There is not a single element of truth in your entire statement, unsurprising given the source, but you have moved beyond mere distortion and twisting into the complete fabrication of bald lies. Not that you were above such before, but there is a definite smell of desperation in their current bald application.
Take a look at all the studies you have posted. Please note the percentage of those studies that are based on computer models. Get back to me when you have completed the review.
I have no reason to believe that the percentage of studies employing computer modelling for one aspect or another of those particular studies is any different from the percentage of scientific studies that utilize some aspect of computer modelling in other fields of research. If you feel that there is a significant difference in this regard please present your evidence.
One distorted example from a fringe internet political blog is hardly compelling evidence of what you assert. I look forward to reviewing your findings, data and methodology.
C'mon dude. Do a little work here. A simple literature review is a simple thing to do. Pick 25 studies at random and tell us how many are based wholly on modeling.