No.... that is DECIDELY NOT THE POINT...
The POINT IS:
That you stated that where SCIENCE established that Children and Animals could consent to sexual intercourse... that YOU 'were fine with that...'
What's more, you claimed that the Rind Study did NOT provide the conclusion that Children were capable of consent and actually benefitted from 'a consenual loving relationship with an adult.' Which was sumarily REFUTED....
The Point THEN BECAME, the foundation of your conclusion (noted above) and the elements of that foundation... PARTICULARLY where it has been INDISPUTABLY ESTABLISHED THAT THERE IS AN EFFORT AMONGST THE MOST PROLIFIC SOCIAL SCIENTISTS WHO STUDY USE THEIR PERCEIVED AUTHORITY TO INFLUENCE THE CULTURE THAT ADULT/CHILD SEX IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE AND OTHERWISE NORMAL!
A position which you specifically stated 'WAS FINE WITH YOU!'
Now again... an advocate of the normalization of adult/child sex comes to obfuscate the issue, to obscure the conclusions which they've offered and the IMPACT OF THOSE CONCLUSIONS ON THEIR CREDIBILITY.
Quote me where I said that "where SCIENCE established that Children and Animals could consent to sexual intercourse... that YOU 'were fine with that...'"
For animals perhaps, children no. Lying again, pub?
Yeah... I'm lyin' That's Right Nik... This is NOT A TEXT FORUM where the record is WRITTEN FOR ANYONE TO EXAMINE... THUS SUCH IS QUITE COMMON...
But let's take a look at this post:
Huh... So where 'science' could show that animals can consent to sexual intercourse... you'd be fine with that?
And that question goes to the others who adhered to the position that the sexual orientation of beastiality lacks the legitimacy of the homo-sexual orientation because animals can't give their verbal consent...
Which of course goes to the same question regarding children.
The APA has issued a 'SCIENTIFIC study' which concludes that children who consent to sexual relationships with adults actually benefit from the experience and that children who are known to have been molested as children do not suffer long term psychological injury...
Do you believe that where 'science' can show that a child is able to give their consent, that an adult who engages in sexual activity with such a child are within their RIGHTS and should not be condemned of suffer any consequences as a result of that decision?
Yes, I'd be fine with it.
And you are lying about the APA study. I know several people who were molested as kids. All of them are still effected by it, even though it is years later.
Now I can't help but to notice that you're "Nik" and that would necessarily mean that this was YOU saying just that... wouldn't it, NIK?
I was talking about animals, not children.