Preview of Trump's New Plan to Defeat ISIS is released ...

[there4eyeM]

The plans are in the file beside his taxes, and will be revealed at the same time.

 

[Reasonable]

... and, guess what? ...

... it's ...

... wait for it ...

... Obama's plan!

Pentagon prepares to give the White House a stepped-up battle plan against Islamic State

Hahahahahahahahahaha ...

... what a bunch of rubes.

Ain't that a hoot. And you can be pretty sure IF the republicans ever come up with a health insurance plan it will be Obamacare pt. 2.
I said this from day one and it's becoming more obvious every day...
This serial sex offending carnival barker was the biggest con man in our nation's history.
And the Deplorables fell for it.
Fortunately most of the country didn't which gives me faith in the future.

 

[Camp]

How many of those ISIS guys been killed under the Obama plan? Heck, they are barely left in Iraq. Pretty much confined to a tiny area in Mosul. Soon they will be gone except for some random terrorist bombings on the innocent population. They have been chased and confined into Syria, you know, the place where Putin was supposed to destroy them.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Do you remember just prior to Bush invading Iraq, no one had ever hears of ISIS. Cause and effect?

Because they changed their name to ISIS in 2006.. Lol

What were thy called before that?

Al Qaeda in Iraq

Sorry buster you couldn't be farther from reality. There are two completely separate organizations. Was Al Queda in Iraq a factor before Bush invaded?

Dude you are retarded. It is common knowledge that they changed the name after Zarqawi died.

ISIS and Al Qaeda really aren't the same things. ISIS is an offshoot of Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), but AQI divested itself of it's ISIS "wing." Furthermore, the threat ISIS poses to the U.S. and others is different from that of Al Qaeda (AQ).

• Targets:
  • AQ --> Focused almost exclusively on attacking the U.S. and its allies in Europe and on attacking Israel.
  • ISIS --> Attacks anybody anywhere. As much concerned with destroying Shiites as with Westerners.
• Strategy:
  • AQ --> Deliberate, centrally coordinated
  • ISIS --> Opportunistic; decentralized
• Key Goal:
  • AQ --> "Mess with" Westerners in a lethal way
  • ISIS --> Found a sovereign (Suni) Islamic State

There are other differences. Looking just at the differences above, one can see that while neither is "a good thing," the nature of the threat they each pose is very different. Both are, however, ideological movements, so there really are only two strategies for dealing with them:

• Containment -- This strategy accepts that there will be a certain quantity of casualties from AQ/ISIS. This approach forces leaders to make a normative decision about how many deaths are "okay," and it makes the matter of AQ/ISIS terrorism/attacks become one of politics and bickering....."They want to handle it this way and they are wrong. I say we should handle it that way and I'm right." Containment is basically a non-solution to the problem (unless one sees the problem as the need for a rhetorical/political wedge) that lets one "dance around" the real issue for as long as voters will suffer one's doing so. Make no mistake; a "wedge" that involves armed conflict and the industries that supply such things is a powerful "wedge" in many ways.
• Extermination -- This strategy aims to kill or convert every person who might possibly share any material portion of AQ/ISIS' ideology. This approach isn't quick either way, and the armed tack will surely piss of as many people as it kills. Thus the physical approach risks creating a new enemy that merely has a different ideological basis for being pissed off. The intellectual/moral approach takes years and years to produce real results. Also, as goes the AQ/ISIS issue, requires one to admit one's own prior failings before one can be taken seriously when delivering a new message that professes one's new stance(s) that are neither selfish nor arrogant nor maliciously intended. The problem with this is voters; they generally aren't patient. Thus one also has to get voters to take a long view toward a moral solution's efficacy and effectiveness.

 

[TNHarley]

Because they changed their name to ISIS in 2006.. Lol

What were thy called before that?

Al Qaeda in Iraq

Sorry buster you couldn't be farther from reality. There are two completely separate organizations. Was Al Queda in Iraq a factor before Bush invaded?

Dude you are retarded. It is common knowledge that they changed the name after Zarqawi died.

ISIS and Al Qaeda really aren't the same things. ISIS is an offshoot of Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), but AQI divested itself of it's ISIS "wing." Furthermore, the threat ISIS poses to the U.S. and others is different from that of Al Qaeda (AQ).

• Targets:
  • AQ --> Focused almost exclusively on attacking the U.S. and its allies in Europe and on attacking Israel.
  • ISIS --> Attacks anybody anywhere. As much concerned with destroying Shiites as with Westerners.
• Strategy:
  • AQ --> Deliberate, centrally coordinated
  • ISIS --> Opportunistic; decentralized
• Key Goal:
  • AQ --> "Mess with" Westerners in a lethal way
  • ISIS --> Found a sovereign (Suni) Islamic State

There are other differences. Looking just at the differences above, one can see that while neither is "a good thing," the nature of the threat they each pose is very different. Both are, however, ideological movements, so there really are only two strategies for dealing with them:

• Containment -- This strategy accepts that there will be a certain quantity of casualties from AQ/ISIS. This approach forces leaders to make a normative decision about how many deaths are "okay," and it makes the matter of AQ/ISIS terrorism/attacks become one of politics and bickering....."They want to handle it this way and they are wrong. I say we should handle it that way and I'm right." Containment is basically a non-solution to the problem (unless one sees the problem as the need for a rhetorical/political wedge) that lets one "dance around" the real issue for as long as voters will suffer one's doing so. Make no mistake; a "wedge" that involves armed conflict and the industries that supply such things is a powerful "wedge" in many ways.
• Extermination -- This strategy aims to kill or convert every person who might possibly share any material portion of AQ/ISIS' ideology. This approach isn't quick either way, and the armed tack will surely piss of as many people as it kills. Thus the physical approach risks creating a new enemy that merely has a different ideological basis for being pissed off. The intellectual/moral approach takes years and years to produce real results. Also, as goes the AQ/ISIS issue, requires one to admit one's own prior failings before one can be taken seriously when delivering a new message that professes one's new stance(s) that are neither selfish nor arrogant nor maliciously intended. The problem with this is voters; they generally aren't patient. Thus one also has to get voters to take a long view toward a moral solution's efficacy and effectiveness.

Here is a great link that explains everything.
The Islamic State | Mapping Militant Organizations

 

[nat4900]

... and, guess what? ...

... it's ...

... wait for it ...

... Obama's plan!

Pentagon prepares to give the White House a stepped-up battle plan against Islamic State

Hahahahahahahahahaha ...

... what a bunch of rubes.

Pretty much what will ALSO happen with the A.C.A.....change the name and take the "credit"......LOL

 

[12icer]

Trumps plan is not to tell any treasonous liberal scum what he is going to do, That is the BEST strategy I have heard in many years, The next people out of the loop are all of the dimshitocrats. Gonna be funny when the dimshitscum on the armed services comittees don't know what the hell is going on, the liberal lying press don't know what is going on, and you liberal mouthpiece talking points vomit factories have no idea what vomit you are supposed to spout. All you will be saying is "Trump needs to be impeached because he wont tell us what he is doing and we cant find anything to lie about or anything to tell our country's enemies to kill our soldiers"!!!

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

if this strategy was developed during the Obama administration you have to ask yourself why it wasn't implemented ?

It was ...

... and, it has been so successful, Trump is gonna try to take credit for it.

Really ? They are still chopping off heads, the Battle for Mosul has been going on since last October, and all of this against the "JV" team.

I was on a JV football team once. A year later we went to the State Finals.

Great did you prostitute your opponents wives and daughters maybe chop off some heads. Exicute those on your side who didn't cheer enough ?

 

[depotoo]

You're right, it's not.

No no that can't be right Candidate Trumph said he was smarter that all the Generals. So I expect him to disregard their plan and finally reveal his much superior plan. You know, bomb the shit out of them and all.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

... and, guess what? ...

... it's ...

... wait for it ...

... Obama's plan!

Pentagon prepares to give the White House a stepped-up battle plan against Islamic State

Hahahahahahahahahaha ...

... what a bunch of rubes.

Looks like the PENTAGON'S plan.

Obama's plan was to cheer from the sidelines as ISIS stole military assets & marched them in a convoy across an empty desert in Iraq on their way back to Syria

Why not tell us just what trumps plan is? We have been waiting since he told us he had one ready to go

You Dumbfucks just don't get it.

You don't reveal your strategy to your enemies

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

... and, guess what? ...

... it's ...

... wait for it ...

... Obama's plan!

Pentagon prepares to give the White House a stepped-up battle plan against Islamic State

Hahahahahahahahahaha ...

... what a bunch of rubes.

The job of the Brass is to formulate battle plans that win wars, if this strategy was developed during the Obama administration you have to ask yourself why it wasn't implemented ? Funny right ?

What wars did Bush win?
What wars did Obama lose?

We are sending troops back to Iraq because of Obama.

 

[The Original Tree]

I heard he is going to drop the Dem Secret Uber Weapon on them.

The DNC SuperBomb. THE DNC SERVER that contains a weapon so powerful that if unleashed it could kill ISIS in one swoop, impeach a president, and put Hillary Clinton in The Oval Office.

A Weapon of Mass Destruction So Dreadful and Awesome, that no one dare pull the Trigger on The ULTIMATE DOOMSDAY WEAPON!

At least show us a picture of THE DNC server and evidence of Russian Hacking?

Why is it such a Secret?

Will it Melt Our Faces Off if we look at it?

 

[BlindBoo]

if this strategy was developed during the Obama administration you have to ask yourself why it wasn't implemented ?

It was ...

... and, it has been so successful, Trump is gonna try to take credit for it.

Really ? They are still chopping off heads, the Battle for Mosul has been going on since last October, and all of this against the "JV" team.

I was on a JV football team once. A year later we went to the State Finals.

Great did you prostitute your opponents wives and daughters maybe chop off some heads. Exicute those on your side who didn't cheer enough ?

Ummm no, it was a High School team. Everybody says stupid things. Things change over time. Football teams get better. Murderous terrors get better at murdering and terrorizing. Presidents get better. Time to move on.

 

[bendog]

... and, guess what? ...

... it's ...

... wait for it ...

... Obama's plan!

Pentagon prepares to give the White House a stepped-up battle plan against Islamic State

Hahahahahahahahahaha ...

... what a bunch of rubes.

Well, I think you have to give Trump some credit for listening to the generals and more or less staying the course. Trump has a tendency to go off half cocked shooting from the hip. And the MSM has gotten in trouble by reporting the halfcocked tweets are actual policy.

But would Obama have gone for this.

But then you're back to the "fact" that ISIS is not an existential threat to the US, while Russia is.

 

[nat4900]

You don't reveal your strategy to your enemies

True, I am POSITIVE that those murderous ISIS thugs are really wondering what the U.S. thinks about them.

 

[The Original Tree]

You don't reveal your strategy to your enemies

True, I am POSITIVE that those murderous ISIS thugs are really wondering what the U.S. thinks about them.

They already know. Obama thinks they are THE JV TEAM.

 

[nat4900]

They already know. Obama thinks they are THE JV TEAM.

Lame, very LAME..If that's all you morons have to 'bash Obama" to make you feel better, a laxative may help you more.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

You don't reveal your strategy to your enemies

True, I am POSITIVE that those murderous ISIS thugs are really wondering what the U.S. thinks about them.

and yet again, answering a point you wish was made as opposed to the one being made.

 

[BlindBoo]

... and, guess what? ...

... it's ...

... wait for it ...

... Obama's plan!

Pentagon prepares to give the White House a stepped-up battle plan against Islamic State

Hahahahahahahahahaha ...

... what a bunch of rubes.

The job of the Brass is to formulate battle plans that win wars, if this strategy was developed during the Obama administration you have to ask yourself why it wasn't implemented ? Funny right ?

What wars did Bush win?
What wars did Obama lose?

We are sending troops back to Iraq because of Obama.

Pretty simplistic isn't it? Didn't President Bush fail to get a provision in the SOFA with Iraq that would allow for a stabilizing force to remain in Iraq. He had a full year before the UN pulled the plug on the Occupation Mandate, to negotiate something more than what amounted to a time table for US withdrawal from Iraq. Does the administration that carried out the invasion and occupation have no ongoing responsibility in the region?

 

[Reasonable]

Obama already had Isis on the run and the Iraqis had made significant gains in taking back many of their territories.

But when you listen to the pathological liar he'll never tell you that.