Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
Well what kind of weapons do you thing they had Rob..."this may tickle a little" weapons or perhaps "Could leave you with a nasty welt" weapons?
That is the whole point of this thread. People are judging him by his support for bans and are buying firearms in record numbers.
Once again, it's not an NRA smear that is propelling Americans to gunshops nationwide...it's President Obama's record.
If you don't judge a man on his record, what do you use?
I
You can judge most men on their record. However, I would judge Obama on what he does in office like you would any other President. If people had judged Bush on simply being a Republican then they wouldn't of probably thought he'd support the bailout but he did.
You have to admit however that the NRA committed several smears against Obama in their pamplets. Another thing, this thread is judging Obama on yesterday, not today.
And really, going to play the same semantics I heard in the other thread? Want me to be more specific? They didn't have freakin AK-47s back then. So you cannot say the opinions of the founding fathers on such weapons. The 2nd Amendment says you have a right to bear arms, not AK-47s, M-4s, or RPGs.
The second amendment doesn't say anything about handguns, either. Using your argument, Obama could take away handgus just as easily as AK47s.
Actually, noticed I edited that before you posted that. I felt that was wrong to say for the exact reason you stated.