On the Failed Job Creation Front, Obama Has Completely Run Out of Ideas

Care to tell me why Obama has not met with his Jobs Council this year?

Because they finished their work? Because Obama met with them after they completed their work, and implemented most of their recommendations, that Republicans weren't obstructing?

Why are you lying?

So they are out of ideas.

Unlike Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II, the Republicans didn't allow him to add to government payrolls. If Obama were allowed to spend like a Republican, the unemployment rate would be 2 points lower.

Do you expect ideas like education to yield results in a month? How about giving highly skilled immigrants to extend their green cards?

But the bottom line still remains is you're a liar. The Jobs Counsel met, and made recommendations, and you're inferring that Obama is somehow ignoring this issue? What a pant load you're selling.
 
Let's not forget that wealth has also decreased by 40% since 2007 under Obama - below 1992 levels.




Classic question: Are you better off under Obama? Oh, hell no!

Obama was president in 2007 when the housing market imploded? Are you really this fucking stupid?

I'm much better off with Obama because my 401K is back to almost where it should be. With Social Security, I'll have an OK retirement.
Still, since 2007, wealth is down 40% for Americans.

Americans are not better off under Obama.

Imagine where your 401K would be if Obama hadn't fucked up so much.
 
Could Pub dupes be any stupider or crazier? Assume the position, a-holes...

Oblivious Greedy Idiot Millionnaires 2012!

Thanks for the Second Pub Great World Depression and 4 years of mindless obstruction, "No compromise, un-American Tea Party GOP" (TIME). A disgrace.
 
Anybody with one eye and half sense knows that when Mitch Mcconnell and John Boehner said their primary purpose would be to ensure that Obama would be a one term president we have had a "Do Nothing" congress. No president has ever been able to control anything without some help...it's the way our forebears set up the system. Considering where we were the president hasn't done bad:

bush-obama-job-growth.jpg

Care to tell me why Obama has not met with his Jobs Council this year?

Because they finished their work? Because Obama met with them after they completed their work, and implemented most of their recommendations, that Republicans weren't obstructing?

Why are you lying?
you appear to be the one lying, Dickless.

Obama Ignores Jobs Panel, Rejects Keystone Pipeline
President Obama's jobs panel missing in action
Obama's White House jobs council fraud
Obama Too Busy To Meet With Jobs Council, White House Says: Huffington Post
 
Let's not forget that wealth has also decreased by 40% since 2007 under Obama - below 1992 levels.




Classic question: Are you better off under Obama? Oh, hell no!

and of the 40% it is due mainly to home values decreasing, that which started while Boosh was in office.
Still, 40% decrease in wealth for Americans.

And, U6 unemployment is atrocious.

And, other unemployment is consistently high.

Fewer folks are working now more than ever....under Obama.

Fewer jobs created.

And, let's not forget twice downgraded credit rating.





Obama is giving it to the American economy right up the ass.
 
Anyone can see he is out of answers, he is all talk but is doing nothing.

Anybody with one eye and half sense knows that when Mitch Mcconnell and John Boehner said their primary purpose would be to ensure that Obama would be a one term president we have had a "Do Nothing" congress. No president has ever been able to control anything without some help...it's the way our forebears set up the system. Considering where we were the president hasn't done bad:

bush-obama-job-growth.jpg

oh... an unsubstantiated chart from a blog! Let's all bow to it! :rolleyes:

Create your own chart from the source data, then: Table B-1. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by industry sector and selected industry detail [In thousands] select seasonally adjusted total nonfarm, then retrieve data, then under "more formatting options" select monthly changes for the time frame you want and include graphs.
 
bullshit.jpg


Anyone can see he is out of answers, he is all talk but is doing nothing.

Anybody with one eye and half sense knows that when Mitch Mcconnell and John Boehner said their primary purpose would be to ensure that Obama would be a one term president we have had a "Do Nothing" congress. No president has ever been able to control anything without some help...it's the way our forebears set up the system. Considering where we were the president hasn't done bad:

bush-obama-job-growth.jpg
 
Obama put in legislation that again the GOP shot down with a poision amendment, so it is not all Dems fault. The GOP has not lived up to it's campiagn promise of job creation when they took over the House.
 
After four years, Obambots are still blaming Bush.

Funny shit, since that means Obama is incompetent. He can't do his job, even in one term.

And, if he is good to his word, he should not be running for a second term.

But, in addition to giving the American economy one up the ass, Obama is not to be trusted...at all.
 
Because they finished their work? Because Obama met with them after they completed their work, and implemented most of their recommendations, that Republicans weren't obstructing?

Why are you lying?

So they are out of ideas.

Unlike Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II, the Republicans didn't allow him to add to government payrolls. If Obama were allowed to spend like a Republican, the unemployment rate would be 2 points lower.

Do you expect ideas like education to yield results in a month? How about giving highly skilled immigrants to extend their green cards?

But the bottom line still remains is you're a liar. The Jobs Counsel met, and made recommendations, and you're inferring that Obama is somehow ignoring this issue? What a pant load you're selling.

Neither party has ever cut the cost of goverment one dime. Guess which one began to cut taxes for the wealthy and borrow from foreign banks to fund the shortfall?


Total U S Debt


09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accomodate Tens of Trillions)

09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32

09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32

09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38(Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)

09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00
 
Hilarious. Even business, all business, says the ONLY thing that would cause them to hire is "demand". You know, the "demand" from the equation of "supply and demand"? It's not even mentioned in your article.

What did one Republican on this site say about "demand" driving the economy? Oh that's right. The idea is "absurd" and loony far left.

well for sure the fact Obama is talking of RAISING peoples taxes doesn't factor into anything.
And as for demand you could be right, those in the 8.2% unemployment probably aren't "demanding" much in the obamaNation
 
On the Failed Job Creation Front, Obama Has Completely Run Out of Ideas

That is so ridiculous. Obama has tried to follow the traditional way that every country as well as conservative presidents have used in the past and that's to use the power of government to stimulate the economy. Never before has there been a party that's 90% white that has stood in the way of anything that would help the country.

And they say it's not race.
 

Forum List

Back
Top