Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, when I was talking to you, I was referring to things bigger than micro.You like it bigger, you said, 2 is bigger than one!Why would I...but do tell us more about your likes.You must like 2 fists then....That you don't know about "bigger"? Not at all.Does THAT bother you....Bigger is better. But I'm sure you've not known that.
A bike helmet yes, because it's the law. Monkey bars? Why not?Actually, I don't. I'm a mom who would have immediately put everything down to go get my child and keep him from stepping on the dog and maybe get bit. Palin goes for the camera.No they wouldn't if they were big dogs like Palin's and had been around kids for awhile, You're just another HACK like the liberal CU*T that wants Palin's kid bitten!
Bet you make you kid wear a bike helmet, and can't play on Monkey Bars either!
So tell us....you would let children step on dogs.
When they were little like Palin's kid, it was PLAY for the big dogs, they used to grab the kids by the shirt collar and drag them around the house... everyone, loved that!
You are equating that with stepping on a dog with your full weight?
Well, when I was talking to you, I was referring to things bigger than micro.You like it bigger, you said, 2 is bigger than one!Why would I...but do tell us more about your likes.You must like 2 fists then....That you don't know about "bigger"? Not at all.Does THAT bother you....
That is a one second shot. How do we know that he sat placidly there the whole time. What do you think the chances are that dogs like to be stood on like that? How many have you seen that act as stepping stools like that?A bike helmet yes, because it's the law. Monkey bars? Why not?Actually, I don't. I'm a mom who would have immediately put everything down to go get my child and keep him from stepping on the dog and maybe get bit. Palin goes for the camera.
Bet you make you kid wear a bike helmet, and can't play on Monkey Bars either!
So tell us....you would let children step on dogs.
When they were little like Palin's kid, it was PLAY for the big dogs, they used to grab the kids by the shirt collar and drag them around the house... everyone, loved that!
You are equating that with stepping on a dog with your full weight?
Did you see that dog grimace in pain, or did he simply just lie down and look like he was resting.... You have a problem with visuals, I see!
Well, good for you.Well, when I was talking to you, I was referring to things bigger than micro.You like it bigger, you said, 2 is bigger than one!Why would I...but do tell us more about your likes.You must like 2 fists then....That you don't know about "bigger"? Not at all.
And I was talking about clapping your hands!
That is a one second shot. How do we know that he sat placidly there the whole time. What do you think the chances are that dogs like to be stood on like that? How many have you seen that act as stepping stools like that?A bike helmet yes, because it's the law. Monkey bars? Why not?Bet you make you kid wear a bike helmet, and can't play on Monkey Bars either!
So tell us....you would let children step on dogs.
When they were little like Palin's kid, it was PLAY for the big dogs, they used to grab the kids by the shirt collar and drag them around the house... everyone, loved that!
You are equating that with stepping on a dog with your full weight?
Did you see that dog grimace in pain, or did he simply just lie down and look like he was resting.... You have a problem with visuals, I see!
Well, good for you.Well, when I was talking to you, I was referring to things bigger than micro.You like it bigger, you said, 2 is bigger than one!Why would I...but do tell us more about your likes.You must like 2 fists then....
And I was talking about clapping your hands!
If you say so.Well, good for you.Well, when I was talking to you, I was referring to things bigger than micro.You like it bigger, you said, 2 is bigger than one!Why would I...but do tell us more about your likes.
And I was talking about clapping your hands!
If you're that big, you deserve applause!
"palin really is an idiot...."
She truly is, independent of this standing on the dog incident.
Imbecile ... here's just one example of one of the bills that went through a committee .... S.190Who needs a bill?...YOU?... It was in committee you stupid fuck, and it got no further that Congress before everything regarding the problem was killed, Want to OCD more, I can do this with a dipshit like yourself for a SECOND NIGHT!!And yet, not a single bill is cited in that piece. Quite astounding you think you've proven Barney Frank or any RINOs pevented any bills without actually citing them.So now you've reduced your losing argument to RINO's held up the legislation??
What, the TRUTH too hard for you to believe? You've LIED so long you haven't got a clue what truth is anymore!vagisil
That highlights your insanity better than I ever could. By the eay, you lost this argument the moment you blamed Barney Frank. Was Barney Frank on the wrong side of the issue? Absofuckinglutely. Did Barney Frank kill any reform bills? No, he couldn't, you schvance. There were at least 5 bills attempting reform during those 5 Years between 2003 and 2007. One was originated in the House. Though Frank voted against it, he could not and did not prevent it from passing in the House. It died in the Senate because Senate leadership wouldn't put it on the legislative calendar for a full vote in the Senate. Two more bills originated in the Senate. Both made it out of committee but neither one was put to a full Senate vote. Again, House member Barney Frank could not and did not prevent either of those Senate bills from passing. The 4th bill was sponsored by Frank, so he clearly didn't prevent that one. The 5th was sponsored by Pelosi and Frank voted for it.
It's all in the timeline quoted, you stupid bastard, you can try and confuse the public, but you can't change recorded history! OCD a little more on this, try to gather a few brain cells this time.... Funny how these liberal scum concentrate on trivial matters!
What more proof of your insanity is needed?
Sure, if Reagan entered office in July, 1981, when the recession began. Sadly for you ridiculous claim, he started in January, 1981, when we weren't in a recession.Holyfuckingshit!!WTF cares if you keep asking irrelevant questions? I gave you the NBER list of recessions and proved there was no recession. When Reagan be a me president.
Deal with it. Or don't. Who cares?
From the biased NY Times that full of shit.
What was the interest rate and inflation rate in 1981. This will point to a recession or not.What the fuck does the New Times have to do with this?WTF cares if you keep asking irrelevant questions? I gave you the NBER list of recessions and proved there was no recession. When Reagan be a me president.
Deal with it. Or don't. Who cares?
From the biased NY Times that full of shit.
What was the interest rate and inflation rate in 1981. This will point to a recession or not.
Interest rates and inflation do not dictate recessions. Looking at inflation rates an interest rates during the Great Recession reveal that.
What do you think GDP has to do with recessions?
Regardless of your idiocy, I gave you a link to the NBER which shows there was no recession when Reagan became president; and you don't get to re-write history to fit into your biased partisan agenda.
Next?
You were saying,
1980-82 Early 1980s Recession - Timeline - Slaying the Dragon of Debt - Regional Oral History Office - University of California Berkeley
How about the federal reserve,
Recession of 1981 82 - A detailed essay on an important event in the history of the Federal Reserve.
U.S double digits unemployment rate of 1980-1981 vs. 2008-2009 single digit InvestmentWatch
How about another,
The U.S. Recession of 1980-1982
another?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/21/business/economy/21leonhardt.html?_r=0
another,
The American Economy During the 1980s
Do you even read your own links??
From the first link: "The 1980-82 recession, which the National Bureau of Economic Research considers as two separate recessions (one lasting for the first six months of 1980, the other from July 1981 to November 19)
From the next link: "The economy officially entered a recession in the third quarter of 1981"
From another: "Only part of the period would fit the notion of recession as a period of decline in GDP and even less of it would fit the strict definition of a recession as a period in which the GDP declined for two quarters or more. But clearly the whole period of 1980-82 is one of an economic malaise and represents an episode of economic difficulty."[/b]
From yet another: "The early 1980s recession was a severe recession in the United States which began in July 1981"
And another: "The nation endured a deep recession throughout 1982."
So let's tally up the damage ... 5 out of 6 of your links actually confirm what I said, which makes you look like a moron.
And the 6th was from the NYTimes, which you earlier disqualified as "biased" and "full of shit."
All you've done is prove me right.
Meanwhile, what you're incapable of doing, is proving the NBER is wrong; and the NBER says there was no recession when Reagan became president.
sorry. Maybe you'll have better luck when we argue some other topic.
1981 recession baby is all I needed to prove. Go inn your hole you dug.
Imbecile ... here's just one example of one of the bills that went through a committee .... S.190Who needs a bill?...YOU?... It was in committee you stupid fuck, and it got no further that Congress before everything regarding the problem was killed, Want to OCD more, I can do this with a dipshit like yourself for a SECOND NIGHT!!And yet, not a single bill is cited in that piece. Quite astounding you think you've proven Barney Frank or any RINOs pevented any bills without actually citing them.What, the TRUTH too hard for you to believe? You've LIED so long you haven't got a clue what truth is anymore!
That highlights your insanity better than I ever could. By the eay, you lost this argument the moment you blamed Barney Frank. Was Barney Frank on the wrong side of the issue? Absofuckinglutely. Did Barney Frank kill any reform bills? No, he couldn't, you schvance. There were at least 5 bills attempting reform during those 5 Years between 2003 and 2007. One was originated in the House. Though Frank voted against it, he could not and did not prevent it from passing in the House. It died in the Senate because Senate leadership wouldn't put it on the legislative calendar for a full vote in the Senate. Two more bills originated in the Senate. Both made it out of committee but neither one was put to a full Senate vote. Again, House member Barney Frank could not and did not prevent either of those Senate bills from passing. The 4th bill was sponsored by Frank, so he clearly didn't prevent that one. The 5th was sponsored by Pelosi and Frank voted for it.
It's all in the timeline quoted, you stupid bastard, you can try and confuse the public, but you can't change recorded history! OCD a little more on this, try to gather a few brain cells this time.... Funny how these liberal scum concentrate on trivial matters!
What more proof of your insanity is needed?
... and there were others like it. You really do have shit for brains.
Sure, if Reagan entered office in July, 1981, when the recession began. Sadly for you ridiculous claim, he started in January, 1981, when we weren't in a recession.Holyfuckingshit!!From the biased NY Times that full of shit.
What was the interest rate and inflation rate in 1981. This will point to a recession or not.What the fuck does the New Times have to do with this?From the biased NY Times that full of shit.
What was the interest rate and inflation rate in 1981. This will point to a recession or not.
Interest rates and inflation do not dictate recessions. Looking at inflation rates an interest rates during the Great Recession reveal that.
What do you think GDP has to do with recessions?
Regardless of your idiocy, I gave you a link to the NBER which shows there was no recession when Reagan became president; and you don't get to re-write history to fit into your biased partisan agenda.
Next?
You were saying,
1980-82 Early 1980s Recession - Timeline - Slaying the Dragon of Debt - Regional Oral History Office - University of California Berkeley
How about the federal reserve,
Recession of 1981 82 - A detailed essay on an important event in the history of the Federal Reserve.
U.S double digits unemployment rate of 1980-1981 vs. 2008-2009 single digit InvestmentWatch
How about another,
The U.S. Recession of 1980-1982
another?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/21/business/economy/21leonhardt.html?_r=0
another,
The American Economy During the 1980s
Do you even read your own links??
From the first link: "The 1980-82 recession, which the National Bureau of Economic Research considers as two separate recessions (one lasting for the first six months of 1980, the other from July 1981 to November 19)
From the next link: "The economy officially entered a recession in the third quarter of 1981"
From another: "Only part of the period would fit the notion of recession as a period of decline in GDP and even less of it would fit the strict definition of a recession as a period in which the GDP declined for two quarters or more. But clearly the whole period of 1980-82 is one of an economic malaise and represents an episode of economic difficulty."[/b]
From yet another: "The early 1980s recession was a severe recession in the United States which began in July 1981"
And another: "The nation endured a deep recession throughout 1982."
So let's tally up the damage ... 5 out of 6 of your links actually confirm what I said, which makes you look like a moron.
And the 6th was from the NYTimes, which you earlier disqualified as "biased" and "full of shit."
All you've done is prove me right.
Meanwhile, what you're incapable of doing, is proving the NBER is wrong; and the NBER says there was no recession when Reagan became president.
sorry. Maybe you'll have better luck when we argue some other topic.
1981 recession baby is all I needed to prove. Go inn your hole you dug.
Imbecile ... here's just one example of one of the bills that went through a committee .... S.190Who needs a bill?...YOU?... It was in committee you stupid fuck, and it got no further that Congress before everything regarding the problem was killed, Want to OCD more, I can do this with a dipshit like yourself for a SECOND NIGHT!!And yet, not a single bill is cited in that piece. Quite astounding you think you've proven Barney Frank or any RINOs pevented any bills without actually citing them.
That highlights your insanity better than I ever could. By the eay, you lost this argument the moment you blamed Barney Frank. Was Barney Frank on the wrong side of the issue? Absofuckinglutely. Did Barney Frank kill any reform bills? No, he couldn't, you schvance. There were at least 5 bills attempting reform during those 5 Years between 2003 and 2007. One was originated in the House. Though Frank voted against it, he could not and did not prevent it from passing in the House. It died in the Senate because Senate leadership wouldn't put it on the legislative calendar for a full vote in the Senate. Two more bills originated in the Senate. Both made it out of committee but neither one was put to a full Senate vote. Again, House member Barney Frank could not and did not prevent either of those Senate bills from passing. The 4th bill was sponsored by Frank, so he clearly didn't prevent that one. The 5th was sponsored by Pelosi and Frank voted for it.
It's all in the timeline quoted, you stupid bastard, you can try and confuse the public, but you can't change recorded history! OCD a little more on this, try to gather a few brain cells this time.... Funny how these liberal scum concentrate on trivial matters!
What more proof of your insanity is needed?
... and there were others like it. You really do have shit for brains.
Holy shit! OCDBoy is back with more USELESS INFORMATION! You really are one sick, fucking liberal, mouth breather! The OFFICIAL, from the WHITE HOUSE time lapse was given, and it just DRIVES you crazy, because it doesn't match YOUR FUCKING AGENDA.... YOU are our entertainment, you fruitloop!
