miami_thomas
VIP Member
- Jan 20, 2011
- 1,019
- 86
- 83
Okay, the following words eliminate all credibility when you post them.
Marxist
Communist
Socialist
If you say these words, you are a bad joke as a poster, and no one but the wingiest wingnut will take you seriously.
Exactly you just proved my point by denying their existence. Your avatar is a Marxist, Socialist, Communist symbol yet you are saying they do not exist. Funny I could not have hoped for a better response from you.
Um, actually, my avatar is from a Pink Floyd Album...
At best the argument is not about "communism". No one is going to confiscate all the corporations and execute all the CEO's...
At best, this argument is between supply siders and Keynesians... and the Supply Siders have failed to produce.
The names Communism, Socialism, and Marxism are not what are bad. They are after all just titles and mean nothing without their substance. And that is just it because what Democrats are selling is the same philosophies of Marx and Engels they just don’t want it called the same thing. At the end, all of the ideals have the same ultimate goal. Equality to all and the elimination of classes and that is where all fail. There is no such thing as equality and each destroys themselves in their attempt to gain something unattainable. To pretend there can be a perfect run government when there is no such thing as perfection is a disaster. That is because the only way to ensure equality is to have one power running everything to ensure that equality. That something has to be the government but if the government is running things then it is not equal. Therefore, equality is never reached. At least in a free market capitalist economy everyone has a chance do to their own ability to make it big. In all those other equality ideals government decides who the haves and who have nots are and it will always be themselves that are the haves.
You can paint it and call it whatever you want but in the end they all want the same thing which is unattainable. There will always be greed, there will always be the haves, and there will always be the have nots. At the end the only thing we are arguing is by what means they are decided. Democrats like the others wish for the government to decide because they believe they will create equality. Again a lie but even if they could get equality it would have to be forced equality and that is the problem is you can only force people if you take away freedom and human rights. There is no other way and that is where all the others have failed in the past and that is where the Democrats ideology will fail in the future.
Last edited: