Polygamous Montana trio applies for wedding license for husband and his two "wives"

[Pop23]

This decision didn't reverse anything. All it did was extend legal monogamy to same sex couples.

Then it can be extended further. There's no reason to limit it to two people, you nor anyone else has ever offered a reason.

It was the COURT that decided to give same sex couples equal marriage rights. Why can't you people understand that?

We allowed women to vote,and then we lowered the voting age to 18. That hasn't ended up with 10 year olds voting.

Apples and oranges. Age has to do with competency.

 

[rightwinger]

Seems odd

Polygamy is practiced primarily by Mormons in this country
Mormons helped lead the political fight against Same Sex Marriage (See Prop 8)

Yet, Homosexuals are now being blamed for polygamy

 

[Pop23]

Seems odd

Polygamy is practiced primarily by Mormons in this country
Mormons helped lead the political fight against Same Sex Marriage (See Prop 8)

Yet, Homosexuals are now being blamed for polygamy

Idiot, they HAD NO CASE, until the USSC opened that door. Now there is now reasonable legal argument against it.

As stated before after you quoted the ignorant statement by John Stewart, polygamy is more a biologically sound relationship for males than monogamy.

Marriage between 1 man and 1 women kept that in check, now there is no argument.

Congrats SSM advocates, you opened that door and it will not be closed

 

[NYcarbineer]

Seems odd

Polygamy is practiced primarily by Mormons in this country
Mormons helped lead the political fight against Same Sex Marriage (See Prop 8)

Yet, Homosexuals are now being blamed for polygamy

Idiot, they HAD NO CASE, until the USSC opened that door. Now there is now reasonable legal argument against it.

As stated before after you quoted the ignorant statement by John Stewart, polygamy is more a biologically sound relationship for males than monogamy.

Marriage between 1 man and 1 women kept that in check, now there is no argument.

Congrats SSM advocates, you opened that door and it will not be closed

You people are depressingly stupid. If the polygamists claim equal protection, they will claim it against monogamy, not against same sex monogamy.

btw, the polygamists went to Court over this in the 19th century. Are you blaming that on gay marriage too?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Seems odd

Polygamy is practiced primarily by Mormons in this country
Mormons helped lead the political fight against Same Sex Marriage (See Prop 8)

Yet, Homosexuals are now being blamed for polygamy

Yes that's the best irony out of this isn't it?

 

[Iceweasel]

This decision didn't reverse anything. All it did was extend legal monogamy to same sex couples.

Then it can be extended further. There's no reason to limit it to two people, you nor anyone else has ever offered a reason.

It was the COURT that decided to give same sex couples equal marriage rights. Why can't you people understand that?

We allowed women to vote,and then we lowered the voting age to 18. That hasn't ended up with 10 year olds voting.

Yes, it was the COURT. That isn't in question. If two brothers can't marry then your use of the term "equal rights" is purely political. What has any of that got to do with voting rights? You are spinning all over the place to avoid the question. Why can't three people marry? Why are they unequal to two men? You have no answer.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Polygamy has as long a tradition as monogamy. Probably longer. The definition of marriage was changed when polygamy was removed from the definition under certain governments. Polygamy has a religious basis in many cultures.

All those are the arguments polygamists can use. None of them have anything to do with same sex marriage.

 

[Iceweasel]

Seems odd

Polygamy is practiced primarily by Mormons in this country
Mormons helped lead the political fight against Same Sex Marriage (See Prop 8)

Yet, Homosexuals are now being blamed for polygamy

Idiot, they HAD NO CASE, until the USSC opened that door. Now there is now reasonable legal argument against it.

As stated before after you quoted the ignorant statement by John Stewart, polygamy is more a biologically sound relationship for males than monogamy.

Marriage between 1 man and 1 women kept that in check, now there is no argument.

Congrats SSM advocates, you opened that door and it will not be closed

You people are depressingly stupid. If the polygamists claim equal protection, they will claim it against monogamy, not against same sex monogamy.

btw, the polygamists went to Court over this in the 19th century. Are you blaming that on gay marriage too?

Your stupidity isn't my problem, why would that be depressing? Your excuse is "it's against the law". Too dense to understand homosexual marriage was against the law but now isn't. so why not include three people that love each other. Hint: it would require changing the law like gay marriage. There must be a coloring book version online for you.

 

[Pop23]

Seems odd

Polygamy is practiced primarily by Mormons in this country
Mormons helped lead the political fight against Same Sex Marriage (See Prop 8)

Yet, Homosexuals are now being blamed for polygamy

Idiot, they HAD NO CASE, until the USSC opened that door. Now there is now reasonable legal argument against it.

As stated before after you quoted the ignorant statement by John Stewart, polygamy is more a biologically sound relationship for males than monogamy.

Marriage between 1 man and 1 women kept that in check, now there is no argument.

Congrats SSM advocates, you opened that door and it will not be closed

You people are depressingly stupid. If the polygamists claim equal protection, they will claim it against monogamy, not against same sex monogamy.

btw, the polygamists went to Court over this in the 19th century. Are you blaming that on gay marriage too?

Did they win?

Lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

This decision didn't reverse anything. All it did was extend legal monogamy to same sex couples.

Then it can be extended further. There's no reason to limit it to two people, you nor anyone else has ever offered a reason.

It was the COURT that decided to give same sex couples equal marriage rights. Why can't you people understand that?

We allowed women to vote,and then we lowered the voting age to 18. That hasn't ended up with 10 year olds voting.

Yes, it was the COURT. That isn't in question. If two brothers can't marry then your use of the term "equal rights" is purely political. What has any of that got to do with voting rights? You are spinning all over the place to avoid the question. Why can't three people marry? Why are they unequal to two men? You have no answer.

Have 2 brothers challenged the ban on their marrying? Has that been to the Court?

Three does not equal two, to answer your other stupid question.

 

[Iceweasel]

Polygamy has as long a tradition as monogamy. Probably longer. The definition of marriage was changed when polygamy was removed from the definition under certain governments. Polygamy has a religious basis in many cultures.

All those are the arguments polygamists can use. None of them have anything to do with same sex marriage.

So there's a better basis for polygamy than gay marriage. Obviously there's a reason it's existed since recorded history.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Seems odd

Polygamy is practiced primarily by Mormons in this country
Mormons helped lead the political fight against Same Sex Marriage (See Prop 8)

Yet, Homosexuals are now being blamed for polygamy

Idiot, they HAD NO CASE, until the USSC opened that door. Now there is now reasonable legal argument against it.

As stated before after you quoted the ignorant statement by John Stewart, polygamy is more a biologically sound relationship for males than monogamy.

Marriage between 1 man and 1 women kept that in check, now there is no argument.

Congrats SSM advocates, you opened that door and it will not be closed

You people are depressingly stupid. If the polygamists claim equal protection, they will claim it against monogamy, not against same sex monogamy.

btw, the polygamists went to Court over this in the 19th century. Are you blaming that on gay marriage too?

Your stupidity isn't my problem, why would that be depressing? Your excuse is "it's against the law". Too dense to understand homosexual marriage was against the law but now isn't. so why not include three people that love each other. Hint: it would require changing the law like gay marriage. There must be a coloring book version online for you.

Interracial marriage was against the law. Is that what led to same sex marriage being made legal...legalizing interracial marriage?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Polygamy has as long a tradition as monogamy. Probably longer. The definition of marriage was changed when polygamy was removed from the definition under certain governments. Polygamy has a religious basis in many cultures.

All those are the arguments polygamists can use. None of them have anything to do with same sex marriage.

So there's a better basis for polygamy than gay marriage. Obviously there's a reason it's existed since recorded history.

See you just proved my point. Gay marriage has nothing to do with this.

 

[Pop23]

Polygamy has as long a tradition as monogamy. Probably longer. The definition of marriage was changed when polygamy was removed from the definition under certain governments. Polygamy has a religious basis in many cultures.

All those are the arguments polygamists can use. None of them have anything to do with same sex marriage.

Here's real irony, without the civil war and the confederate battle flag, there would be no 14th amendment, and no gay marriage.

So we ban the flag?

 

[Iceweasel]

This decision didn't reverse anything. All it did was extend legal monogamy to same sex couples.

Then it can be extended further. There's no reason to limit it to two people, you nor anyone else has ever offered a reason.

It was the COURT that decided to give same sex couples equal marriage rights. Why can't you people understand that?

We allowed women to vote,and then we lowered the voting age to 18. That hasn't ended up with 10 year olds voting.

Yes, it was the COURT. That isn't in question. If two brothers can't marry then your use of the term "equal rights" is purely political. What has any of that got to do with voting rights? You are spinning all over the place to avoid the question. Why can't three people marry? Why are they unequal to two men? You have no answer.

Have 2 brothers challenged the ban on their marrying? Has that been to the Court?

Three does not equal two, to answer your other stupid question.

Two men don't equal a man and a woman since they will never produce offspring. Which is presumably even how you got here. So you are against brothers because it isn't recognized by the state? LOL.

 

[007]

i hope that someday soon, men will be allowed to marry/purchase a russian bride for about $42.95 on line, and then the brides will be shipped to their homes here via UPS.

Ya think maybe I could get a bundle deal on like 10 of them, and then sell them locally at a mark up?

Course I'd pick out a few of the extra pretty ones and marry them myself.

Because a man having more than one wife is a hellova lot more normal and ethical than the same sex. Same sex is just sick, perverted, disgusting and against nature.

 

[Iceweasel]

Polygamy has as long a tradition as monogamy. Probably longer. The definition of marriage was changed when polygamy was removed from the definition under certain governments. Polygamy has a religious basis in many cultures.

All those are the arguments polygamists can use. None of them have anything to do with same sex marriage.

So there's a better basis for polygamy than gay marriage. Obviously there's a reason it's existed since recorded history.

See you just proved my point. Gay marriage has nothing to do with this.

Your argument is that polygamy isn't gay marriage. Duh. I wonder why that's why there are different words? You have no answer besides sticking your head in the sand.

 

[Pop23]

Seems odd

Polygamy is practiced primarily by Mormons in this country
Mormons helped lead the political fight against Same Sex Marriage (See Prop 8)

Yet, Homosexuals are now being blamed for polygamy

Idiot, they HAD NO CASE, until the USSC opened that door. Now there is now reasonable legal argument against it.

As stated before after you quoted the ignorant statement by John Stewart, polygamy is more a biologically sound relationship for males than monogamy.

Marriage between 1 man and 1 women kept that in check, now there is no argument.

Congrats SSM advocates, you opened that door and it will not be closed

You people are depressingly stupid. If the polygamists claim equal protection, they will claim it against monogamy, not against same sex monogamy.

btw, the polygamists went to Court over this in the 19th century. Are you blaming that on gay marriage too?

Your stupidity isn't my problem, why would that be depressing? Your excuse is "it's against the law". Too dense to understand homosexual marriage was against the law but now isn't. so why not include three people that love each other. Hint: it would require changing the law like gay marriage. There must be a coloring book version online for you.

Interracial marriage was against the law. Is that what led to same sex marriage being made legal...legalizing interracial marriage?

No, black males function sexually the same with white females as they do with black females. As would gay men have with straight women for ever.

 

[007]

Polygamy has as long a tradition as monogamy. Probably longer. The definition of marriage was changed when polygamy was removed from the definition under certain governments. Polygamy has a religious basis in many cultures.

All those are the arguments polygamists can use. None of them have anything to do with same sex marriage.

Here's real irony, without the civil war and the confederate battle flag, there would be no 14th amendment, and no gay marriage.

So we ban the flag?

What's even more ironic, or hypocritical, or two faced, or double standard, whatever, is that we have disturbed progtards in here that support sexual perversion marriage, yet when the heteros want 2 or 3 wives, somehow THAT'S WRONG.

Unbelievable.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Why not?

As long as we are pretending "marriage" means something other than what it means, why not extend it further?

Once you throw out the actual definition, you have no standards by which to define it. What excuse can you come up with to stop at any particular point?

Actually, though rare, a few more societies in history have defined "marriage" as between a man and multiple wives, than have defined it as between two men or two women.

And remember, it only takes one state (or locality) to allow polygamous marriage, then the 14th amendment kicks in and all states must allow it, according to the Supreme Court.

The race to the bottom has started.

------------------------------------------------

Polygamous Montana trio applies for wedding license - Yahoo News

Polygamous Montana trio applies for wedding license

Associated Press
By MATT VOLZ
47 minutes ago

HELENA, Mont. (AP) — A Montana man has applied for a marriage license so he can legally wed his second wife.

Nathan Collier of Billings said Wednesday that last week's U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage inspired him to try to force the acceptance of polygamous marriages.

He says he'll sue the state if his application is rejected.

Collier says Yellowstone County Courthouse officials initially denied the application Tuesday. When he told officials he planned to sue, they said they would consult with the county attorney before giving him a final answer.

That's actually a polyganous marriage, note the 'N.'