Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Personally, I don't see any of the teams I'd have put on my list as needing a Manning.
I'd have thrown Cleveland, Seattle, Jacksonville and Buffalo into the mix first.
Personally, I don't see any of the teams I'd have put on my list as needing a Manning.
I'd have thrown Cleveland, Seattle, Jacksonville and Buffalo into the mix first.
When you're starting quarterback is Tavaris Jackson, you should be very worried.Personally, I don't see any of the teams I'd have put on my list as needing a Manning.
I'd have thrown Cleveland, Seattle, Jacksonville and Buffalo into the mix first.
I am not sure Seattle is terribly interested. Teams go after a player like Manning when they are starting to get old and their window of opportunity is closing. Seattle is a very young team and their window of opportunity is just opening. If they wanted a high priced veteran quarterback they would have just kept Hasselbeck.
I was wrong on this one. I thought he would never play a snap again.
That said, he's going to Miami.
Arizona Cardinal's are what I'm betting on !
Arizona Cardinal's are what I'm betting on !
People are talking about having a rally at Cardinals headquarters. Sheriff Joe and Jan Brewer are going to be there to welcome Manning to Arizona.
Arizona Cardinal's are what I'm betting on !
People are talking about having a rally at Cardinals headquarters. Sheriff Joe and Jan Brewer are going to be there to welcome Manning to Arizona.
That ought to scare him away
49ers is the most logical option.
I don't know about that....Most teams would not be anxious to get rid of a QB that brought them to the Super Bowl.
Miami.
When you're starting quarterback is Tavaris Jackson, you should be very worried.Personally, I don't see any of the teams I'd have put on my list as needing a Manning.
I'd have thrown Cleveland, Seattle, Jacksonville and Buffalo into the mix first.
I am not sure Seattle is terribly interested. Teams go after a player like Manning when they are starting to get old and their window of opportunity is closing. Seattle is a very young team and their window of opportunity is just opening. If they wanted a high priced veteran quarterback they would have just kept Hasselbeck.
And yes, I never understood why they got rid of Hasslebeck. that made no sense to me.
When you're starting quarterback is Tavaris Jackson, you should be very worried.I am not sure Seattle is terribly interested. Teams go after a player like Manning when they are starting to get old and their window of opportunity is closing. Seattle is a very young team and their window of opportunity is just opening. If they wanted a high priced veteran quarterback they would have just kept Hasselbeck.
And yes, I never understood why they got rid of Hasslebeck. that made no sense to me.
Seattle definitely needs an upgrade at QB. I will say that by the end of the year Jackson was showing improvement and passing downfield more often and more accurately, but a team can only win a Super Bowl with a quarterback of Jackson's caliber if their defense is ultra-hot (Dilfer with Tampa Bay for example). Seattle has a very good defense but it's not ultra-hot.
As far as Hasselbeck, they got rid of him because he was expensive and they figured that by the time they got enough pieces around him to be a Super Bowl contender he would be gone anyhow. At this point (assuming they return Marshawn Lynch...which they will) all Seattle really needs is a DE, a QB, and maturity....although an upgrade at RT wouldn't hurt. But you want a QB who will grow with the team and that's not Manning.
They may go after him but I would be surprised.
When you're starting quarterback is Tavaris Jackson, you should be very worried.
And yes, I never understood why they got rid of Hasslebeck. that made no sense to me.
Seattle definitely needs an upgrade at QB. I will say that by the end of the year Jackson was showing improvement and passing downfield more often and more accurately, but a team can only win a Super Bowl with a quarterback of Jackson's caliber if their defense is ultra-hot (Dilfer with Tampa Bay for example). Seattle has a very good defense but it's not ultra-hot.
As far as Hasselbeck, they got rid of him because he was expensive and they figured that by the time they got enough pieces around him to be a Super Bowl contender he would be gone anyhow. At this point (assuming they return Marshawn Lynch...which they will) all Seattle really needs is a DE, a QB, and maturity....although an upgrade at RT wouldn't hurt. But you want a QB who will grow with the team and that's not Manning.
They may go after him but I would be surprised.
Dilfer won with Baltimore, not Tampa Bay. Same principle though!