"Pregnant Jehovah's Witness and her baby die..."

Delta4Embassy

Gold Member
Dec 12, 2013
25,744
3,043
280
Earth
Pregnant Jehovah s Witness dies after refusing blood transfusion for Leukemia Daily Mail Online

"Pregnant Jehovah's Witness and her baby die after she refused a blood transfusion, chemotherapy and a C-section due to her religious beliefs

* Jehovah's Witness and her baby have died after refusing blood transfusion
* The 28-year-old suffered from leukemia but refused treatment due to beliefs
* Over 80 per cent of treated pregnant leukemia sufferers go into remission
* Doctors and staff have described the distressing scene after the baby died and then the woman suffered a fatal stroke and multi-organ failure"

rest at link
 
Pregnant Jehovah s Witness dies after refusing blood transfusion for Leukemia Daily Mail Online

"Pregnant Jehovah's Witness and her baby die after she refused a blood transfusion, chemotherapy and a C-section due to her religious beliefs

* Jehovah's Witness and her baby have died after refusing blood transfusion
* The 28-year-old suffered from leukemia but refused treatment due to beliefs
* Over 80 per cent of treated pregnant leukemia sufferers go into remission
* Doctors and staff have described the distressing scene after the baby died and then the woman suffered a fatal stroke and multi-organ failure"

rest at link


Gods kingdom is the real life, standing up for God' command--abstain from blood is a wise decision. Not one mortal on earth can prove--blood transfusions weren't included in that statement.
She applied this ultra important teaching from Jesus---Matt 6:33--therefore, keep on seeking first the kingdom and his( Jehovah) righteousness, and all these other things will be added.
So when she and her baby are granted life everlasting in Gods kingdom, the majority who are never even taught that important truth from Jesus will not even see it occur.
 
Sadly, the thumpers will see this as a reinforcement of their ignorance.

IMO, if adults want to refuse medical treatment, that's their business but I disagree that they should be allowed to deny the same to underage children.
 
Sadly, the thumpers will see this as a reinforcement of their ignorance.

IMO, if adults want to refuse medical treatment, that's their business but I disagree that they should be allowed to deny the same to underage children.

Pretty sure we've already arrested some pregnant women for doing things known to be harmful to their unborn babies. Seems a double-standard where we then allow them to refuse medical treatment because of some religious delusion.
 
Sadly, the thumpers will see this as a reinforcement of their ignorance.

IMO, if adults want to refuse medical treatment, that's their business but I disagree that they should be allowed to deny the same to underage children.

Pretty sure we've already arrested some pregnant women for doing things known to be harmful to their unborn babies. Seems a double-standard where we then allow them to refuse medical treatment because of some religious delusion.


You cant say its a delusion---Abstain from blood--is all it says--you or any other mortal cannot prove it doesn't include transfusions. One who knows little in comparison to Gods anointed teachers can however reason falsly on many matters.
 
Sadly, the thumpers will see this as a reinforcement of their ignorance.

IMO, if adults want to refuse medical treatment, that's their business but I disagree that they should be allowed to deny the same to underage children.

Pretty sure we've already arrested some pregnant women for doing things known to be harmful to their unborn babies. Seems a double-standard where we then allow them to refuse medical treatment because of some religious delusion.
Kind of wish we'd be entirely consistent here...
 

Forum List

Back
Top