Oops, Liberals and MSM eat their former words again.

[HaShev]

Remember the attacks on Trump for claiming a Judge can be Biased?
Oh how the Democrats and Liberal Media tried to school everyone that Judges rule on cases seperating themselves from personal bias (like they claimed the FBI did).
CNN's Tapper even had the nerve in an interview with then Candidate Trump, saying in reference to bringing up judicial bias, that Hillary Clinton said that is a racist attack on a federal judge (to assume he couldn't rule fairly because he was a Mexican Heritage Judge during Trump's hardline stance on The Wall).
Ohhhhh noooo, they have
admitted that in Dems declaring a judge biased and not capable of fair rulings simply because he is Catholic or Straight or Conservative is in fact discrimination of religion, gender, and political affiliation. But this is much much worse then their condemning Trump for, because Trumps comments were of a hostile judge who made subjectively speaking unfair rulings, whereby Dems are bashing a Judge who has not made a ruling therefore they are making a narrative up and condemning the unknown. So they not only are condemning their own behavior, they are much worse behaved then that which they find deplorable.
Irony 101=choking on their own words and set standards.
ooops!

 

[Moonglow]

That was really short-sighted and stupid since both sides have no shortage of eating their own unwise words..

 

[BluesLegend]

Trump's SC nominee is widely respected and recommended by the legal community, including liberal law professors.

 

[HaShev]

Yes and a conservative is replacing a conservative which does not change fair rulings unless Dems admit they compromised or had mole judges in their pockets or are they admitting judicial biases??
They checkmated themselves with this one.
IT LOOKS BAD NO MATTER HOW YOU VIEW THIS.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Remember the attacks on Trump for claiming a Judge can be Biased?
Oh how the Democrats and Liberal Media tried to school everyone that Judges rule on cases seperating themselves from personal bias (like they claimed the FBI did).
CNN's Tapper even had the nerve in an interview with then Candidate Trump, saying in reference to bringing up judicial bias, that Hillary Clinton said that is a racist attack on a federal judge (to assume he couldn't rule fairly because he was a Mexican Heritage Judge during Trump's hardline stance on The Wall).
Ohhhhh noooo, they have
admitted that in Dems declaring a judge biased and not capable of fair rulings simply because he is Catholic or Straight or Conservative is in fact discrimination of religion, gender, and political affiliation. But this is much much worse then their condemning Trump for, because Trumps comments were of a hostile judge who made subjectively speaking unfair rulings, whereby Dems are bashing a Judge who has not made a ruling therefore they are making a narrative up and condemning the unknown. So they not only are condemning their own behavior, they are much worse behaved then that which they find deplorable.
Irony 101=choking on their own words and set standards.
ooops!
View attachment 204251

Excellent!! Great analysis