Oh good, supremes ruled men can continue to abuse women via legal back alley abortions

[Lonnstar]

No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

 

[Lonnstar]

Texas is going to tell them to screw themselves.

 

[Fenton Lum]

No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Yes, that exactly what they said isn't it.

 

[OldLady]

Texas is going to tell them to screw themselves.

Texas should secede and be done with it. Good riddance.

 

[Syriusly]

No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

LOL- and by all of that- you mean the same level of regulation required for a colonoscopy? Or for child birth- both more dangerous than a legal abortion?

Why did Texas pass a law requiring far more stringent requirements for an abortion than for a colonoscopy- even though colonoscopies have 10 times the mortality rate of abortions?

Because this law was always about shutting down abortion clinics- and never was about women's health.

 

[Lonnstar]

No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Yes, that exactly what they said isn't it.

Yup.

"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the law "was an effort to improve minimum safety standards and ensure capable care for Texas women. It's exceedingly unfortunate that the court has taken the ability to protect women's health out of the hands of Texas citizens and their duly elected representatives."

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

 

[aris2chat]

it means that women don't have to seek back alley abortions but can go to safe clinics in their area.

 

[Katzndogz]

Encourage poor minority women to take advantage of the benefit.

 

[Lonnstar]

No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

LOL- and by all of that- you mean the same level of regulation required for a colonoscopy? Or for child birth- both more dangerous than a legal abortion?

Why did Texas pass a law requiring far more stringent requirements for an abortion than for a colonoscopy- even though colonoscopies have 10 times the mortality rate of abortions?

Because this law was always about shutting down abortion clinics- and never was about women's health.

That's the point, moron. They didn't. They don't have the same level of oversight or regulations.

And your statement about the danger of colonscopy vs. abortion..a total lie.

 

[WillowTree]

Texas is going to tell them to screw themselves.

Texas should secede and be done with it. Good riddance.

We agree. They should.

 

[Katzndogz]

it means that women don't have to seek back alley abortions but can go to safe clinics in their area.

It means that women can have an abortion in someone's garage performed by a person that learned how by watching you tube.

 

[Lonnstar]

it means that women don't have to seek back alley abortions but can go to safe clinics in their area.

No, it means the feds will continue to fund back alley abortions, and abortionists don't have to provide the same degree of care and the state isn't allowed to require the same degree of basic safety oversight as, say, a dentist's office. Or an optometrist. Or a veterinarian. Or a dairy farmer.

Because the primary objective isn't to protect women. It's to fund Planned Parenthood. Women and their babies are expendable.

 

[Fenton Lum]

No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Yes, that exactly what they said isn't it.

Yup.

"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the law "was an effort to improve minimum safety standards and ensure capable care for Texas women. It's exceedingly unfortunate that the court has taken the ability to protect women's health out of the hands of Texas citizens and their duly elected representatives."

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Yes, so the supreme court justices did not say that.

 

[Fenton Lum]

it means that women don't have to seek back alley abortions but can go to safe clinics in their area.

No, it means the feds will continue to fund back alley abortions, and abortionists don't have to provide the same degree of care and the state isn't allowed to require the same degree of basic safety oversight as, say, a dentist's office operates under.

Nah, you just didn't get your way, that's all.

 

[Hossfly]

WTF ever happened to birth control pills or morning after pills? If women would use them they wouldn't get knocked up during a drunken romp in the hay.

 

[Lonnstar]

No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Yes, that exactly what they said isn't it.

Yup.

"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the law "was an effort to improve minimum safety standards and ensure capable care for Texas women. It's exceedingly unfortunate that the court has taken the ability to protect women's health out of the hands of Texas citizens and their duly elected representatives."

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Yes, so the supreme court justices did not say that.

They maintain it's a violation of a woman's civil rights to provide her with safe, decent health care, if all she's doing is getting an abortion. Because apparently women who get abortions don't deserve basic protections that we force professional kennels to provide for their dogs.

 

[Carla_Danger]

No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Yes, that exactly what they said isn't it.

Yup.

"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the law "was an effort to improve minimum safety standards and ensure capable care for Texas women. It's exceedingly unfortunate that the court has taken the ability to protect women's health out of the hands of Texas citizens and their duly elected representatives."

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Ken Paxton is full of shit. There was only one purpose for these regulations.

 

[Lonnstar]

No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Yes, that exactly what they said isn't it.

Yup.

"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the law "was an effort to improve minimum safety standards and ensure capable care for Texas women. It's exceedingly unfortunate that the court has taken the ability to protect women's health out of the hands of Texas citizens and their duly elected representatives."

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Ken Paxton is full of shit. There was only one purpose for these regulations.

Yes, to protect women.

 

[Fenton Lum]

No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Yes, that exactly what they said isn't it.

Yup.

"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the law "was an effort to improve minimum safety standards and ensure capable care for Texas women. It's exceedingly unfortunate that the court has taken the ability to protect women's health out of the hands of Texas citizens and their duly elected representatives."

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

Yes, so the supreme court justices did not say that.

They maintain it's a violation of a woman's civil rights to provide her with safe, decent health care, if all she's doing is getting an abortion. Because apparently women who get abortions don't deserve basic protections that we force professional kennels to provide for their dogs.

Yes, and Texas is all about protecting women and shit.

 

[Syriusly]

No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.

Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations

LOL- and by all of that- you mean the same level of regulation required for a colonoscopy? Or for child birth- both more dangerous than a legal abortion?

Why did Texas pass a law requiring far more stringent requirements for an abortion than for a colonoscopy- even though colonoscopies have 10 times the mortality rate of abortions?

Because this law was always about shutting down abortion clinics- and never was about women's health.

That's the point, moron. They didn't. They don't have the same level of oversight or regulations.

And your statement about the danger of colonscopy vs. abortion..a total lie.

Nope

Texas tried to end abortions in Texas by effectively outlawing abortion clinics- and the court recognized that

Texas required among other things:
One of them required all abortion clinics in the state to meet the standards for “ambulatory surgical centers,” including regulations concerning buildings, equipment and staffing. The other required doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital

Neither of which is required for colonoscopies- which can be performed in a doctors office- and colonoscopies are 10 times more dangerous.