Obama's string of foreign policy successes

Naw.

What Obama is doing is cleaning house. As in getting rid of terrorists.

While it's well known that you people love guys like Gaddafi and Bin Laden..we don't.

We don't like boogeymen that really kill Americans.

We don't like perpetual war.

We want those who do harm to Americans gone. As in really gone.

Got it?

Yeah, that.

They like the SOUND of Bush's policies, and they can't figure out why Bush's policies were such huge failures.
 
It's OK if Obama does it...and what's scary is that we are seeing MUSLIM theocracies spring up after Obama's World Apology tour...and isn't it the Liberal Statists that were so afraid and accusatory of the right bringing theocracies?

It's nice, sad, and scary as Hell to see thier words come back and haunt them...on a worldwide scale...but I have to ask? WHY are they applauding Obama for bringing what they supposedly feared?

Duplicity? Partisanship? Utter stupidity? All the above?

You'd have to ask them that. Obama is doing EXACTLY what they accused Bush was going to do with meddling in the middle east, yet the CHEER HIM..

go figure..

Naw.

What Obama is doing is cleaning house. As in getting rid of terrorists.

While it's well known that you people love guys like Gaddafi and Bin Laden..we don't.

We don't like boogeymen that really kill Americans.

We don't like perpetual war.

We want those who do harm to Americans gone. As in really gone.

Got it?

He is getting rid of terrorists by supporting rebels in Libya, which include Al Qaeda, against a contained dictator in favor of Muslim extremist government run by guys who are involved with Al Qaeda?
 
More SHARIA LAW! More theocracies that the left was so afraid that the GOP was going to lead them to...:lol:

Chrissy? You are a fucking bootlicking backbencher rube. A fucking drone.

You're talking about what Bush and the Republicans put in place in Iraq.

This is a university graduation class in Iraq. Republicans did that. Remember, before Republicans raped the nation of Iraq, the women wore western style clothes. This is what they wear now. American Republicans and Bush did that to Iraq. This is what Republicans call "freeing" Iraq. Now, what happened to Iraqi Christians? Are they "free" too?

burka_graduation.jpg


April 20, 2006

Really, and we are just suppose to TAKE your word for this picture. I'd say it looks more like IRAN.
 
Folks, the thread clearly demonstrates the difference between Bush's foreign policy and Obama's.

Obama never claimed to be a pacifist or an isolationist.

Bush's policy was a failure, Obama's is far more successful.

Go figure.

That is utter crap. Obama's foreign policy has mostly been an amateurish nightmare, a disgrace and just as his domestic policy it will take extensive work to repair the damage that he has done.
 
Last edited:
Foreign policy by assassination? Barry spent his first year in office on an apology tour and kissed the ass of every two bit dictator who would agree to meet with him. Obama put pressure on Scotland to release the Lockerbie bomber to a hero's welcome in Libya and then he turned around and killed the Libyian leader. Meanwhile Hillary bounces around the globe pretending the US still has some clout in the world. We are in hock to China and Barry thinks it's "mission accomplished" when drone bombers kill a bunch of people and the muslem brotherhood gets another foothold. It's insane foreign policy.
 
Foreign policy by assassination? Barry spent his first year in office on an apology tour and kissed the ass of every two bit dictator who would agree to meet with him. Obama put pressure on Scotland to release the Lockerbie bomber to a hero's welcome in Libya and then he turned around and killed the Libyian leader. Meanwhile Hillary bounces around the globe pretending the US still has some clout in the world. We are in hock to China and Barry thinks it's "mission accomplished" when drone bombers kill a bunch of people and the muslem brotherhood gets another foothold. It's insane foreign policy.

Yeah, it doesnt make much sense to me either.
 
That is utter crap. Obama's foreign policy has mostly been an amateurish nightmare, a disgrace and just as his domestic policy it will take extensive work to repair the damage that he has done.

Except that there's nothing to back that up.

Replace "Obama" with "Bush", now that can be backed up.
 
That "apology tour" nonsense has been debunked.

Fact Checker - Obama's 'Apology Tour'

Obama advocated for the policy used in Libya, which turned out to be a success. Our nation supported people trying to overthrow a tyrant without getting ourselves into a quagmire.

The fear-mongering over what comes next is a political strategy, not a foreign policy point.
 
That is utter crap. Obama's foreign policy has mostly been an amateurish nightmare, a disgrace and just as his domestic policy it will take extensive work to repair the damage that he has done.

Except that there's nothing to back that up.

Replace "Obama" with "Bush", now that can be backed up.

So cultivating a relationship with Qaddafi and then supporting rebels, including Al Qaeda members, who oppose him isnt amatuerish or atleast rather conflicting? Being happy about a new Muslim state with ties to Al Qaeda who are going to impose Shariah law on the people isn't odd and amatuerish?

You don't think being happy that tolerable secular governments have been overthrown in favor of Islamic nations with ties to terrorists isn't something to worry about? or something that we will have to deal with down the line?
 
That is utter crap. Obama's foreign policy has mostly been an amateurish nightmare, a disgrace and just as his domestic policy it will take extensive work to repair the damage that he has done.

Except that there's nothing to back that up.

Replace "Obama" with "Bush", now that can be backed up.

Heh. It is backed up day by day and week by week. We are living Obama's amateurish nightmare, here and abroad.
 
That "apology tour" nonsense has been debunked.

Fact Checker - Obama's 'Apology Tour'

Obama advocated for the policy used in Libya, which turned out to be a success. Our nation supported people trying to overthrow a tyrant without getting ourselves into a quagmire.

The fear-mongering over what comes next is a political strategy, not a foreign policy point.

Why on earth are we using our resources to overthrow tyrants in favor of potentially worse tyrants?
 
You'd have to ask them that. Obama is doing EXACTLY what they accused Bush was going to do with meddling in the middle east, yet the CHEER HIM..

go figure..

Naw.

What Obama is doing is cleaning house. As in getting rid of terrorists.

While it's well known that you people love guys like Gaddafi and Bin Laden..we don't.

We don't like boogeymen that really kill Americans.

We don't like perpetual war.

We want those who do harm to Americans gone. As in really gone.

Got it?

He is getting rid of terrorists by supporting rebels in Libya, which include Al Qaeda, against a contained dictator in favor of Muslim extremist government run by guys who are involved with Al Qaeda?

What part of Gaddafi greenlighted and funded the Lockerbie bombing are you fucking missing?
 
Making a Global Apology Tour – Obama has spent the better part of his 14 months in office traveling the globe in a hairshirt, flogging himself in the streets on behalf of his country. Obama has apologized for a history of American arrogance (to the Europeans, no less!), for Guantanamo’s use as a recruitment tool, for American insensitivity to the Muslim World, for conducting the War on Terror in an abrasive fashion, and even for being too aggressive at the CIA. The President seems to have confused effective foreign policy with step nine in an AA program.
 
Oh bullshit.



LOL, yeah and all of the infrastructure and intelligence from years of fighting was just magically put into place by Obama. You lie.

Yeah I noticed you cut out my links.

Here they are again.

C.I.A. Closes Unit Focused on Capture of bin Laden - New York Times

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PGmnz5Ow-o]Bush: Truly not concerned about bin Laden (short version) - YouTube[/ame]

Here's another newsflash for ya.

Bush was commander in chief of the largest most expensive military in the world with the best tech money can buy.

On September 11, 2001, 4 commercial airliners were hijacked at the same time. That's probably a first in history. They had those planes up in the air for over an hour. Then they crashed them into the WTC and pentagon. And the time between both those events, our government and military had their collective thumbs up their asses thanks to the Commander in Chief.

George W. Bush. First President with a criminal record.

Good job boys.

:clap:
 
So cultivating a relationship with Qaddafi and then supporting rebels, including Al Qaeda members, who oppose him isnt amatuerish or atleast rather conflicting? Being happy about a new Muslim state with ties to Al Qaeda who are going to impose Shariah law on the people isn't odd and amatuerish?

Oh, try to be honest. "Cultivating"? You do realize that Bush wanted to overthrow Kaddafi and then developed a more cooperative relationship with him later on, right?

Saudi Arabia has Sharia law, too. You know that, right?

You don't think being happy that tolerable secular governments have been overthrown in favor of Islamic nations with ties to terrorists isn't something to worry about? or something that we will have to deal with down the line?

This was an overthrow from the ground. Not from the US, as was the case with Iraq. There was a UN response. Your expectations are not grounded in reality.

Bigfoot said:
Why on earth are we using our resources to overthrow tyrants in favor of potentially worse tyrants?

Why do you guys parrot this without thought? When do we EVER know the future?
 
Making a Global Apology Tour – Obama has spent the better part of his 14 months in office traveling the globe in a hairshirt, flogging himself in the streets on behalf of his country. Obama has apologized for a history of American arrogance (to the Europeans, no less!), for Guantanamo’s use as a recruitment tool, for American insensitivity to the Muslim World, for conducting the War on Terror in an abrasive fashion, and even for being too aggressive at the CIA. The President seems to have confused effective foreign policy with step nine in an AA program.

Uh, no. Please read the link I gave earlier.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top