- Thread starter
- #81
George Soros wasn't op researched by the republicans in 2008? Grow the fuck up. Do you study the history of American Politics or do you just write bs posts on a forum?
Nope.....that's your job.
I'm not as cynical as you are.
And this has nothing to do with growing up.
You get the kind of government you deserve. If you accept this then you deserve the reaming they'll eventually be administering to you on a personal level. Then whining about it won't help because it'll be too late.
Get a clue:
"Digging up dirt and highlighting unflattering aspects of the oppositions life have a long political history. In the 1828 presidential election, Andrew Jacksons opponents unearthed his marriage records, seeking to imply that the hero of the Battle of New Orleans was an adulterer for marrying Rachel Robards in 1791 before she was legally divorced from her first husband. Jackson won the White House over President John Quincy Adams anyway, avenging a bitter loss four years earlier. But the opposition researchers work may have taken a toll: Rachel died shortly before Jackson took officea result, he contended, of the stress of having her honor called into question."
Digging for Dirt - Politics & Personalities - Washingtonian
P.S. Karma doesn't exist.
Yes it does.
Soros is about as rotten as they come. He has a criminal record and he has a very public record......much different from a private citizen. Nobody is trying to prevent Soros from donating to Obama. But what they are doing is exposing his ties with Media Matters, Center For American Progress, and his Open Society operation. He's not simply some guy that gave a few bucks to Obama. He's actively participating in bringing down our system of government, which means he is an enemy of the state.