Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And everyone who disagrees with you is somehow a ‘leftist’
You use labels from the 1970s
lol
Durham like Mueller is milking a tax payer funded paycheck. M I L k I N GCertainly he's drilling up to the source of the attempt to interfere with our elections. And we all know pretty much who orchestrated this phony Russia Russia Russia scandal. BY FAR -- the biggest political scandal of our lives.
And you never even apologized for the 5 YEARS of hell your minions of morons put this country thru.
Yawnnnn, I have seen that many times it is IRRELEVANT since Mueller didn't post a Prosecution charge over it.Mueller: A president can be charged with obstruction of justice after leaving office
Robert Mueller did not make a recommendation for or against obstruction charges for Trump, and instead discussed the Justice Department policy.www.usatoday.com
Durham like Mueller is milking a tax payer funded paycheck. M I L k I N G
Day late for what?? There is no reason either of these “investigations” should take as long as they do. No reasonYou are a day late pal since a breakthrough has happened:
Former FBI Attorney Just Blew Up Sussmann Defense in Durham Russia Collusion Case
and,
2016 Clinton Campaign Manager Testifies Hillary Directed Campaign to Push Fraudulent Russian Bank and Trump Story to Media
Day late for what?? There is no reason either of these “investigations” should take as long as they do. No reason
Ok so what are you bitching about?LOL
You said nothing you have NOTHING.
Just another 3-4 explosive weeks. LOLOLLOLSomebody's worried
Ok so what are you bitching about?
Durham like Mueller is milking a tax payer funded paycheck. M I L k I N G
Durham can have a fine case, that doesn’t mean it should take two years to put together. Somebody can still be milking a good case the two concepts are not relatedBecause you made this stupid statement:
It is false since Durhan actually has a good prosecutable case which you are obviously ignoring.
there are plenty of things to bash russia for, but not sure why we should bash them for clinton and the dnc corruption.Durham looks like a fool.
Quote: [ Elias called Trump a "bully" and excoriated Trump's reaction to the Russian hacks and leaks of Democratic National Committee emails, which rocked the party convention in July 2016 by driving a wedge between supporters of Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders at a pivotal moment.
"There was clearly an attempt by Russia to ruin the one clean shot that candidates get to talk to the American public," Elias said, adding that he believed the campaign was under attack. "And instead of doing what any decent human being would do, and condemn it, Donald Trump said, 'I hope Russia is listening and will find the 30,000 Hillary Clinton emails ... and release them.'"] endquote
— Michael Flynn’s and Michael Cohen’s experiences should have informed Durham. Hold your nose and stand back when Trump’s shit hits the fan
This guy is looking more and more like a third rate ambulance chaser
Marc Elias, Hillary Clinton campaign's top lawyer, turns tables on Durham to air Democratic grievances about 2016 election | CNN Politics
Special counsel John Durham has used his first trial as a vehicle to air some of the Hillary Clinton campaign's dirty laundry, but that was derailed Wednesday when the campaign's top lawyer, Marc Elias, promptly used his testimony to slam Donald Trump and the FBI for how they responded to...www.cnn.com
Durham can have a fine case, that doesn’t mean it should take two years to put together. Somebody can still be milking a good case the two concepts are not related
I haven’t said a word about the content of the case. I’ll let that all get sorted out in court. My point is about the time and expense that he and mueller took to conducted their investigations. Milking the teet of the taxpayer. No doubtYou have no idea if this is relevant, and you have ignored my two links so far especially the second one where Bitch Clinton was implicated by her own Campaign manager for the big leak, he says SHE authorized.
"MSM – Hillary Clinton personally approved leaking to the media information alleging a connection between Donald Trump and a Russian bank in 2016, which the campaign itself had not fully confirmed, according to testimony Friday by Clinton’s campaign manager."
I haven’t said a word about the content of the case. I’ll let that all get sorted out in court. My point is about the time and expense that he and mueller took to conducted their investigations. Milking the teet of the taxpayer. No doubt
and Congress, lead by Adam Shifty investigated and found no obstruction, hence why he had to rely on parody to impeach himMueller: A president can be charged with obstruction of justice after leaving office
Robert Mueller did not make a recommendation for or against obstruction charges for Trump, and instead discussed the Justice Department policy.www.usatoday.com
If I recall, you posted that magaturd sham report from Barr, no?It appears you are the latest leftist liar who joins the forum who as usual for liars will not post the evidence to back it up.
I posted what Mueller actually stated from his own report showing that he didn't find prosecutable evidence of a Russian election interference with the Trump team and that he didn't post any Prosecution decisions for the AG to follow on, yup ZERO prosecution decisions in the report.
I read the relevant parts of the bloated report it is clear YOU never did.
If I recall, you posted that magaturd sham report from Barr, no?
Bart didn’t write a report, he wrote a brief summery of the mueller report.If I recall, you posted that magaturd sham report from Barr, no?
