One of the reasons for high unemployment numbers

Discussion in 'Economy' started by RadiomanATL, Apr 17, 2010.

  1. RadiomanATL
    Offline

    RadiomanATL Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    24,944
    Thanks Received:
    3,823
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Not here
    Ratings:
    +3,836
    FOXNews.com - The Real Reason for Our High Unemployment Numbers
     
  2. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,476
    Thanks Received:
    19,872
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,508
    Does this mean the unemployed are turning down jobs?
     
  3. Baruch Menachem
    Offline

    Baruch Menachem '

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,204
    Thanks Received:
    3,235
    Trophy Points:
    185
    Ratings:
    +3,305
    Only true for a small percentage. Unemployment pays squat compared to what you can get for working, and folks will always go for the biggest check they can get.

    OTOH, unemployment is a huge cost for the business owner, and each marginal employee comes with a huge premium cost. In some places, as much as 1000 per month.
     
  4. RadiomanATL
    Offline

    RadiomanATL Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    24,944
    Thanks Received:
    3,823
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Not here
    Ratings:
    +3,836

    If they don't meet their unrealistic expectations of salary, yeah. I see it happen nearly every day at my other job.
     
  5. RadiomanATL
    Offline

    RadiomanATL Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    24,944
    Thanks Received:
    3,823
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Not here
    Ratings:
    +3,836

    Which is why so many people continue to stay on unemployment.
     
  6. rdean
    Offline

    rdean rddean

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    60,191
    Thanks Received:
    6,903
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    chicago
    Ratings:
    +15,024
    And I thought it was because Republicans screwed up the economy by deregulating Wall Street and encouraging American jobs get moved to overseas so CEO's can make a fast "big" buck.

    Hmmm, guess I was wrong. Turns out it's the middle class accepting unemployment insurance. They could live on the street. That would save us a ton of money.
     
  7. RadiomanATL
    Offline

    RadiomanATL Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    24,944
    Thanks Received:
    3,823
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Not here
    Ratings:
    +3,836
    1.5 / 10 on the troll meter. You woulda scored higher, but you didn't mention anything about Republican scientists.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  8. Xenophon
    Offline

    Xenophon Gone and forgotten

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    16,705
    Thanks Received:
    3,750
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +3,751
    I'm sure its true for a tiny percentage, but unemployment doesn't pay that much per week.

    But I do know a guy on my block that collected the full 99 weeks and never looked seriously for work.
     
  9. theDoctorisIn
    Offline

    theDoctorisIn Senior Mod Staff Member Senior USMB Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    30,045
    Thanks Received:
    5,800
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    East, but still West
    Ratings:
    +11,983
    My friend is on unemployment - and he can only get 26 weeks of benefits. I guess that's a NY thing though.
     
  10. RadiomanATL
    Offline

    RadiomanATL Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    24,944
    Thanks Received:
    3,823
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Not here
    Ratings:
    +3,836

    And if we kicked all those out that acted like your neighbor, the unemployment numbers would be......lower. Kinda proves the point, no?

    Although I don't have any idea how the government would be able to separate the wheat from the chaff.

    IMO going for 99 weeks of benefits on the taxpayers dime is getting a bit freakin' much. I would agree with having longer than the 26 weeks it used to be because of the state of the economy, but nearly 4 times as long is going too far. It's almost like the easy credit bubble...the longer we keep putting it off, the worse the pain is going to be when the day of reckoning comes.
     

Share This Page