hortysir
In Memorial of 47
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUBGsJ5-jfI]Nancy Pelosi Wants to Amend the First Amendment Alex Jones' Infowars - YouTube[/ame]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just a little while ago Joe was wanting to amend the 2nd amendment to fit who he thought should own guns.
Nancy-beast wants to amend the 1st.
Guess our beloved COTUS just isn't any good anymore.
We need to amend congress.
We need to amend congress.
^^THIS (And their pay...and force them OUT of the District of criminals by limiting thier session length).
Force them to spend more time with those that put them there...
Just a little while ago Joe was wanting to amend the 2nd amendment to fit who he thought should own guns.
Nancy-beast wants to amend the 1st.
Guess our beloved COTUS just isn't any good anymore.
Exactly. Rep to come mon vieux!We need to amend congress.
^^THIS (And their pay...and force them OUT of the District of criminals by limiting thier session length).
Force them to spend more time with those that put them there...
A rule that would go a long way would be to adjust the rules of redress would be to limit that action to their home districts.
This is from Alex Jones, so even though I can see that it is in fact a CSPAN broadcast, I'm going to discredit it.
What would be a good source?
Because it's splattered all over the web
This is from Alex Jones, so even though I can see that it is in fact a CSPAN broadcast, I'm going to discredit it.
What would be a good source?
Because it's splattered all over the web
I don't know I'm just trying to see what it feels like to be one of those idiots that think like that.
The only fix I can see for what has become a totally flawed and corrupt system because of the flawed and corrupt people making the rules and the flawed and corrupt people benefitting from those rules is a quite simple concept.
Make it constitutionally illegal for the Federal Government at any level to use the people's money for any form of charity, benevolence, or benefit to any person, group, entity, or special interest that does not benefit all regardless of ideology, party affiliation, or socioeconomic status.
If we would do that, it would accomplish many things:
1. We would no longer have professional politicians and bureaucrats whose No. 1 goal is to solidify, guarantee, and increase their personal power, prestige, influence, and wealth. We would instead again have citizen legislators and public servants who would be interested in providing excellence in government instead of buying power.
2. We would have an electorate who would again be interested in electing the best people to high office rather than electing those who promise to keep the free stuff coming.
3. We would have a balanced budget and people in Congress interested in keeping it that way.
4. We would again have the most free, most prosperous, most innovative, most creative, most successful people on Earth.
5. And we would remove the lobbyist and special interest monies from the equation because they would have no way to profit from their efforts.
What do you think the odds are that our fearless leader or Pelosi would go along with that?