Planned Parenthood Staffers Talk About Ripping Out Babies Body Parts Joke About Eyeballs Rolling Out

[NYcarbineer]

Interesting to see libtarded denials and coping systems working simultaneously in real time. I'll be saving this thread for reference - for the next time I see libtardz talking about how much they care about children.

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Roe v Wade is based around the 14th amendment--and privacy was challenged at one point in time--because the word "privacy" is not in the constitution.

This topic came up in 2012 when Rick Santorum was continually stating that States have the right to ban birth control contraceptives. Meaning that your next door neighbor via a ballot will decide if you use them or not.

Santorum is still arguing against a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision (Griswold v Conneticut)-and your privacy.
Griswold v. Connecticut - Wikipedia


This is what you get out of religious nut cases.

Since this decision the Supreme Court considers privacy and will protect your right to privacy.

The question remains unanswered by the left. . .

Does anyone have the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another human being. . . . and then hide that violation behind a so called "right to privacy?"

Yes or no?

Your question contains the false assumption that the fetus is a person no different than you or me. That is part of the debate, not an established fact.

The right to privacy does not violate another person's right because there is no other person involved.

 

[oreo]

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Roe v Wade is based around the 14th amendment--and privacy was challenged at one point in time--because the word "privacy" is not in the constitution.

This topic came up in 2012 when Rick Santorum was continually stating that States have the right to ban birth control contraceptives. Meaning that your next door neighbor via a ballot will decide if you use them or not.

Santorum is still arguing against a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision (Griswold v Conneticut)-and your privacy.
Griswold v. Connecticut - Wikipedia


This is what you get out of religious nut cases.

Since this decision the Supreme Court considers privacy and will protect your right to privacy.

The question remains unanswered by the left. . .

Does anyone have the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another human being. . . . and then hide that violation behind a so called "right to privacy?"

Yes or no?

Your question contains the false assumption that the fetus is a person no different than you or me. That is part of the debate, not an established fact.

The right to privacy does not violate another person's right because there is no other person involved.

They still can't figure that one out--and they also don't know it's the primary reason that Mitt Romney lost in 2012. This is why you NEVER campaign on already settled U.S. Supreme court decisions like Roe v Wade--they don't belong ANYWHERE on a political platform.

In 2012--the main topic of discussion was Abortion--that then went into who's NOT going to pay for birth control pills--that then went into what was "legal legitimate RAPE" questions that was always answered by a ancient White Male typically on the Mike Huckabee program.

They were told that Mitt Romney lost because he wasn't conservative enough by every right wing talk show host out there and they believed it. That couldn't be farther from the TRUTH. Women went running into Obama's column by double digits, younger women by a WHOPPING 36 points.
Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History
Why Romney Lost And Republicans Keep Losing
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump