In what universe did I claim I opposed the repeal?
I'm talking about people..... yes people - not liking one another for human reasons....
You previous posts about democrats and "forcing" acceptance of homosexuals into the military.
So I misunderstood then: Do you or do you not support the repeal of DADT so that homosexuals are allowed to serve under the same conditions as heterosexuals? Yes or No
My question is what makes a persons sexuality more of a priority than other traits???
That's just it, under the United States Code that barred homosexuals from serving under the same rules as heterosexuals - sexuality WAS made more a priority than other traits. It didn't matter how strong you were, it didn't matter how smart you were, it didn't matter how dedicated you were, etc. If you were heterosexual and were strong, smart, patriotic, and motivated you were accepted. If you were homosexual and were strong, smart, patriotic, and motivated you were barred by law. If your sexuality (given other conditions) was heterosexual, your sexuality made you qualified. If your sexuality (given other conditions) was homosexual, your sexuality made you disqualified.
No there are other traits that you have to have to qualify, such as, not to short, not to tall, not to overweight, not to underweight (yes that is a disqualifying condition), not a drug user, not a felon (without a waiver), not to dump, not disabled, not being single with a bunch of children, etc - because those "traits" impact an individuals ability to perform the job requirements.
Being black, homosexual, Jewish, or a woman - does not impact the ability to perform within certain MOS/NEC's.
>>>>
Sorry to tell you that 99% of homos are democrats and it is impossible for a democrat to be "patriotic and strong."
Why won't you answer the bolded questions, just so we don't continue to have a "misunderstanding": Do you or do you not support the repeal of DADT so that homosexuals are allowed to serve under the same conditions as heterosexuals? Yes or No
70% of the people supported repeal and 60% of Republicans supported repeal. I could care less what the demographic is for party affiliation of homosexuals, but without some support, I would classify your "99%" figure has hyperbole.
BTW: here is the link to the 70/60 figures -->> In U.S., Broad, Steady Support for Openly Gay Service Members
Your Link?
>>>>
Last edited: