OUCH. Glenn Beck exposed as phony on HealthCare Debate

divecon lost again. You could not possibly be an underwater type of guy, because you would get lost the first time and drown. "Up! Up! Up, Stupid! Oh, heck. Get the boat hook and net."
 
1. Wal-Mart
2. Allergan (maker of Restasis)
3. Ally Bank (a unit of GMAC Financial Services)
4. Best Buy
5. Broadview Security
7. CVS
8. Re-Bath
9. Travelocity
10. ConAgra
11. GEICO
12. Lawyers.com
13. Men’s Wearhouse
14. Procter & Gamble
15. Progressive Insurance
16. RadioShack
17. Roche
18. SC Johnson
19. Sanofi-Aventis
20. State Farm Insurance

YOu said him losing sponsors was a lie. I say, you are wrong and I am right. Comments?

Boycotting Glenn Beck Sponsors For Calling Obama A Racist « Another War of Jenkins' Ear

More companies pull Beck ads: Wal-Mart, CVS, Best Buy - Michael Calderone - POLITICO.com

Beck dumped by more advertisers. - Topix

Advertisers deserting Fox News' Glenn Beck - MarketWatch

The Washington Monthly

The Seminal » Glenn Beck’s advertisers are backing away — help us increase the pressure

Seriously, do you need more links?

You said him losing sponsors was a lie. Say you were wrong, say it...say it...
WRONG again simpleton
i said the last time i heard the claim it was a lie
you REALLY suck at communication


and btw, you still claim Progressive Insurance has pulled their ads
so why did i see a Progressive Insurance ad on his show TODAY

Do you have a link that proves Progressive advertised on his show? If not, its just your word and from what I can see, that is not nearly enough.

Agree? Provide proof please, just like you asked me to do. Fair enough?
yeah sure, asswipe

you wouldnt believe it anyway
and as always, if there isnt a link on the interwebs it never happened
you are set up perfect for the orwellian times we are in

"we've always been at war with east asia"
 
:lol:
What's Bad for the GOP Is Good for Fox News




"The more viewers Fox attracts, the more voters the GOP repels. And the more voters the GOP repels, the more viewers Fox attracts. The most important part of the dynamic is that Fox News has no interest in doing anything other than attracting viewers. It will continue to ride this wave of anger and resentment irrespective of what impact it has on the Republican Party until it stops making them money. And yes, Barack Obama's popularity is dropping, and the bloom is beginning to come off the rose. But the GOP hasn't seen a concomitant rise in popularity: Just yesterday it hit the lowest approval rating it has seen in a quarter century, according to the New York Times."

What's Bad for the GOP Is Good for Fox News - Fox News - Gawker

:lol::lol: What kind of site is that?:lol: At least you could have given a Gallup poll.
As far as you know with yours is that it very well could have been made up of 100 socialists. :lol: Back to the sandbox for you sonny. :lol:

The NY Times is reputable, but your polling org of choice, Rasmussen, is the one in the sandbox. Have a nice evening.
except Rasmussen was the closest at getting the election right last fall, tied with just ONE other pollster
 
divecon lost again. You could not possibly be an underwater type of guy, because you would get lost the first time and drown. "Up! Up! Up, Stupid! Oh, heck. Get the boat hook and net."
nope, not
you just keep proviong you are the fucking moron i call you
 
WRONG again simpleton
i said the last time i heard the claim it was a lie
you REALLY suck at communication


and btw, you still claim Progressive Insurance has pulled their ads
so why did i see a Progressive Insurance ad on his show TODAY

Do you have a link that proves Progressive advertised on his show? If not, its just your word and from what I can see, that is not nearly enough.

Agree? Provide proof please, just like you asked me to do. Fair enough?
yeah sure, asswipe

you wouldnt believe it anyway
and as always, if there isnt a link on the interwebs it never happened
you are set up perfect for the orwellian times we are in

"we've always been at war with east asia"

You asked me to provide links to prove he was losing sponsors, now your saying links are not good to prove a point. What sense do you make dude. It is true what they said about you, seriously. Wow.
 
divecon lost again. You could not possibly be an underwater type of guy, because you would get lost the first time and drown. "Up! Up! Up, Stupid! Oh, heck. Get the boat hook and net."
nope, not
you just keep proviong you are the fucking moron i call you

Pssst...when calling someone a moron, spelling proviong this way is priceless. Seriously, just stop, this is too easy. Do you still need to know what irony means?

Oh, I forgot what they said about you. I am so sorry dude. My bad.
 
Last edited:
Do you have a link that proves Progressive advertised on his show? If not, its just your word and from what I can see, that is not nearly enough.

Agree? Provide proof please, just like you asked me to do. Fair enough?
yeah sure, asswipe

you wouldnt believe it anyway
and as always, if there isnt a link on the interwebs it never happened
you are set up perfect for the orwellian times we are in

"we've always been at war with east asia"

You asked me to provide links to prove he was losing sponsors, now your saying links are not good to prove a point. What sense do you make dude. It is true what they said about you, seriously. Wow.
you claimed you had them
i asked you to provide what you claimed
i personally watched the show, pretty much ignored everything but the ads
LOL
it was there
you can deny it all you want
 
:lol:
What's Bad for the GOP Is Good for Fox News




"The more viewers Fox attracts, the more voters the GOP repels. And the more voters the GOP repels, the more viewers Fox attracts. The most important part of the dynamic is that Fox News has no interest in doing anything other than attracting viewers. It will continue to ride this wave of anger and resentment irrespective of what impact it has on the Republican Party until it stops making them money. And yes, Barack Obama's popularity is dropping, and the bloom is beginning to come off the rose. But the GOP hasn't seen a concomitant rise in popularity: Just yesterday it hit the lowest approval rating it has seen in a quarter century, according to the New York Times."

What's Bad for the GOP Is Good for Fox News - Fox News - Gawker

:lol::lol: What kind of site is that?:lol: At least you could have given a Gallup poll.
As far as you know with yours is that it very well could have been made up of 100 socialists. :lol: Back to the sandbox for you sonny. :lol:

The NY Times is reputable, but your polling org of choice, Rasmussen, is the one in the sandbox. Have a nice evening.

:lol: That poll was from GAWKERS.COM, not the NY TIMES. NY TIMES is one partisan source from the left, RASMUSSEN is much more reliable, and more centrist than anything that you could bring to this thread. I would even accept a GALLUP poll, but you would be disappointed. So you need to hit the sandbox and play with flyweight, or whatever his name is. Oh yeah....paper view.:lol:
 
divecon lost again. You could not possibly be an underwater type of guy, because you would get lost the first time and drown. "Up! Up! Up, Stupid! Oh, heck. Get the boat hook and net."
nope, not
you just keep proviong you are the fucking moron i call you

Pssst...when calling someone a moron, spelling proviong this way is priceless. Seriously, just stop, this is too easy. Do you still need to know what irony means?

Oh, I forgot what they said about you. I am so sorry dude. My bad.
again, pissing about a typo is proof you are nothing more than a fuckwad
 
yeah sure, asswipe

you wouldnt believe it anyway
and as always, if there isnt a link on the interwebs it never happened
you are set up perfect for the orwellian times we are in

"we've always been at war with east asia"

You asked me to provide links to prove he was losing sponsors, now your saying links are not good to prove a point. What sense do you make dude. It is true what they said about you, seriously. Wow.
you claimed you had them
i asked you to provide what you claimed
i personally watched the show, pretty much ignored everything but the ads
LOL
it was there
you can deny it all you want

Just like you asked me, got a link?

I provided plenty to prove you wrong...you said the last time you heard he lost sponsors was a lie.

I know for a fact the last time you heard he lost sponsor was correct....I told you.

Still a lie?

Oh and don't forget, provide a link to prove you are correct about progressive. You could be right, I don't know.
 
divecon lost again. You could not possibly be an underwater type of guy, because you would get lost the first time and drown. "Up! Up! Up, Stupid! Oh, heck. Get the boat hook and net."
nope, not
you just keep proviong you are the fucking moron i call you

Pssst...when calling someone a moron, spelling proviong this way is priceless. Seriously, just stop, this is too easy. Do you still need to know what irony means?

Oh, I forgot what they said about you. I am so sorry dude. My bad.

You should here what the conservatives on this board are saying about you:lol::lol::lol:
Oh sorry...my bad
 
nope, not
you just keep proviong you are the fucking moron i call you

Pssst...when calling someone a moron, spelling proviong this way is priceless. Seriously, just stop, this is too easy. Do you still need to know what irony means?

Oh, I forgot what they said about you. I am so sorry dude. My bad.
again, pissing about a typo is proof you are nothing more than a fuckwad

Again, you missed the irony of you calling someone a moron and then having a typo. This is priceless.
 
nope, not
you just keep proviong you are the fucking moron i call you

Pssst...when calling someone a moron, spelling proviong this way is priceless. Seriously, just stop, this is too easy. Do you still need to know what irony means?

Oh, I forgot what they said about you. I am so sorry dude. My bad.

You should here what the conservatives on this board are saying about you:lol::lol::lol:
Oh sorry...my bad

KEWL. Seriously, KEWL! Woohoo.
 
Rasmussen is not accepted by rational, centrist points of view. Sorry to disappoint you, but the far rightoids in this country make up about 2% of the population. You are not centrist.
 
Rasmussen is not accepted by rational, centrist points of view. Sorry to disappoint you, but the far rightoids in this country make up about 2% of the population. You are not centrist.

Rasmussen is not rational with YOU Jake. You are
part of the 2% of the far left libs. But, there are about 40% who say they are conservatives in America to the 21% who say they are liberals. So Rasmussen may be more accepted and probably much closer to reality than you are.
 
You asked me to provide links to prove he was losing sponsors, now your saying links are not good to prove a point. What sense do you make dude. It is true what they said about you, seriously. Wow.
you claimed you had them
i asked you to provide what you claimed
i personally watched the show, pretty much ignored everything but the ads
LOL
it was there
you can deny it all you want

Just like you asked me, got a link?

I provided plenty to prove you wrong...you said the last time you heard he lost sponsors was a lie.

I know for a fact the last time you heard he lost sponsor was correct....I told you.

Still a lie?

Oh and don't forget, provide a link to prove you are correct about progressive. You could be right, I don't know.
wrong again fuckwad
 
Pssst...when calling someone a moron, spelling proviong this way is priceless. Seriously, just stop, this is too easy. Do you still need to know what irony means?

Oh, I forgot what they said about you. I am so sorry dude. My bad.
again, pissing about a typo is proof you are nothing more than a fuckwad

Again, you missed the irony of you calling someone a moron and then having a typo. This is priceless.
i missed nothing fuckwad
 
Rasmussen is not accepted by rational, centrist points of view. Sorry to disappoint you, but the far rightoids in this country make up about 2% of the population. You are not centrist.
well, that leaves you out since you are not rational
you are a fuckwad
 

Forum List

Back
Top