Princeton Economist: Romney Tax Plan Mathematically Sound

Discussion in 'Election Forums' started by longknife, Oct 8, 2012.

  1. longknife
    Online

    longknife Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    25,135
    Thanks Received:
    8,300
    Trophy Points:
    900
    Location:
    Sin City
    Ratings:
    +13,486
    Bill Clinton, President Barack Obama, and liberal think tanks have claimed Mitt Romney's plan to cut tax rates across the board by 20 percent is bad arithmetic, but a Princeton economics professor, Harvey Rosen, examined Romney's proposals in a paper and concluded Romney's plan would work. The economy would have to grow by 3 percentage points more over the term of his plan than it would have without his plan.

    Liberals, who often do not understand how the economy works let alone how to expand the economic pie, failed to work in their assumptions that the purpose of Romney's tax cuts is to actually grow the economy, which would make people more prosperous. And as the economy grows and more people get jobs, the government would get more tax dollars.

    The Tax Policy Center, which is affiliated with the center-left Brookings Institution and Urban Institute, analyzed Romney's tax plan assuming there would be zero economic growth. The lead analyst in the Tax Policy Center's study was a former Obama administration official.

    "At the same time, the TPC model assumes that regardless of the tax rate, people work the
    same amount, save the same amount, and invest the same amount," Rosen wrote in his paper. "Thus, changes in the tax code have no effect on the amount of before-tax income."

    And, as The Weekly Standard pointed out, there are "at least three critical flaws" with the the TPC study:

    (1) it assumes pro-growth tax reform can't actually produce economic growth, (2) it assumes two tax expenditures worth $45 billion per year are not 'on the table', and (3) it assumes tax reform must pay for repealing Obamacare's tax hikes, rather than assuming that the repeal of Obamacare's spending will pay for repealing the tax hikes.

    If these assumptions are taken away, Romney's plan becomes more feasible.

    Rosen also wrote that "it seems odd to assume away possible increases in incomes associated with a
    given tax reform proposal when its explicit goal is to enhance growth."

    "Rather, a more sensible approach is to consider alternative assumptions about how tax reform might affect the size of the economy, and see how they affect the substantive conclusions," Rosen wrote.

    Rosen concluded that if the economy grew, Romney's numbers would add up and that growth rate needed to make Romney's numbers add up was "not impossible."

    From Princeton Economist: Romney Tax Plan Mathematically Sound

    Amazing that this comes from a left wing university with professors to the left of Lenin. :clap2::clap2:
     
  2. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,936
    Thanks Received:
    5,211
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,676
    From the article:
    What's that mean? That the economy has to grow an ADDITIONAL 3 points over what it would normally be doing?

    GDP was revised DOWN to 1.3 in the 2nd quarter of this year so it would have to be 3 percent MORE than that at 4.3 Percent?

    When "Free Not Fair Trade Agreements" have shipped 80% of our Manufacturing Industry overseas, who actually thinks that 4-5% growth is gonna' happen?
     
  3. Dick Tuck
    Offline

    Dick Tuck Board Troll

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Messages:
    8,511
    Thanks Received:
    501
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +502
    Which plan did he look at?

    [​IMG]
     
  4. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    This is the seciond or third thread on this.

    but it is right wing oriented so it will not likely be merged.
     

Share This Page