President Obama is keeping us safe

[elvis]

What an idiotic statement.

How is my statement idiotic?

Bush only protected America untill Sept 10th of his first term.

Today is Sept 17th

Obama has kept us safe a week longer than Bush did.

This is a FACT

It took years to plan the 9/11 attacks.

This is a FACT.

Obama is riding the coat tails of the Bush administration and giving a false sense that he is protecting this nation. Taking full credit of course, so nice try crackhead ..........

Try telling him that six million Jews being murdered by the Nazis is a FACT. His turban is on a little too tight.

 

[KittenKoder]

Okay, so it's still:

If something goes wrong, it's Bush's fault, even if Obama is upholding his policies.

If something goes right, Obama gets credit, even if he's just upholding Bush's policies.

That's all I am seeing from his borg.

 

[DiveCon]

Bush's policies made people want to attack us.

Obama is getting rid of Bush's insane policies and replacing them with common sense policies.

We will all be able tto sleep safely at night because of Obama.

um, did you not read the OP, they STILL want to attack us

MORON

 

[DiveCon]

Okay, so it's still:

If something goes wrong, it's Bush's fault, even if Obama is upholding his policies.

If something goes right, Obama gets credit, even if he's just upholding Bush's policies.

That's all I am seeing from his borg.

you got it

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I was under the impression that you thought that his anti-terrorist policies had been effective thus far. Are you disputing that, or would you like to see more done. Is the John Adams project related to this (no idea what it is) subject? CIA investigations....I don't think I've heard about that either. Where did you first watch or read this story? Is there a link? Fox, CNN, Washington Post? I'm not trying to trap you with the right vs. left media. I would just like to read or hear the same, so that I can draw my own conclusions, compare medias, etc...

His anti-terrorist policies is an extension of Bush' policies and so far have been effective. However more could be done. Do youthink Bush would allow The jjohn Adams project to to continue doing what they're doing? Do you think Bush would allow his attorney general to investigate CIA agents, that have already been investigated?

If you haven't heard about these news items I suggest you stop watching the so-called mainstream media.

The John Adams Project, affiliated with the ACLU, is secretly photographing CIA agents and showing the pictures to suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, among others. Activist lawyers Joshua Dratel, Edward MacMahon and Nina Ginsberg are just three members of the Adams group who are putting CIA agents in grave danger.

Attorney General Eric Holder named veteran federal prosecutorJohn Durham to investigate CIA terror interrogations, while not heeding warnings from President Obama to avoid becoming mired in past controversies.

I'm sure if you put forth some effort you could find many links to these stories. I just don't have the time nor the will to educate you on current events.

Oh, this is so precious I just couldn't hold myself from reacting on it. Lonestar, you're notorious for not substantiating your claims. That's just something you do. Haha, you've been on this board since May this year and you already have almost 1500 posts yet 'you just don't have the time' ...

You a funny guy, aren't ya

Now pay attention, I know it's difficult for you to understand I also know that reading comprehension is your enemy, but bear with me.

This was posed to me.

"Is the John Adams project related to this (no idea what it is) subject? CIA investigations....I don't think I've heard about that either"

I answered. "The John Adams Project, affiliated with the ACLU, is secretly photographing CIA agents and showing the pictures to suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, among others. Activist lawyers Joshua Dratel, Edward MacMahon and Nina Ginsberg are just three members of the Adams group who are putting CIA agents in grave danger.

Attorney General Eric Holder named veteran federal prosecutorJohn Durham to investigate CIA terror interrogations, while not heeding warnings from President Obama to avoid becoming mired in past controversies."

Then I added, "I just don't have the time nor the will to educate you on current events" even though I did give a brief summary of the questions posed. So I did in fact "substantiate" my claims.

You see, it's not that I don't have time as you suggest, I just that I don't have the time to keep you idiots up to date on current events. There are somethings you should do for yourself, now if you need me to tell you of the daily happenings then I will gladly oblige you for a small fee.

 

[namvet]

obama has kept us safer further into his presidency than bush did.

fail

 

[Intense]

What exactly is The Obama Doctrine? Apologize and Surrender? Elimination of Private Property? How come Government is not ever Greedy? How come Government never Over Reaches?

 

[WillowTree]

Okay, so it's still:

If something goes wrong, it's Bush's fault, even if Obama is upholding his policies.

If something goes right, Obama gets credit, even if he's just upholding Bush's policies.

That's all I am seeing from his borg.

what are you splashing your face with? KoolAid?

 

[namvet]

I thought Osama invited Bin Laden for dinner at the black house

 

[Mr Natural]

obama has kept us safer further into his presidency than bush did.

fail

fact

 

[namvet]

obama has kept us safer further into his presidency than bush did.

fail

fact

fact why did your dickless wonder select Joe Biden???

 

[Intense]

fail

fact

fact why did your dickless wonder select Joe Biden???

I was gonna say that he needed both hands free, then I realized you depicted him as Dickless.

 

[Mr Natural]

fail

fact

fact why did your dickless wonder select Joe Biden???

fact why did your half-wit select Dickhead Cheney???

 

[namvet]

fact

fact why did your dickless wonder select joe biden???

fact why did your half-wit select dickhead cheney???

why did your half-wit select dickhead cheney???

WHERE IS BIDEN????

big time fail !!!!

 

[namvet]

here's mr dickless. no wonder we cant find his BC !!!!!!

 

[Neser Boha]

His anti-terrorist policies is an extension of Bush' policies and so far have been effective. However more could be done. Do youthink Bush would allow The jjohn Adams project to to continue doing what they're doing? Do you think Bush would allow his attorney general to investigate CIA agents, that have already been investigated?

If you haven't heard about these news items I suggest you stop watching the so-called mainstream media.

The John Adams Project, affiliated with the ACLU, is secretly photographing CIA agents and showing the pictures to suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, among others. Activist lawyers Joshua Dratel, Edward MacMahon and Nina Ginsberg are just three members of the Adams group who are putting CIA agents in grave danger.

Attorney General Eric Holder named veteran federal prosecutorJohn Durham to investigate CIA terror interrogations, while not heeding warnings from President Obama to avoid becoming mired in past controversies.

I'm sure if you put forth some effort you could find many links to these stories. I just don't have the time nor the will to educate you on current events.

Oh, this is so precious I just couldn't hold myself from reacting on it. Lonestar, you're notorious for not substantiating your claims. That's just something you do. Haha, you've been on this board since May this year and you already have almost 1500 posts yet 'you just don't have the time' ...

You a funny guy, aren't ya

Now pay attention, I know it's difficult for you to understand I also know that reading comprehension is your enemy, but bear with me.

This was posed to me.

"Is the John Adams project related to this (no idea what it is) subject? CIA investigations....I don't think I've heard about that either"

I answered. "The John Adams Project, affiliated with the ACLU, is secretly photographing CIA agents and showing the pictures to suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, among others. Activist lawyers Joshua Dratel, Edward MacMahon and Nina Ginsberg are just three members of the Adams group who are putting CIA agents in grave danger.

Attorney General Eric Holder named veteran federal prosecutorJohn Durham to investigate CIA terror interrogations, while not heeding warnings from President Obama to avoid becoming mired in past controversies." (THIS IS WHERE A LINK TO A RELIABLE SOURCE SHOULD GO)

Then I added, "I just don't have the time nor the will to educate you on current events" even though I did give a brief summary of the questions posed. So I did in fact "substantiate" my claims. (NO, UNFORTUNATELY, YOU DID NOT DO SO)

You see, it's not that I don't have time as you suggest, I just that I don't have the time to keep you idiots up to date on current events. There are somethings you should do for yourself, now if you need me to tell you of the daily happenings then I will gladly oblige you for a small fee.

This is what a lack of basic college education does to a person - they don't know what 'substantiating one's claims' means. Anyone can make anything up - you can say Obama is the anti-christ - but without providing a link to a reliable (read: scientific, peer-reviewed, etc. depending on what information it is) source that claims so, you might have made this shit up as well. And that is what you're doing above.

Learning and growing every day ... this lesson was provided to you for free

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Oh, this is so precious I just couldn't hold myself from reacting on it. Lonestar, you're notorious for not substantiating your claims. That's just something you do. Haha, you've been on this board since May this year and you already have almost 1500 posts yet 'you just don't have the time' ...

You a funny guy, aren't ya

Now pay attention, I know it's difficult for you to understand I also know that reading comprehension is your enemy, but bear with me.

This was posed to me.

"Is the John Adams project related to this (no idea what it is) subject? CIA investigations....I don't think I've heard about that either"

I answered. "The John Adams Project, affiliated with the ACLU, is secretly photographing CIA agents and showing the pictures to suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, among others. Activist lawyers Joshua Dratel, Edward MacMahon and Nina Ginsberg are just three members of the Adams group who are putting CIA agents in grave danger.

Attorney General Eric Holder named veteran federal prosecutorJohn Durham to investigate CIA terror interrogations, while not heeding warnings from President Obama to avoid becoming mired in past controversies." (THIS IS WHERE A LINK TO A RELIABLE SOURCE SHOULD GO)

Then I added, "I just don't have the time nor the will to educate you on current events" even though I did give a brief summary of the questions posed. So I did in fact "substantiate" my claims. (NO, UNFORTUNATELY, YOU DID NOT DO SO)

You see, it's not that I don't have time as you suggest, I just that I don't have the time to keep you idiots up to date on current events. There are somethings you should do for yourself, now if you need me to tell you of the daily happenings then I will gladly oblige you for a small fee.

This is what a lack of basic college education does to a person - they don't know what 'substantiating one's claims' means. Anyone can make anything up - you can say Obama is the anti-christ - but without providing a link to a reliable (read: scientific, peer-reviewed, etc. depending on what information it is) source that claims so, you might have made this shit up as well. And that is what you're doing above.

Learning and growing every day ... this lesson was provided to you for free

I've given enough information that even a third grader could google it for themselves. Oh but that's right, you liberal idiots needs someone else to do the work.

Trust me, if I post it, it's true. I don't make up shit like you liberal fucks do.

 

[SmarterThanHick]

There's this principle called equality, which dictates that you should not be demanding things from others, without being able to provide them yourself.

If you want to make such immature generalized statements that all liberals continually fabricate information and should be citing their sources, you should take the proactive initiative to step up and do just that yourself.

So no, saying "if I post, it's true" doesn't count. Back what you say, or stop talking (and I'll tell the liberal loons the same thing if they do it too).

 

[Intense]

There's this principle called equality, which dictates that you should not be demanding things from others, without being able to provide them yourself.

If you want to make such immature generalized statements that all liberals continually fabricate information and should be citing their sources, you should take the proactive initiative to step up and do just that yourself.

So no, saying "if I post, it's true" doesn't count. Back what you say, or stop talking (and I'll tell the liberal loons the same thing if they do it too).

We can't All be Equal and Free at the same time. I choose liberty. Feed me a little bit od Equal Non Partial Justice once in a while and I'm Happier than Dick Cheney on Opening Day of Hunting Season. Ask me to carry a baby for 9 months and you are gonna wait a life time. We are not all equal. We are All unique. Different Gifts, different burdens. One size fits all thinking is hurtful. Get past it.

 

[SmarterThanHick]

We can't All be Equal and Free at the same time. I choose liberty. Feed me a little bit od Equal Non Partial Justice once in a while and I'm Happier than Dick Cheney on Opening Day of Hunting Season. Ask me to carry a baby for 9 months and you are gonna wait a life time. We are not all equal. We are All unique. Different Gifts, different burdens. One size fits all thinking is hurtful. Get past it.

Hi there. Welcome to third grade reading, where we learn to actually understand what a person is saying before going off on an unrelated tangent that has nothing to do with what was said.

No where did I mention all people are inherently equal (cuz based on your response, that's apparent). I know, it's hard for a hick to get past catchwords and not instantly associate them with greater political concepts, but let's take a closer look at the concept here. I was instructing that other hick that he cannot demand citation of source from everyone else yet not be expected to provide any himself. This is known as equality, not of human rights, nor with respect to civil liberties or freedoms, nor in relation to Obama, but rather equality of debate standards, avoiding hypocrisy, and holding oneself accountable to truth in the same manner as you expect others to do so.

Let me know if you have any questions. If you would instead like to ignore this little lesson and return to picking out single words from posts to flipout about, I offer you the following: socialism. Good day.