Police corruption UK style

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Jan 20, 2016
47,146
20,451
2,300
Y Cae Ras

Firstly he gets off without any jail time for an assault on a minor.
Secondly, he is allowed to retire with a full pension whilst suspended.

This is the police looking after its own, something that happens in every organisation everywhere in the world. The people who waved through this arrangement should be sacked and then charged with corruption.

Watch the video and imagine if it was your child.
 
"This is the shocking moment a police officer assaulted a young boy with severe autism at a special needs school in Liverpool."

Sounds like the lad needed a special kick in the bum.
 

Firstly he gets off without any jail time for an assault on a minor.
Secondly, he is allowed to retire with a full pension whilst suspended.

This is the police looking after its own, something that happens in every organisation everywhere in the world. The people who waved through this arrangement should be sacked and then charged with corruption.

Watch the video and imagine if it was your child.
Corruption? No, most likely adherence to the UK's semi-socialist worker protection laws. Yup even the bad ones are protected, funny how that works.
 

Firstly he gets off without any jail time for an assault on a minor.
Secondly, he is allowed to retire with a full pension whilst suspended.

This is the police looking after its own, something that happens in every organisation everywhere in the world. The people who waved through this arrangement should be sacked and then charged with corruption.

Watch the video and imagine if it was your child.
Well.How about a blast to the chest with 00 buck ?
 
You mean when they want to access a service that they have paid for ?

It was Sir Robert Peel (an Englishman I believe) who said, in his 9 Peelian Principles ...

  • To recognise always that the power of the police to fulfill their functions and duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour, and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.
  • To recognise always that to secure and maintain the respect and approval of the public means also the securing of the willing co-operation of the public in the task of securing observance of laws.
According to Sir Robert, the basis of modern policing requires A) the police maintain public public respect and, just as important, B) the public must willingly cooperate in the observance of laws.

Just as police malfeasance makes it difficult for the police to maintain the respect of the public, wide-spread public disrespect for police (and the laws they enforce) makes it impossible for police to do their job.

Peel himself said that without police, the only alternative to keeping the peace is military force and harsh judicial penalties (like being transported to Wales).

If you wish for services of the police to continue to be available, the public will have to be less antagonistic to their job.
 
It was Sir Robert Peel (an Englishman I believe) who said, in his 9 Peelian Principles ...

  • To recognise always that the power of the police to fulfill their functions and duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour, and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.
  • To recognise always that to secure and maintain the respect and approval of the public means also the securing of the willing co-operation of the public in the task of securing observance of laws.
According to Sir Robert, the basis of modern policing requires A) the police maintain public public respect and, just as important, B) the public must willingly cooperate in the observance of laws.

Just as police malfeasance makes it difficult for the police to maintain the respect of the public, wide-spread public disrespect for police (and the laws they enforce) makes it impossible for police to do their job.

Peel himself said that without police, the only alternative to keeping the peace is military force and harsh judicial penalties (like being transported to Wales).

If you wish for services of the police to continue to be available, the public will have to be less antagonistic to their job.
It cuts both ways. Maybe stop kicking little kids on the floor and then making it easy for the thug to get away with it.

Im not anti police. My son has just joined the force and I recognise that they have a difficult job. But every bad copper makes his job harder.
 

Firstly he gets off without any jail time for an assault on a minor.
Secondly, he is allowed to retire with a full pension whilst suspended.

This is the police looking after its own, something that happens in every organisation everywhere in the world. The people who waved through this arrangement should be sacked and then charged with corruption.

Watch the video and imagine if it was your child.




And these are the only people you think should have guns.

You be stooooooopid.
 

Forum List

Back
Top