- Banned
- #4,801
Is it fair that I drove old cars for 30 years to be able to have something and pay off my house?
My relative drives 2 brand new cars, a $65,000 one and a $50,000 one. He lives in a $450,000 home with a high mortgage. He has a beach condo worth $400,000 with a large mortgage on it. Their credit cards are maxed out. He and his wife work when they want to and barely get by, mainly by an inheritance.
I drive old cars, one with 299,000 miles on it, paid off my 3BR, 2BA house in 1992. I have NO car payment and no Florida condo. I saved my money for 21 years and have a few hundred grand in the bank and more in stocks.
My relatives' kids qualify for Pell grants for their kids for college because they are deemed more in need than me!
All because they are irresponsible with their money buying high ticket items and a big mortgage and I am not and have money in the bank.
Under the Federal guidelines you are allowed to own a second home and it does not hurt your formula for the means test.
That is the world of means test benefits for the "poor and needy" for at least 40% of the money doled out.
And the liberal claims this system is "fair".
It sounds like you are living a life that you hate.
I've tried to do the opposite. The secret is to spend your time doing what you enjoy accomplishing, learn every day, don't sweat the small stuff. Materialism is absolutely no different than drugs. Addictive, frustrating, a false world, expensive, a cruel, cruel master.
Look at the repressed rage expressed here daily by goods addicts.
Life's too short to spend even a minute in a futile race to nowhere.
No sir, there is no other life I would have lived.
You changed the subject like all liberals do.
I would change your ability and power in supporting government to legally steal my money to give it to you or your friends.
What is a "goods addict"? Who determines what one should have and not have? You? Government?
You only have to pay US taxes if you live here.