Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nope. It's a simple matter of whether or not the right to do as you will with you body extends to acts which harm another or not.This is a trick question, isn't it?
You can't have it both ways. Either my right to do as I will with and to my own body extends to acts which cause harm to another or it does not.
But it is a trick question - in a sense.
In some cases, we, as a society believe in one's "right" to have control over our bodies but only within certain boundaries.
Your question: does a man have the "right" to rape a woman, if that's what he so desires - to have personal "control" over his being or does he forfeit that "right" by virtue of causing harm to another person's being
VS.
does a woman have the "right" to have an abortion if she so desires - to have personal "control" over her being or does she forfeit that "right" by virtue of causing harm to another person's being (the baby).
We are programmed to believe - a majority anyway - that women should have complete control over their bodies
However, a man exercising his reproductive prerogative in the scenario you described above is a different kettle of fish altogether.
I wasn't advocating women killing babies or men raping women ... or anyone else.
I was merely breaking down the question - showing the parallels. It is a double standard for sure and I'll be the first to say so.
My youngest nephew was born at 28 weeks. Theoretically, late-term abortions can still be done then, right?
You'd have to ask them. Apparently they think that your geographical location has something to do with whether or not killing you is okay. In that regard, they're much like the Nationalists who have no problem with bombs and napalm killing and maiming children so long as they live someplace elseSo why do people think that if a baby is in utero at that time, they are not considered a child and can be scrambled, as opposed to him being delivered (as he was) and him being an absolutely beautiful child - viable and everything?
Typo. Apparently, you can't change poll answers like you can the regular post."anri-rape"?
I'm watching a movie and I neglected to proofread
This is a trick question, isn't it?
Nope. It's a simple matter of whether or not the right to do as you will with you body extends to acts which harm another or not.This is a trick question, isn't it?
So, does my right to do as I will with my body include harming another? Or are suicide bombings (it is, after all, my body i strap the bomb to), rape (after all, I'm just exercising my right to use my body as i will [overpowering you] just as you do the same with your own body [physically resist or go along with it]), and punching you in the face (moving my body through space) wrong because they cause harm another?
You can't have it both ways. Either my right to do as I will with and to my own body extends to acts which cause harm to another or it does not.
This is a trick question, isn't it?
Sure is. Does do a good job of exposing the indefensible position many "pro Choicers" hold. It's all about choice to them, just don't mention that many times, the fetus aborted could have been a viable life outside the womb, and had NO CHOICE at all.
You have control of your body and no other.
So you're not viable until you have can find your own food when set down and left to die?This is a trick question, isn't it?
Sure is. Does do a good job of exposing the indefensible position many "pro Choicers" hold. It's all about choice to them, just don't mention that many times, the fetus aborted could have been a viable life outside the womb, and had NO CHOICE at all.
Cesarean section what ever it is out, sit it on the table and let it live. No abortion required. If it does not "live" then it is not a viable life.
This is a trick question, isn't it?
Sure is. Does do a good job of exposing the indefensible position many "pro Choicers" hold. It's all about choice to them, just don't mention that many times, the fetus aborted could have been a viable life outside the womb, and had NO CHOICE at all.
Cesarean section what ever it is out, sit it on the table and let it live. No abortion required. If it does not "live" then it is not a viable life.