Vagabond63
Gold Member
Yes many times, and some of these are still in place.
Would you mind giving me some examples? I'm going to be busy reading up about the Nurenburg Laws and the Pact of Umar
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes many times, and some of these are still in place.
Yes many times, and some of these are still in place.
Would you mind giving me some examples? I'm going to be busy reading up about the Nurenburg Laws and the Pact of Umar
Yes many times, and some of these are still in place.
Would you mind giving me some examples? I'm going to be busy reading up about the Nurenburg Laws and the Pact of Umar
Try these for starters
Israel eases restrictions on Gaza - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East
Gaza blockade: Israel eases export restrictions - BBC News
Israel lifts blockade on West Bank city Ramallah
Israel lifts blockade of main road in southeastern Hebron
Israel eases Al-Aqsa limits as 90 wounded in Gaza, West Bank
Yes many times, and some of these are still in place.
Would you mind giving me some examples? I'm going to be busy reading up about the Nurenburg Laws and the Pact of Umar
Try these for starters
Israel eases restrictions on Gaza - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East
Gaza blockade: Israel eases export restrictions - BBC News
Israel lifts blockade on West Bank city Ramallah
Israel lifts blockade of main road in southeastern Hebron
Israel eases Al-Aqsa limits as 90 wounded in Gaza, West Bank
Thank you, but these are more cosmetic than anything. I meant remove all restrictions for a trial period, let them rule themselves and see what happens.
In a very real sense, what you are asking was already tried when Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza. It was an opportunity for Arabs-Moslems to demonstrate that they were interested in building a responsible, first-world society with an economy that was not dependent on the UNRWA welfare fraud. However, that was expecting too much from Islamic terrorists who were somehow expected to manage civil affairs of government when that is not the role of Islamic terrorists. It took no time at all following the Israeli withdrawal before the Islamic terrorists began launching rockets (an act of war) directed at Israel.Yes many times, and some of these are still in place.
Would you mind giving me some examples? I'm going to be busy reading up about the Nurenburg Laws and the Pact of Umar
Try these for starters
Israel eases restrictions on Gaza - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East
Gaza blockade: Israel eases export restrictions - BBC News
Israel lifts blockade on West Bank city Ramallah
Israel lifts blockade of main road in southeastern Hebron
Israel eases Al-Aqsa limits as 90 wounded in Gaza, West Bank
Thank you, but these are more cosmetic than anything. I meant remove all restrictions for a trial period, let them rule themselves and see what happens.
Israel withdrew from Gaza. That's just a fact that you're in denial of.Israel did not withdraw from Gaza. It just converted it into a large concentration camp over which it controls the perimeter, air space, territorial sea, controls imports and exports and collects its taxes.
Concentration camp in the original sense of the word, as during the Boer War.
Your Islamic terrorist heroes refused to renounce violence. Wave those Pom Poms, sweetie.The blockade, which was in effect prior to any rockets being fired, is the instigating act of war.
Instead of stuttering and mumbling in support of your Islamic terrorist heroes, accept the fact that Islamic terrorism carries consequences.Instead of writing nonsense in a very silly (and childish) manner, try to address the issue. A course in English composition and grammar would do you good.
The blockade is the act of war. When the Gulf Aqaba was blockaded, Israel considered it an act of war and started a war as a consequence.
Israel did not withdraw from Gaza. It just converted it into a large concentration camp over which it controls the perimeter, air space, territorial sea, controls imports and exports and collects its taxes.
Concentration camp in the original sense of the word, as during the Boer War.
The blockade, which was in effect prior to any rockets being fired, is the instigating act of war.
From what I've read in Wikipedia, Israel's withdrawl from Gaza did not remove any restrictions as Isreal kept control over the land border, seas and air space. Also the agreements regarding free and open access, building a sea port, etc were never implimented by the Israelis. I can see how that might have caused frustration amongst the Gazans that pushed them towards Hamas rather than Fatah.
From what I can tell, much of these eased restictions were cosmetic exercises without substance and not a genuine effort to allow the Palestinians the opportunty to create a more peace oriented cultural or emotional state.
I found this statement troubling in the Wiki article Israeli disengagement from Gaza - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In October 2004, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's senior adviser, Dov Weissglass, explained the meaning of Sharon's statement further:
"The significance of the disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace process, and when you freeze that process, you prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, and you prevent a discussion on the refugees, the borders and Jerusalem. Effectively, this whole package called the Palestinian state, with all that it entails, has been removed indefinitely from our agenda. And all this with authority and permission. All with a presidential blessing and the ratification of both houses of Congress. That is exactly what happened. You know, the term `peace process' is a bundle of concepts and commitments. The peace process is the establishment of a Palestinian state with all the security risks that entails. The peace process is the evacuation of settlements, it's the return of refugees, it's the partition of Jerusalem. And all that has now been frozen.... what I effectively agreed to with the Americans was that part of the settlements would not be dealt with at all, and the rest will not be dealt with until the Palestinians turn into Finns. That is the significance of what we did."[7]
Instead of writing nonsense in a very silly (and childish) manner, try to address the issue. A course in English composition and grammar would do you good.
The blockade is the act of war. When the Gulf Aqaba was blockaded, Israel considered it an act of war and started a war as a consequence.
Instead of writing nonsense in a very silly (and childish) manner, try to address the issue. A course in English composition and grammar would do you good.
The blockade is the act of war. When the Gulf Aqaba was blockaded, Israel considered it an act of war and started a war as a consequence.
WRONG AGAIN freddy as the act of war was the blocking of Israeli vessels from using the high seas