Political Rhetoric Complainers: practice what you preace and condem these videos!!!

How I wish people could jsut agree to stop using the violent imagery in the political sphere.


It is too much for the right to give up.

I dont understand why they refuse to just not talk violently.

More people are going to have to die first.

Damn I wish there was something that could be done to avoid the next deaths.




More people are going to die bec


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCMDur9CDZ4[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMxZn1wkfms[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBKeB5tyigk&feature=related[/ame]

So do you condem it?

Have you condemned Palin's crosshairs map?
I'm not the moonbat here blaming some overheated political rhetoric for the actions of a lone kook.

Your attempt at deflection fails.
 
One of the primary signs of intelligence and rationally is being able to distinguish between things, and that includes talk that correctly assesses the world and the political reality, and speech that only criticizes another because you lost the election and want power back. Same thing happened when Clinton was elected, and I'm sure from what I have read the same thing happened to FDR, Truman, and LBJ. If one can compare this speech to tea party signs, Glenn Beck rants, Angle's second amendment solutions, Palin's reload, carrying guns to meetings, the town hall crazies, or Limbaugh's wish for a president to fail, there is little hope for civility in America.


"We first kill people with our minds, before we kill them with weapons. Whatever the conflict, the enemy is always the destroyer. We're on God's side; they're barbaric. We're good, they're evil. War gives us a feeling of moral clarity that we lack at other times." Sam Keen

I get it, you think everyone should tailor what they say so that stupid and insane people could not possibly misconstrue it, and so that you can understand it without resorting to a dictionary. Political office holder are not elected so that they can talk to stupid people, they are there to make decisions, and explain those decisions to intelligent people. You don't have to worry about Guam tipping over if too many people get on it because we will make sure that the ballast tanks keep it level.
 
How I wish people could jsut agree to stop using the violent imagery in the political sphere.


It is too much for the right to give up.

I dont understand why they refuse to just not talk violently.

More people are going to have to die first.

Damn I wish there was something that could be done to avoid the next deaths.




More people are going to die bec


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCMDur9CDZ4[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMxZn1wkfms[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBKeB5tyigk&feature=related[/ame]

So do you condem it?
I cannot open them, but if they are bad (and I will take your word for it) I would certainly condemn them. Could you possible give a synopsis of what is in them for us youtube challenged?
 
41BdR7dnVoL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

Two minutes between his post and your post. Seriously? :eusa_eh:
 
How I wish people could jsut agree to stop using the violent imagery in the political sphere.


It is too much for the right to give up.

I dont understand why they refuse to just not talk violently.

More people are going to have to die first.

Damn I wish there was something that could be done to avoid the next deaths.




More people are going to die bec


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCMDur9CDZ4[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMxZn1wkfms[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBKeB5tyigk&feature=related[/ame]

So do you condem it?

No, of course I didn't blame the other side either.
I put partial blame on the guy's parents for not trying to make him get help, but I put most of the blame on the guy because he is the one who commited the crime.
 
Of course we condemn it universally.

The complaint we have is that you condemn only on a partisan basis.

You understand we are saying it is just plain wrong, not that it is only wrong when the other guys do it.
 
I think both sides need to realize this kid had no set way of thinking. He had right wing ideas and left wing ideas, and all together just hated the government. He didn't like the congress woman, but he probably hated republican politicians, too. He needed help, and from what I am seeing, showed many warning signs, and no one around him picked up on them, or cared enough to do anything.
I think both sides are making this political, especially talk show hosts, and it is kind of depressing to watch.
 
I think both sides need to realize this kid had no set way of thinking. He had right wing ideas and left wing ideas, and all together just hated the government. He didn't like the congress woman, but he probably hated republican politicians, too. He needed help, and from what I am seeing, showed many warning signs, and no one around him picked up on them, or cared enough to do anything.
I think both sides are making this political, especially talk show hosts, and it is kind of depressing to watch.
The talk show hosts pretty much got thrown into this by an alligator mouthed Sheriff, who decided to toss aside his duty to gather evidence for the prosecution in favor of editorializing and shifting the blame away from the perp.
 
I'm not the moonbat here blaming some overheated political rhetoric for the actions of a lone kook.

Your attempt at deflection fails.

No, you're the moonbat who provided a false equivalency. Your attempt at equivalency fails.
 
Have you condemned Palin's crosshairs map?
I'm not the moonbat here blaming some overheated political rhetoric for the actions of a lone kook.

Your attempt at deflection fails.

No, you're the moonbat who provided a false equivalency. Your attempt at equivalency fails.
I'm drawing no equivalency.

Why do you see the speck in your neighbor's eye, but do not notice the log in your own?
 
I'm not the moonbat here blaming some overheated political rhetoric for the actions of a lone kook.

Your attempt at deflection fails.

No, you're the moonbat who provided a false equivalency. Your attempt at equivalency fails.
I'm drawing no equivalency.

Why do you see the speck in your neighbor's eye, but do not notice the log in your own?

TRUE! I wouldn't find fault with the rhetoric in the videos you provided if Bush said them.

You really need the butler to take you out in the woods to see a log...
 
One of the primary signs of intelligence and rationally is being able to distinguish between things, and that includes talk that correctly assesses the world and the political reality...
By that criteria, you're easily one of the least intelligent posters here.

You're just so smart, see number three: http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-flame-zone/148425-my-new-year-resolutions.html But under these circumstances I forgive your inane attempt at cleverness, you may one day grow up. We can hope can't we.
 
Your "New Year's Resolutions" are an encapsulation of the arrogant, bigoted, elitist fuckface that you are.

Little wonder that you most frequently post the writings and opinions of others, only to add nothing more than "yeah, what he said" and links to books that nobody but you would read.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top