the fact is you still haven't presented any evidence for fraud, and you're still a lying fascist traitor.

Sucks to be you, loser.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal
The obvious -- and overwhelming -- evidence.​

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal | FrontpageMag

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are

www.frontpagemag.com

18 Nov 2020 ~~ By Jack Kerwick

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are insisting that President Donald J. Trump has yet to supply any “proof” to substantiate his thesis that there has been voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election race.
Before proceeding, let me put the reader on notice that I have long since stopped trying to convince partisan ideologues who lean even remotely leftward to recognize the error of their ways, to say nothing of the egregiousness of the errors of their anti-Trump biases. What follows is aimed only at those who are genuinely interested in reason, in logic, and, critically, in facts.

This column is an irrationality-free zone.
For starters, it most definitely is not just Trump and his army of lawyers who are leveling allegations of voter fraud. Approximately 73 million Americans who voted to make American history and re-elect the President in numbers both appreciably greater than had voted for him in 2016 and that had ever been achieved by any other American presidential candidate also believe that these allegations are rooted in reality.
Thus, they are convinced that their vote has been suppressed. They have been, in effect, disenfranchised.
Second, while it is undoubtedly the case that intellectual dishonesty is endemic to the media class, what accounts for this is that the latter is comprised of, at best, intellectual mediocrities, lightweights who exhibit not only little if any acquaintance with a classical—a genuine—liberal arts education, but average, or below average, intelligence. The painful lack of erudition and critical thinking ability among the talkers and scribblers explains, at least to no slight extent, the staggering ease with which they make pronouncements that could be made by only idiots and liars.
This isn’t meant as a criticism. It’s a fact that must be stated in order to grasp why it is futile to note to a journalist or a commentator, especially a Trump-hating one, that the concept of proof, like the concepts of love, hate, fairness, and any number of others, is most assuredly not a unitary one.
~[snip]~
The successful night had by Congressional Republicans and state legislatures and the hugely disappointing one suffered by Democrats; thousands of sworn affidavits attesting to voter fraud; Biden’s votes’ violation of the mathematical principle known as “Benford’s Law,” as well as other analyses conducted by data analysts demonstrating the virtual statistical certainty that the Democrat challenger lost; scores of anecdotal accounts offered by eye witnesses, voters, on the ground (e.g.“SharpeeGate”); Biden’s underperformance relative to Hillary Clinton and, remarkably, Barack Obama in 2008 in just those Democrat strongholds that were already a given for any Democrat candidate, but his overperformance in only the battleground areas; the “irregularities” of the voting machines that were used in many states but for which the company that distributes them, Dominion, is widely known—the preponderance of evidence that Democrats “meddled” in the election of 2020 and stole victory from Trump is not only mounting; it eclipses astronomically the fake evidence on the basis of which Democrats in Congress and Big Media have been anchoring their charge of “Russian meddling” in the election of 2016 for the last four years.
Where’s the proof that the Democrats are guilty in spades of precisely that with which they have been incessantly (stupidly, dishonestly) charging Trump, Vladimir Putin, and “the Russians?” It is ubiquitous, comprised of numerous considerations that all with the will to see can discern for themselves.


Comment:
Strangely, The media expects us all to believe a candidate who barely left his basement, limited his campaign, shows signs of dementia, is tainted with scandals, is lucky to draw a couple dozen supporters when he does speak publicly, whose party supports riots and defunding the police, pledges to stop oil drilling and fracking, somehow managed to obliterate Obama's 2008 record vote total by roughly 10 million votes with nearly 80 million in total. Needless to say, the contradictions involved in this election and the supposed end result feel like an episode of the Twilight Zone....
The evidence is cumulative. The 'Dead Voting', Statistical improbability, Dominion Software moving votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of sworn testimonies, newly discovered discarded ballots by the thousands, memory cards being found with votes for TRump, etc. — ALL OF THEM FAVORING BIDEN.
So, in regards to the first question — ABSOLUTELY.
In regards to the second question: Was the fraud sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden? The answer is YES!!
The one factor that has the potential to shift votes by the hundreds of thousands from Biden to Trump is the software used to tabulate the votes. Sidney Powell has been on top of this from the get go.... she better deliver because answering the second question very tough.
No one has yet come up with a reasonable explanation as to HOW most of the Republican candidates down ballot won and expanded the GOP population in the House; but, Trump "lost". This by itself does not pass the smell test.
The evidence presented is SOLID ENOUGH to justify state wide audits and recounts ( re-vote even ).

you just took the trump haters to school,I see they did not read this,they just saw the title and trolled on the thread as they always do fling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are,lol
All

 

[LA RAM FAN]

How much does the dnc pay you shills to lie?

And after trying to deflect with that pouty bitch-tantrum, the fact is you still haven't presented any evidence for fraud, and you're still a lying fascist traitor.

Sucks to be you, loser.

The only one deflecting and having a tatrem is you,your the one deflecting not even trying to counter his facts he gave in the op,you could not counter so you shoot the messenger of the op,how mature,I see you also deflecting over the facts that you whined on and on for four years on trump being elected like the crybaby you are. And you keep on believing those lies no evidence was presented shill.keep telling yourselves whistleblowers were lying,yeah riiiiiiigggggghhhhhttt.grow up.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The truth will come out...and then people will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.....they are not stealing this from Bush....or Romney...they are trying to steal a landslide win from Trump....I would not want to be them right now......

Dude you’re dreaming,politicians get away with crimes everyday we go to jail for,that’s not going to change all of a sudden.lol

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal
The obvious -- and overwhelming -- evidence.​

Proof of the Dems' Election Steal | FrontpageMag

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are

www.frontpagemag.com

18 Nov 2020 ~~ By Jack Kerwick

The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are insisting that President Donald J. Trump has yet to supply any “proof” to substantiate his thesis that there has been voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election race.
Before proceeding, let me put the reader on notice that I have long since stopped trying to convince partisan ideologues who lean even remotely leftward to recognize the error of their ways, to say nothing of the egregiousness of the errors of their anti-Trump biases. What follows is aimed only at those who are genuinely interested in reason, in logic, and, critically, in facts.

This column is an irrationality-free zone.
For starters, it most definitely is not just Trump and his army of lawyers who are leveling allegations of voter fraud. Approximately 73 million Americans who voted to make American history and re-elect the President in numbers both appreciably greater than had voted for him in 2016 and that had ever been achieved by any other American presidential candidate also believe that these allegations are rooted in reality.
Thus, they are convinced that their vote has been suppressed. They have been, in effect, disenfranchised.
Second, while it is undoubtedly the case that intellectual dishonesty is endemic to the media class, what accounts for this is that the latter is comprised of, at best, intellectual mediocrities, lightweights who exhibit not only little if any acquaintance with a classical—a genuine—liberal arts education, but average, or below average, intelligence. The painful lack of erudition and critical thinking ability among the talkers and scribblers explains, at least to no slight extent, the staggering ease with which they make pronouncements that could be made by only idiots and liars.
This isn’t meant as a criticism. It’s a fact that must be stated in order to grasp why it is futile to note to a journalist or a commentator, especially a Trump-hating one, that the concept of proof, like the concepts of love, hate, fairness, and any number of others, is most assuredly not a unitary one.
~[snip]~
The successful night had by Congressional Republicans and state legislatures and the hugely disappointing one suffered by Democrats; thousands of sworn affidavits attesting to voter fraud; Biden’s votes’ violation of the mathematical principle known as “Benford’s Law,” as well as other analyses conducted by data analysts demonstrating the virtual statistical certainty that the Democrat challenger lost; scores of anecdotal accounts offered by eye witnesses, voters, on the ground (e.g.“SharpeeGate”); Biden’s underperformance relative to Hillary Clinton and, remarkably, Barack Obama in 2008 in just those Democrat strongholds that were already a given for any Democrat candidate, but his overperformance in only the battleground areas; the “irregularities” of the voting machines that were used in many states but for which the company that distributes them, Dominion, is widely known—the preponderance of evidence that Democrats “meddled” in the election of 2020 and stole victory from Trump is not only mounting; it eclipses astronomically the fake evidence on the basis of which Democrats in Congress and Big Media have been anchoring their charge of “Russian meddling” in the election of 2016 for the last four years.
Where’s the proof that the Democrats are guilty in spades of precisely that with which they have been incessantly (stupidly, dishonestly) charging Trump, Vladimir Putin, and “the Russians?” It is ubiquitous, comprised of numerous considerations that all with the will to see can discern for themselves.


Comment:
Strangely, The media expects us all to believe a candidate who barely left his basement, limited his campaign, shows signs of dementia, is tainted with scandals, is lucky to draw a couple dozen supporters when he does speak publicly, whose party supports riots and defunding the police, pledges to stop oil drilling and fracking, somehow managed to obliterate Obama's 2008 record vote total by roughly 10 million votes with nearly 80 million in total. Needless to say, the contradictions involved in this election and the supposed end result feel like an episode of the Twilight Zone....
The evidence is cumulative. The 'Dead Voting', Statistical improbability, Dominion Software moving votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of sworn testimonies, newly discovered discarded ballots by the thousands, memory cards being found with votes for TRump, etc. — ALL OF THEM FAVORING BIDEN.
So, in regards to the first question — ABSOLUTELY.
In regards to the second question: Was the fraud sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden? The answer is YES!!
The one factor that has the potential to shift votes by the hundreds of thousands from Biden to Trump is the software used to tabulate the votes. Sidney Powell has been on top of this from the get go.... she better deliver because answering the second question very tough.
No one has yet come up with a reasonable explanation as to HOW most of the Republican candidates down ballot won and expanded the GOP population in the House; but, Trump "lost". This by itself does not pass the smell test.
The evidence presented is SOLID ENOUGH to justify state wide audits and recounts ( re-vote even ).

ok, one of the more logical and well written pieces about it.
The parts that smell funny to me about this election are as follows (some were listed above)...
- Hoe hidin’s underperformance in democrat strongholds but incredible performance in only swing states, surpassing even Obongo.
- that every time there is an error, it is an error that favors Biden.
- the numerous reports (that were even video taped and some taken to court) of Republican poll watchers being shut out.
- the swing states have Trump winning when suddenly they stop counting, and then when they resume biden makes a stunning comeback and wins in all Of them??
- republicans whipped ass in the down ballot voting, everywhere. Yet we are to believe that people hated Trump, but wanted to put other republicans in power???
- the data analysis that says the voting patterns are shady.

And then there is my anecdotal. Despite constant bashing, trumps approval rating was higher than Obama’s. People I spoke to were itching to get out and vote for Trump. Trump had huge rallies, flags were everywhere, bumper stickers, etc. And I’ve never had so many black folks in my life tell me (unsolicited) that they were voting for a Republican as I’ve seen this time got trump.
Contrast that to Biden who had zero enthusiasm. Even in blue areas, I’d only see the occasional bumper sticker. No flags, shirts, hats, signs, etc.
Yet I am supposed to believe that record numbers of people went out vote for Biden?

Obviously I am biased. I want Trump, I don’t want Biden. But it looks very, very shady to me. If these events unfolded with the names switched, I’d still think It looks just as shady and seriously needs to be investigated.
In my opinion, yeah there may have been fake ballots, maybe. But I’d bet solid money the rigging was done (if there was cheating) with the machines keeping the counts.

Careful beef,the trump haters will accuse you of whining by bringing up all those fishy facts you listed.