SAT2
Senior Member
- Nov 19, 2011
- 1,061
- 64
- 48
That's what obama is facing now, the collapse of his government and instituting a new government. Revolution by other means. Now if there is a counter revolutionary movement of brigandry, we will have to deal with that as it deserves.
What are you talking about?
At its foundation OWS is a movement of theft. It will not be successful. I am hoping it will end with a whole lot of bloodshed which will firmly end it and the ideology of entitlements with it.
The biggest danger to this country isn't a fight to deprive the rich of their wealth. It's if the rich find this country not worth fighting for. They could follow the many who have already left. The "rich" will become merely the comfortable middle class.
So we have to be really nice to them, so they don't leave us! The rich are a lot like Tinkerbell, aren't they?
The real assets of the nation isn't dollars, it's the craft and innovation of the people. The rich are those with the ability. OWS creates nothing except mountains of garbage. When those with the ability leave, and take their ideas and abilities to more welcoming shores, this country is finished. Really finished. Leave it to the disease ridden until it becomes feasible to just crush them.
Actually, many of the rich, if not most, are those who chose their parents well.
I fully agree with you, when obama loses the election a violent revolution is more likely. Democracy is the very last thing OWS can tolerate. We should welcome such a revolution as a necessary step to ending government thievery. Ultimately what OWS says is "Vote on how much you will give us for nothing." They fully believe the majority supports their indolence. That's the mistake.
Democracy is what OWS is about. That's why the GOP is attacking them.
That's what obama is facing now, the collapse of his government and instituting a new government. Revolution by other means.
LOL hardly. Obama is not the government, the Constitution is. A revolution cannot emerge from a national election.
I'm not saying one will emerge from Occupy either necessarily, but that's theoretically possible if reform doesn't pre-empt it. Reform, not revolution, has been the result of movements like this in the past every time in this country, so that's probably the way to bet. But if the rich and their puppet government are sufficiently, stupidly stubborn . . .
Actually Obama losing next year's election would make revolution more likely. But only in reaction to what his successor would do.
The Constitution is NOT the government. It is the legal framework which sets up the organization of our government, and by which our government is supposed to conduct itself (of course, we can all see how well THAT'S working out).