Polygamous Montana trio applies for wedding license for husband and his two "wives"

[Pop23]

Why would he think gay marriage has anything to do with him and his women?

Are you really going to play deaf, dumb and stupid? The issue has been discussed in this forum for years. Every argument used to justify so-called "gay marriage" can also be used to justify polygamy.

and? nobody is forcing you to gave two wives or be gay married. of course why anyone would want to with you is beyond me.

That's the kind of low-brow argument I expect from your ilk. Are you saying you support polygamy? You queers can't seem to make up your mind as to whether you support polygamy or whether the recent ruling on gay marriage won't have any affect on it.

Now that unloading your load into a rectum is of equal legal value as hetro intercourse (which creates life), anything is possible.

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Was that the sound of you unloading in a rectum?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Are you aware that polygamous marriage can be made legal at the state level?

And recognized elsewhere? Nope. But the Supremes are now deciding state law. Polygamy will make it to them and it will be interesting what argument they can use against it.

The Courts have always decided state law when state laws have been challenged.

That wasn't the question.

You didn't ask a question, dumbass. You made a claim about the SCOTUS deciding state law as if it were some brand new phenomenon. It isn't.

 

[SillyWabbit]

Wait, does this mean I can marry my car and claim it as a dependent?

This decision didn't reverse anything. All it did was extend legal monogamy to same sex couples.

Then it can be extended further. There's no reason to limit it to two people, you nor anyone else has ever offered a reason.

It was the COURT that decided to give same sex couples equal marriage rights. Why can't you people understand that?

We allowed women to vote,and then we lowered the voting age to 18. That hasn't ended up with 10 year olds voting.

Are you sure about that? Plenty of politicians get re-elected for no reason other than name recognition. Sounds like kids voting to me.

 

[SillyWabbit]

For centuries, polygamy has been a heterosexual practice. How does homosexual marriage lead to polygamy?

The number 2 no longer is relevent. 2 was the minimum number required to procreate, to insure future generations. No matter how many same sex individuals are in a " group" no future generations are needed.

2 is no longer relevent.

Name one other contact exclusive to two individuals.

I'll help you out


None

Two remains relevant because Polygamy is against the law.....Homosexual relationships was not against the law

The slippery slope of heterosexual marriages has not led to polygamy despite the fact that polygamous marriages are heterosexual

Arguing tradition is crazy now. There is no reason to fight it.

To paraphrase a Supreme Court Justice

If Tom love Sue and Tom loves Bill, why can Tom Marry Sue but not Marry Bill?

Cause Bill loves Betsy.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Wait, does this mean I can marry my car and claim it as a dependent?

This decision didn't reverse anything. All it did was extend legal monogamy to same sex couples.

Then it can be extended further. There's no reason to limit it to two people, you nor anyone else has ever offered a reason.

It was the COURT that decided to give same sex couples equal marriage rights. Why can't you people understand that?

We allowed women to vote,and then we lowered the voting age to 18. That hasn't ended up with 10 year olds voting.

Are you sure about that? Plenty of politicians get re-elected for no reason other than name recognition. Sounds like kids voting to me.

That wouldn't be how Obama beat a Clinton to become a two term president.

 

[SillyWabbit]

Seems odd

Polygamy is practiced primarily by Mormons in this country
Mormons helped lead the political fight against Same Sex Marriage (See Prop 8)

Yet, Homosexuals are now being blamed for polygamy

Stop making sense. Nobody likes a smartass.

 

[Plasmaball]

Are you really going to play deaf, dumb and stupid? The issue has been discussed in this forum for years. Every argument used to justify so-called "gay marriage" can also be used to justify polygamy.

and? nobody is forcing you to gave two wives or be gay married. of course why anyone would want to with you is beyond me.

That's the kind of low-brow argument I expect from your ilk. Are you saying you support polygamy? You queers can't seem to make up your mind as to whether you support polygamy or whether the recent ruling on gay marriage won't have any affect on it.

Now that unloading your load into a rectum is of equal legal value as hetro intercourse (which creates life), anything is possible.

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Was that the sound of you unloading in a rectum?

you have issues

 

[Pop23]

and? nobody is forcing you to gave two wives or be gay married. of course why anyone would want to with you is beyond me.

That's the kind of low-brow argument I expect from your ilk. Are you saying you support polygamy? You queers can't seem to make up your mind as to whether you support polygamy or whether the recent ruling on gay marriage won't have any affect on it.

Now that unloading your load into a rectum is of equal legal value as hetro intercourse (which creates life), anything is possible.

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Was that the sound of you unloading in a rectum?

you have issues

NOW THATS FUNNY!

 

[Iceweasel]

Are you aware that polygamous marriage can be made legal at the state level?

And recognized elsewhere? Nope. But the Supremes are now deciding state law. Polygamy will make it to them and it will be interesting what argument they can use against it.

The Courts have always decided state law when state laws have been challenged.

That wasn't the question.

You didn't ask a question, dumbass. You made a claim about the SCOTUS deciding state law as if it were some brand new phenomenon. It isn't.

Yes I did, "And recognized elsewhere?" That's what's called a question. To highlight your stupidity. LOL.

 

[rightwinger]

No question that same sex marriage was a liberal issue

Polygamy is a conservative issue between certain sects of the Mormon church who want it for religious purposes and other religious groups who are violently opposed to it.

For the most part, Liberals don't care

 

[bripat9643]

Why not?

As long as we are pretending "marriage" means something other than what it means, why not extend it further?

Once you throw out the actual definition, you have no standards by which to define it. What excuse can you come up with to stop at any particular point?

Actually, though rare, a few more societies in history have defined "marriage" as between a man and multiple wives, than have defined it as between two men or two women.

And remember, it only takes one state (or locality) to allow polygamous marriage, then the 14th amendment kicks in and all states must allow it, according to the Supreme Court.

The race to the bottom has started.

------------------------------------------------

Polygamous Montana trio applies for wedding license - Yahoo News

Polygamous Montana trio applies for wedding license

Associated Press
By MATT VOLZ
47 minutes ago

HELENA, Mont. (AP) — A Montana man has applied for a marriage license so he can legally wed his second wife.

Nathan Collier of Billings said Wednesday that last week's U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage inspired him to try to force the acceptance of polygamous marriages.

He says he'll sue the state if his application is rejected.

Collier says Yellowstone County Courthouse officials initially denied the application Tuesday. When he told officials he planned to sue, they said they would consult with the county attorney before giving him a final answer.

Why would he think gay marriage has anything to do with him and his women?

Are you really going to play deaf, dumb and stupid? The issue has been discussed in this forum for years. Every argument used to justify so-called "gay marriage" can also be used to justify polygamy.

and? nobody is forcing you to gave two wives or be gay married. of course why anyone would want to with you is beyond me.

That's the kind of low-brow argument I expect from your ilk. Are you saying you support polygamy? You queers can't seem to make up your mind as to whether you support polygamy or whether the recent ruling on gay marriage won't have any affect on it.

ive always been for it, because im not a raging pussy who's feelings are constantly hurt because they cant handle people being adults.
In the end you lost because you are a loser. im sure you are used to it by now.

Unfortunately during their drive to legalize gay marriage all the queers claimed it wouldn't lead to legalizing polygamy or any other kind of non-traditional marriage.

 

[bripat9643]

Why not?

As long as we are pretending "marriage" means something other than what it means, why not extend it further?

Once you throw out the actual definition, you have no standards by which to define it. What excuse can you come up with to stop at any particular point?

Actually, though rare, a few more societies in history have defined "marriage" as between a man and multiple wives, than have defined it as between two men or two women.

And remember, it only takes one state (or locality) to allow polygamous marriage, then the 14th amendment kicks in and all states must allow it, according to the Supreme Court.

The race to the bottom has started.

------------------------------------------------

Polygamous Montana trio applies for wedding license - Yahoo News

Polygamous Montana trio applies for wedding license

Associated Press
By MATT VOLZ
47 minutes ago

HELENA, Mont. (AP) — A Montana man has applied for a marriage license so he can legally wed his second wife.

Nathan Collier of Billings said Wednesday that last week's U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage inspired him to try to force the acceptance of polygamous marriages.

He says he'll sue the state if his application is rejected.

Collier says Yellowstone County Courthouse officials initially denied the application Tuesday. When he told officials he planned to sue, they said they would consult with the county attorney before giving him a final answer.

Why would he think gay marriage has anything to do with him and his women?

Are you really going to play deaf, dumb and stupid? The issue has been discussed in this forum for years. Every argument used to justify so-called "gay marriage" can also be used to justify polygamy.

and? nobody is forcing you to gave two wives or be gay married. of course why anyone would want to with you is beyond me.

That's the kind of low-brow argument I expect from your ilk. Are you saying you support polygamy? You queers can't seem to make up your mind as to whether you support polygamy or whether the recent ruling on gay marriage won't have any affect on it.

ive always been for it, because im not a raging pussy who's feelings are constantly hurt because they cant handle people being adults.
In the end you lost because you are a loser. im sure you are used to it by now.

Society lost, moron.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Why would he think gay marriage has anything to do with him and his women?

Are you really going to play deaf, dumb and stupid? The issue has been discussed in this forum for years. Every argument used to justify so-called "gay marriage" can also be used to justify polygamy.

and? nobody is forcing you to gave two wives or be gay married. of course why anyone would want to with you is beyond me.

That's the kind of low-brow argument I expect from your ilk. Are you saying you support polygamy? You queers can't seem to make up your mind as to whether you support polygamy or whether the recent ruling on gay marriage won't have any affect on it.

ive always been for it, because im not a raging pussy who's feelings are constantly hurt because they cant handle people being adults.
In the end you lost because you are a loser. im sure you are used to it by now.

Unfortunately during their drive to legalize gay marriage all the queers claimed it wouldn't lead to legalizing polygamy or any other kind of non-traditional marriage.

So far they are correct...

 

[bripat9643]

No question that same sex marriage was a liberal issue

Polygamy is a conservative issue between certain sects of the Mormon church who want it for religious purposes and other religious groups who are violently opposed to it.

For the most part, Liberals don't care

IF they don't care about polygamous marriages, then why should any heteros care about gays not having the right to marry?

 

[rightwinger]

No question that same sex marriage was a liberal issue

Polygamy is a conservative issue between certain sects of the Mormon church who want it for religious purposes and other religious groups who are violently opposed to it.

For the most part, Liberals don't care

IF they don't care about polygamous marriages, then why should any heteros care about gays not having the right to marry?

It is obvious, by the degree of butthurt, that conservatives care a great deal about keeping gays from marrying

I don't see many liberals bitching about polygamy...it is a conservative issue

 

[bripat9643]

No question that same sex marriage was a liberal issue

Polygamy is a conservative issue between certain sects of the Mormon church who want it for religious purposes and other religious groups who are violently opposed to it.

For the most part, Liberals don't care

IF they don't care about polygamous marriages, then why should any heteros care about gays not having the right to marry?

It is obvious, by the degree of butthurt, that conservatives care a great deal about keeping gays from marrying

I don't see many liberals bitching about polygamy...it is a conservative issue

Queers provided the legal justification for it, numskull.

Do you ever get the point?

 

[Preacher]

Still waiting on first father/daughter son/mother brother/sister couple to try and get marriage license after all if they are both consenting adults who is to say no!?

 

[NYcarbineer]

No question that same sex marriage was a liberal issue

Polygamy is a conservative issue between certain sects of the Mormon church who want it for religious purposes and other religious groups who are violently opposed to it.

For the most part, Liberals don't care

IF they don't care about polygamous marriages, then why should any heteros care about gays not having the right to marry?

It is obvious, by the degree of butthurt, that conservatives care a great deal about keeping gays from marrying

I don't see many liberals bitching about polygamy...it is a conservative issue

Queers provided the legal justification for it, numskull.

Do you ever get the point?

No they didn't. Opposite sex monogamy was already legal. Polygamists have to prove they qualify for equal treatment under the law -

equal to opposite sex monogamy.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Seems odd

Polygamy is practiced primarily by Mormons in this country
Mormons helped lead the political fight against Same Sex Marriage (See Prop 8)

Yet, Homosexuals are now being blamed for polygamy

Idiot, they HAD NO CASE, until the USSC opened that door. Now there is now reasonable legal argument against it.

As stated before after you quoted the ignorant statement by John Stewart, polygamy is more a biologically sound relationship for males than monogamy.

Marriage between 1 man and 1 women kept that in check, now there is no argument.

Congrats SSM advocates, you opened that door and it will not be closed

You people are depressingly stupid. If the polygamists claim equal protection, they will claim it against monogamy, not against same sex monogamy.

btw, the polygamists went to Court over this in the 19th century. Are you blaming that on gay marriage too?

Your stupidity isn't my problem, why would that be depressing? Your excuse is "it's against the law". Too dense to understand homosexual marriage was against the law but now isn't. so why not include three people that love each other. Hint: it would require changing the law like gay marriage. There must be a coloring book version online for you.

Interracial marriage was against the law. Is that what led to same sex marriage being made legal...legalizing interracial marriage?

No,that's just the excuse lying dumfuck like you use to defend gay marriage.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

lol, I don't have to defend same sex marriage anymore. That war is over.

 

[bripat9643]

No question that same sex marriage was a liberal issue

Polygamy is a conservative issue between certain sects of the Mormon church who want it for religious purposes and other religious groups who are violently opposed to it.

For the most part, Liberals don't care

IF they don't care about polygamous marriages, then why should any heteros care about gays not having the right to marry?

It is obvious, by the degree of butthurt, that conservatives care a great deal about keeping gays from marrying

I don't see many liberals bitching about polygamy...it is a conservative issue

Queers provided the legal justification for it, numskull.

Do you ever get the point?

No they didn't. Opposite sex monogamy was already legal. Polygamists have to prove they qualify for equal treatment under the law -

equal to opposite sex monogamy.

Of course they provided the justification. Queers argued that any consenting adult should be able to marry any other consenting adult. How does polygamy not fit that description?

No one has to prove that they "qualify" for equal treatment under the law. The only question is "what constitutes equal?" The queers proved that anything goes. Issues like reproduction or what's best for society don't enter into it. All that matters is that they love each other. Who says three people can't love each other?