Political Rhetoric Complainers: practice what you preace and condem these videos!!!

PLYMCO_PILGRIM

Gold Member
Jul 3, 2009
17,416
3,063
183
America's Home Town
How I wish people could jsut agree to stop using the violent imagery in the political sphere.


It is too much for the right to give up.

I dont understand why they refuse to just not talk violently.

More people are going to have to die first.

Damn I wish there was something that could be done to avoid the next deaths.




More people are going to die bec


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCMDur9CDZ4[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMxZn1wkfms[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBKeB5tyigk&feature=related[/ame]

So do you condem it?
 
Last edited:
41BdR7dnVoL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
 
I condem this violent imagery and ask everyone involved in these words to NEVER again use violent imagery in the political sphere.


Care to join me?
 
LOL, a good time to POST this little goody again.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQ7r5ivupTU&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
 
Yes I agree violent imagery is dumb.

Its also spawns violence.

Which is why it should be condemed
 
where did I say that?

No one is talking about ANY ban.

We are asking you to join us in condeming violent speach in our political sphere.
 
Why wont you guys join me in condeming all the violent imagery??????

Care to comdem the violent imagery on the right?

Yes I agree violent imagery is dumb.

Its also spawns violence.

Which is why it should be condemed


I reject the premise of your idiotic question..... I dont remember anyone on this board condoning violence towards anyone.
:anj_stfu:

Not spesking out is a type of condoning.

many on here just keep defending it by saying it has no impact.
 
How I wish people could jsut agree to stop using the violent imagery in the political sphere.


It is too much for the right to give up.

I dont understand why they refuse to just not talk violently.

More people are going to have to die first.

Damn I wish there was something that could be done to avoid the next deaths.




More people are going to die bec


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCMDur9CDZ4[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMxZn1wkfms[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBKeB5tyigk&feature=related[/ame]

So do you condem it?

Have you condemned Palin's crosshairs map?
 
I condem this violent imagery and ask everyone involved in these words to NEVER again use violent imagery in the political sphere.


Care to join me?

Violent imagery? Give me some examples that you think are violent? Should I condemn these images?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wm6NeM-6vBE[/ame]
 
One of the primary signs of intelligence and rationally is being able to distinguish between things, and that includes talk that correctly assesses the world and the political reality, and speech that only criticizes another because you lost the election and want power back. Same thing happened when Clinton was elected, and I'm sure from what I have read the same thing happened to FDR, Truman, and LBJ. If one can compare this speech to tea party signs, Glenn Beck rants, Angle's second amendment solutions, Palin's reload, carrying guns to meetings, the town hall crazies, or Limbaugh's wish for a president to fail, there is little hope for civility in America.


"We first kill people with our minds, before we kill them with weapons. Whatever the conflict, the enemy is always the destroyer. We're on God's side; they're barbaric. We're good, they're evil. War gives us a feeling of moral clarity that we lack at other times." Sam Keen
 

Forum List

Back
Top