Pocahontas campaign workers votes to unionize

If Ms. Warren can negotiate an agreement which will save her campaign millions while increasing productivity, it would show other employers why they too should invite Big Labor in to run their businesses.

Of course if her campaign is a Pathetic Failure, it will be a warning to other employers
 
If Ms. Warren can negotiate an agreement which will save her campaign millions while increasing productivity, it would show other employers why they too should invite Big Labor in to run their businesses.

Of course if her campaign is a Pathetic Failure, it will be a warning to other employers
You do realize that when a union gets in, the costs necessarily skyrocket. Not only does the pay become higher but all the future promises like healthcare and union retirements are added in.

Most presidential candidates are in the race not to win, but to keep the campaign funds that dont get used up at the end of the campaign. If the war chest has 1 million dollars in it, the candidate is a millionaire. If the candidate overspends then they go bankrupt.
 
If Ms. Warren can negotiate an agreement which will save her campaign millions while increasing productivity, it would show other employers why they too should invite Big Labor in to run their businesses.

Of course if her campaign is a Pathetic Failure, it will be a warning to other employers
You do realize that when a union gets in, the costs necessarily skyrocket. Not only does the pay become higher but all the future promises like healthcare and union retirements are added in.

Most presidential candidates are in the race not to win, but to keep the campaign funds that dont get used up at the end of the campaign. If the war chest has 1 million dollars in it, the candidate is a millionaire. If the candidate overspends then they go bankrupt.


That's true, that costs will skyrocket.

However, if ALL of the Democrat campaigns sign union contracts with Big Labor, they will all be on an equal footing.

Since the libs have been so hot to trot for Big Labor, I doubt if any will want to have Scab-run campaigns.
 
If Ms. Warren can negotiate an agreement which will save her campaign millions while increasing productivity, it would show other employers why they too should invite Big Labor in to run their businesses.

Of course if her campaign is a Pathetic Failure, it will be a warning to other employers
You do realize that when a union gets in, the costs necessarily skyrocket. Not only does the pay become higher but all the future promises like healthcare and union retirements are added in.

Most presidential candidates are in the race not to win, but to keep the campaign funds that dont get used up at the end of the campaign. If the war chest has 1 million dollars in it, the candidate is a millionaire. If the candidate overspends then they go bankrupt.


That's true, that costs will skyrocket.

However, if ALL of the Democrat campaigns sign union contracts with Big Labor, they will all be on an equal footing.

Since the libs have been so hot to trot for Big Labor, I doubt if any will want to have Scab-run campaigns.
Oh, that is where you are wrong. LibtardtoDimwitocraps, dont want equal footing, they want everyone else to "Do as I say, not as I do". Which was why Hitlery ran a campaign for women to have equal pay, then paid her women less than men. Libs are hypocrites.

The Clinton Foundation's gender pay gap worried campaign
 

Forum List

Back
Top