Ravi
Diamond Member
A conservative gay judge? OMFG the world is coming to an end!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just heard on a religious program that the Judge is gay. If true shouldn't he have withdrawn from the case for conflict of Interest?
Sure...and then any straight judge should have withdraw for the same reason.
We already know that there isn't a Constitution right for gay marriage, but a gay judge just legislated that there is a Constitutional right.
Sure...and then any straight judge should have withdraw for the same reason.
We already know that there isn't a Constitution right for gay marriage, but a gay judge just legislated that there is a Constitutional right.
We know that the Constitution doesn't give the government any authority to regulate marriage one way or another, but here we have conservatives demanding the government define marriage.
We already know that there isn't a Constitution right for gay marriage, but a gay judge just legislated that there is a Constitutional right.
We know that the Constitution doesn't give the government any authority to regulate marriage one way or another, but here we have conservatives demanding the government define marriage.
The so-called conservatives forget that part.
So, there is no such thing as a legal/civil marriage? The only marriages that exist are those done by religions?
That's how it's supposed to be. Marriage is a religious ceremony, and the state has no business interfering.
What about the countless religions and churches that want to perform same-sex marriages, but are currently unable to, due to the law?
Yup, Dan, those are the points I wanted to make.
The most liberal groups didnt want him...not to mention some of his views are more libertarian than not.
Looks like the fundamentalist Christians lose again, not only on the case, but on trying to smear the person.
They're not quite you're only obstacle, nor have they lost. Yet.
But I'm not optimistic. Marriage will be a thing of the past, one way or the other.
But hey, we'll all be "equal!" Isn't that what really matters, more than anything else?
how is marriage a thing of the past?
They're not quite you're only obstacle, nor have they lost. Yet.
But I'm not optimistic. Marriage will be a thing of the past, one way or the other.
But hey, we'll all be "equal!" Isn't that what really matters, more than anything else?
how is marriage a thing of the past?
When the definition changes to the point that it becomes meaningless, marriage will become a thing of the past.
And worse, when we abandon in the name of equality for god's sake, the preference of the traditional home, where children are raised by one father and one mother, and then legally term the very notion that such a home is the best available for children as bigoted, no matter how well it has served them and society as a whole, we will have subordinated their best interests for no better reason than to placate the sexual predilections of a relative few.
It is the most radical of egalitarian ideals, and ironically leads to unfairness in that it vilifies as haters and bigots anyone who claims the obvious, that a better way has served us well for many, many years.
So, yeah. I'm against it.
how is marriage a thing of the past?
When the definition changes to the point that it becomes meaningless, marriage will become a thing of the past.
And worse, when we abandon in the name of equality for god's sake, the preference of the traditional home, where children are raised by one father and one mother, and then legally term the very notion that such a home is the best available for children as bigoted, no matter how well it has served them and society as a whole, we will have subordinated their best interests for no better reason than to placate the sexual predilections of a relative few.
It is the most radical of egalitarian ideals, and ironically leads to unfairness in that it vilifies as haters and bigots anyone who claims the obvious, that a better way has served us well for many, many years.
So, yeah. I'm against it.
Really? on what planet?