Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The problem is - if Romney starts championing coal, he'll become a laughing stock with the centre.
There is a case for more nuclear, tidal or hydro perhaps - but not coal. It isn't 1955.
It's like campaigining for the steam engine to be reintroduced.
Even the short bus folks will eventually catch on to the need for green energy.
If Bush would of had Obama's numbers in Nov 2003. Kerry would of won like Reagan. Think about it.
Even the short bus folks will eventually catch on to the need for green energy.
have you ever put a spreadsheet to the cost per kw of solar and turbine?
I've got 35 winds turbines a mile from my house and when the wind aint't blowing...well go figure.
Even the short bus folks will eventually catch on to the need for green energy.
have you ever put a spreadsheet to the cost per kw of solar and turbine?
I've got 35 winds turbines a mile from my house and when the wind aint't blowing...well go figure.
And yet tidal energy is now producing electricity more cheaply and efficiently than any other source available.
The only issue being the US missed that bus full of jobs because the right wing campaigned against it.
Scotland just took one order for 200 turbines at US$10 million a piece.
So Scotland says - thank you America!
Wind farms produced 'practically no electricity' during Britain's cold snap
The cold weather has been accompanied by high pressure and a lack of wind, which meant that only 0.2pc of a possible 5pc of the UK's energy was generated by wind turbines over the last few days.
Jeremy Nicholson, director of the Energy Intensive Users Group (EIUG), gave warning that this could turn into a crisis when the UK is reliant on 6,400 turbines accounting for a quarter of all UK electricity demand over the next 10 years.
He said the shortfall in power generated by wind during cold snaps seriously undermined the Government's pledge on Friday to build nine major new wind "super farms" by 2020.
"If we had this 30 gigawatts of wind power, it wouldn't have contributed anything of any significance this winter," he said. "The current cold snap is a warning that our power generation and gas supplies are under strain and it is getting worse."
Coal stations are currently used as back-up generation when there is a surge in demand for gas and the wind does not blow – which both tend to happen during cold weather.
How many times are conservatives going recycle this ridiculous argument.
The problem is - if Romney starts championing coal, he'll become a laughing stock with the centre.
There is a case for more nuclear, tidal or hydro perhaps - but not coal. It isn't 1955.
It's like campaigining for the steam engine to be reintroduced.
Bullshit. You only reveal what an ignoramus you are. Coal is cheap energy. No one is falling for the anthropogenic global warming abracadabra.
The problem is - if Romney starts championing coal, he'll become a laughing stock with the centre.
There is a case for more nuclear, tidal or hydro perhaps - but not coal. It isn't 1955.
It's like campaigining for the steam engine to be reintroduced.
Even the short bus folks will eventually catch on to the need for green energy.
The problem is - if Romney starts championing coal, he'll become a laughing stock with the centre.
There is a case for more nuclear, tidal or hydro perhaps - but not coal. It isn't 1955.
It's like campaigining for the steam engine to be reintroduced.
Bullshit. You only reveal what an ignoramus you are. Coal is cheap energy. No one is falling for the anthropogenic global warming abracadabra.
LOL Nobody but every single Scientific Society in the world. As well as every single National Academy of Science and major University.