Nosmo King
Gold Member
There has been a lot of discussion concerning "freedom" from the Pam Geller "Draw Mohammed" contest and 'freedom of speech' to homophobic pseudo-Christians using 'freedom of religion' to discriminate against their fellow Americans. Is 'freedom' that elastic? Can the aegis of 'freedom' fail?
Flag burning is speech in the exact same manner Ms. Geller claims drawing the prophet is speech. It's offensive, crass, boorish and provocative, but it is indeed speech. Are the Right Wingers leaping top her defense true civil libertarians seeking to preserve her speech? Or are they simply xenophobes tossing stones at a hornet's nest and then, after getting stung claiming the nature of hornets is to attack without mercy? Would those same Conservatives actively protect the actions of a flag burning protester? After all, flag burning is political speech.
And those claiming 'religious freedom' to behave in a decidedly unreligious manner whenever they blanketly discriminate against Gay clients. Are they truly relying on religion to behave as they do? Or are they hiding behind a flimsy patina of religion hoping that this will sway a jury? Is freedom so elastic to stretch over these injustices?
When does 'freedom' encroach upon another's freedom? Can 'freedom be used as both shield and sword?
Flag burning is speech in the exact same manner Ms. Geller claims drawing the prophet is speech. It's offensive, crass, boorish and provocative, but it is indeed speech. Are the Right Wingers leaping top her defense true civil libertarians seeking to preserve her speech? Or are they simply xenophobes tossing stones at a hornet's nest and then, after getting stung claiming the nature of hornets is to attack without mercy? Would those same Conservatives actively protect the actions of a flag burning protester? After all, flag burning is political speech.
And those claiming 'religious freedom' to behave in a decidedly unreligious manner whenever they blanketly discriminate against Gay clients. Are they truly relying on religion to behave as they do? Or are they hiding behind a flimsy patina of religion hoping that this will sway a jury? Is freedom so elastic to stretch over these injustices?
When does 'freedom' encroach upon another's freedom? Can 'freedom be used as both shield and sword?